大葉大學圖書館 |

Comparative constitutional reasoning[electronic resource] /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	340.11
書名/作者:	Comparative constitutional reasoning/ edited by András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre, Giulio Itzcovich.
其他作者:	Jakab, András.
出版者:	Cambridge : : Cambridge University Press,, 2017.
面頁冊數:	xii, 854 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 03 May 2017).
標題:	Constitutional law.
標題:	Constitutional courts.
ISBN:	9781316084281
ISBN:	9781107085589
ISBN:	9781107449763
摘要、提要註:	To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316084281

Comparative constitutional reasoning[electronic resource] /
Comparative constitutional reasoning[electronic resource] /edited by András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre, Giulio Itzcovich. - Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2017. - xii, 854 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 03 May 2017).

To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect.

ISBN: 9781316084281Subjects--Topical Terms:

393265
Constitutional law.

LC Class. No.: K3165 / .C5793 2017

Dewey Class. No.: 340.11

Comparative constitutional reasoning[electronic resource] /
LDR:01874nmm a2200253 a 4500 001 522775
003 UkCbUP
005 20170511115559.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230416s2017 enk o 1 0 eng d
020 $a 9781316084281 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9781107085589 $q (hardback)
020 $a 9781107449763 $q (paperback)
035 $a CR9781316084281
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $c UkCbUP $d GP
050 0 0 $a K3165 $b .C5793 2017
082 0 4 $a 340.11 $2 23
090 $a K3165 $b .C737 2017
245 0 0 $a Comparative constitutional reasoning $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre, Giulio Itzcovich.
260 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2017.
300 $a xii, 854 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 03 May 2017).
520 $a To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect.
650 0 $a Constitutional law. $3 393265
650 0 $a Constitutional courts. $3 739656
700 1 $a Jakab, András. $3 748067
700 1 $a Dyevre, Arthur. $3 748068
700 1 $a Itzcovich, Giulio. $3 748069
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316084281