語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Political determinants of income ine...
~
Hazama, Yasushi.
Political determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies[electronic resource] /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
339.2
書名/作者:
Political determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies/ by Takeshi Kawanaka, Yasushi Hazama.
作者:
Kawanaka, Takeshi.
其他作者:
Hazama, Yasushi.
出版者:
Singapore : : Springer Singapore :, 2016.
面頁冊數:
ix, 112 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:
Springer eBooks
標題:
Income distribution - Political aspects.
標題:
New democracies.
標題:
Economics.
標題:
Development Economics.
標題:
Political Economy.
ISBN:
9789811002571
ISBN:
9789811002564
內容註:
1. Introduction -- 2. Theory -- 3. The State of Emerging Democracies -- 4. Multidimensionality and Preferences for Income Equality -- 5. Political Determinants of Income Inequality: Panel Analysis -- 6. Conclusion.
摘要、提要註:
This study explores why democratization does not necessarily result in inequality reduction in emerging democracies and reveals the determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies, where the average level of inequality continues to be higher and where there is a larger variance of inequality levels than in advanced democracies. Apart from economic, demographic, and social factors, the book highlights political factors that obstruct redistributive policies. In contrast to conventional studies on advanced democracies, which emphasize the relations between different classes, this study asserts that several political factors cause malfunctioning of democratic institutions at various phases of the political process in emerging democracies: multidimensional preferences, the failure of the political market, and weak state capacity. The book employs econometric methods to examine the effects of these political factors. The results indicate their significant effects. The multilevel analysis using the World Values Survey demonstrates that multidimensional preferences, operationalized as ethnic fractionalization, weaken demand for income inequality. Political market quality and state capacity are measured by the age of the largest opposition party, and the Quality of Government indicator is used for the unbalanced panel analysis covering the 1985–2012 period for 75 democracies. Both political market quality and state capacity reduce inequality, but the latter takes more time to show its effect.
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0257-1
Political determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies[electronic resource] /
Kawanaka, Takeshi.
Political determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies
[electronic resource] /by Takeshi Kawanaka, Yasushi Hazama. - Singapore :Springer Singapore :2016. - ix, 112 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in economics,2191-5504. - SpringerBriefs in economics..
1. Introduction -- 2. Theory -- 3. The State of Emerging Democracies -- 4. Multidimensionality and Preferences for Income Equality -- 5. Political Determinants of Income Inequality: Panel Analysis -- 6. Conclusion.
This study explores why democratization does not necessarily result in inequality reduction in emerging democracies and reveals the determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies, where the average level of inequality continues to be higher and where there is a larger variance of inequality levels than in advanced democracies. Apart from economic, demographic, and social factors, the book highlights political factors that obstruct redistributive policies. In contrast to conventional studies on advanced democracies, which emphasize the relations between different classes, this study asserts that several political factors cause malfunctioning of democratic institutions at various phases of the political process in emerging democracies: multidimensional preferences, the failure of the political market, and weak state capacity. The book employs econometric methods to examine the effects of these political factors. The results indicate their significant effects. The multilevel analysis using the World Values Survey demonstrates that multidimensional preferences, operationalized as ethnic fractionalization, weaken demand for income inequality. Political market quality and state capacity are measured by the age of the largest opposition party, and the Quality of Government indicator is used for the unbalanced panel analysis covering the 1985–2012 period for 75 democracies. Both political market quality and state capacity reduce inequality, but the latter takes more time to show its effect.
ISBN: 9789811002571
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-981-10-0257-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
655008
Income distribution
--Political aspects.
LC Class. No.: HC79.I5 / K39 2016
Dewey Class. No.: 339.2
Political determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies[electronic resource] /
LDR
:02762nam a2200325 a 4500
001
456097
003
DE-He213
005
20160817154023.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
161227s2016 si s 0 eng d
020
$a
9789811002571
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$a
9789811002564
$q
(paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-981-10-0257-1
$2
doi
035
$a
978-981-10-0257-1
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
HC79.I5
$b
K39 2016
072
7
$a
KCM
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
BUS092000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
339.2
$2
23
090
$a
HC79.I5
$b
K22 2016
100
1
$a
Kawanaka, Takeshi.
$3
655006
245
1 0
$a
Political determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
by Takeshi Kawanaka, Yasushi Hazama.
260
$a
Singapore :
$b
Springer Singapore :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2016.
300
$a
ix, 112 p. :
$b
ill., digital ;
$c
24 cm.
490
1
$a
SpringerBriefs in economics,
$x
2191-5504
505
0
$a
1. Introduction -- 2. Theory -- 3. The State of Emerging Democracies -- 4. Multidimensionality and Preferences for Income Equality -- 5. Political Determinants of Income Inequality: Panel Analysis -- 6. Conclusion.
520
$a
This study explores why democratization does not necessarily result in inequality reduction in emerging democracies and reveals the determinants of income inequality in emerging democracies, where the average level of inequality continues to be higher and where there is a larger variance of inequality levels than in advanced democracies. Apart from economic, demographic, and social factors, the book highlights political factors that obstruct redistributive policies. In contrast to conventional studies on advanced democracies, which emphasize the relations between different classes, this study asserts that several political factors cause malfunctioning of democratic institutions at various phases of the political process in emerging democracies: multidimensional preferences, the failure of the political market, and weak state capacity. The book employs econometric methods to examine the effects of these political factors. The results indicate their significant effects. The multilevel analysis using the World Values Survey demonstrates that multidimensional preferences, operationalized as ethnic fractionalization, weaken demand for income inequality. Political market quality and state capacity are measured by the age of the largest opposition party, and the Quality of Government indicator is used for the unbalanced panel analysis covering the 1985–2012 period for 75 democracies. Both political market quality and state capacity reduce inequality, but the latter takes more time to show its effect.
650
0
$a
Income distribution
$x
Political aspects.
$3
655008
650
0
$a
New democracies.
$3
376238
650
1 4
$a
Economics.
$3
172164
650
2 4
$a
Development Economics.
$3
463564
650
2 4
$a
Political Economy.
$3
590054
700
1
$a
Hazama, Yasushi.
$3
655007
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
463450
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
830
0
$a
SpringerBriefs in economics.
$3
466754
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0257-1
950
$a
Economics and Finance (Springer-41170)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0257-1
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入