大葉大學圖書館 |

Literature and the politics of family in seventeenth-century England /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	820.9/358
書名/作者:	Literature and the politics of family in seventeenth-century England // Su Fang Ng.
其他題名:	Literature & the Politics of Family in Seventeenth-Century England
作者:	Ng, Su Fang,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (viii, 236 pages) : : digital, PDF file(s).
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
標題:	English literature - History and criticism. - Early modern, 1500-1700
標題:	Politics and literature - History - 17th century. - Great Britain
標題:	Families - Political aspects - 17th century. - Great Britain
標題:	Families in literature.
標題:	Politics in literature.
ISBN:	9780511483837 (ebook)
內容註:	Introduction: strange bedfellows: patriarchalism and revolutionary thought; Part I. Revolutionary Debates: 1. Father-Kings and Amazon Queens; 2. Milton's band of brothers; 3. Hobbes and the absent family; 4. Cromwellian fatherhood and its discontents; Part II. Restoration Imaginings: Interchapter: Revolutionary legacies; 5. Execrable sons and second Adams: family politics in Paradise Lost; 6. Marriage and monarchy: Margaret Cavendish's Blazing World and the fictions of Queenly rule; 7. Marriage and discipline in early Quakerism; Epilogue: the family-state analogy's eighteenth-century afterlife.
摘要、提要註:	A common literary language linked royal absolutism to radical religion and republicanism in seventeenth-century England. Authors from both sides of the Civil Wars, including Milton, Hobbes, Margaret Cavendish, and the Quakers, adapted the analogy between family and state to support radically different visions of political community. They used family metaphors to debate the limits of political authority, rethink gender roles, and imagine community in a period of social and political upheaval. While critical attention has focused on how the common analogy linking father and king, family and state, bolstered royal and paternal claims to authority and obedience, its meaning was in fact intensely contested. In this wide-ranging study, Su Fang Ng analyses the language and metaphors used to describe the relationship between politics and the family in both literary and political writings and offers a fresh perspective on how seventeenth-century literature reflected as well as influenced political thought.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483837

Literature and the politics of family in seventeenth-century England /
Ng, Su Fang,

Literature and the politics of family in seventeenth-century England /Literature & the Politics of Family in Seventeenth-Century EnglandSu Fang Ng. - 1 online resource (viii, 236 pages) :digital, PDF file(s).

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

Introduction: strange bedfellows: patriarchalism and revolutionary thought; Part I. Revolutionary Debates: 1. Father-Kings and Amazon Queens; 2. Milton's band of brothers; 3. Hobbes and the absent family; 4. Cromwellian fatherhood and its discontents; Part II. Restoration Imaginings: Interchapter: Revolutionary legacies; 5. Execrable sons and second Adams: family politics in Paradise Lost; 6. Marriage and monarchy: Margaret Cavendish's Blazing World and the fictions of Queenly rule; 7. Marriage and discipline in early Quakerism; Epilogue: the family-state analogy's eighteenth-century afterlife.

A common literary language linked royal absolutism to radical religion and republicanism in seventeenth-century England. Authors from both sides of the Civil Wars, including Milton, Hobbes, Margaret Cavendish, and the Quakers, adapted the analogy between family and state to support radically different visions of political community. They used family metaphors to debate the limits of political authority, rethink gender roles, and imagine community in a period of social and political upheaval. While critical attention has focused on how the common analogy linking father and king, family and state, bolstered royal and paternal claims to authority and obedience, its meaning was in fact intensely contested. In this wide-ranging study, Su Fang Ng analyses the language and metaphors used to describe the relationship between politics and the family in both literary and political writings and offers a fresh perspective on how seventeenth-century literature reflected as well as influenced political thought.

ISBN: 9780511483837 (ebook)Subjects--Topical Terms:

370826
English literature
--History and criticism.--Early modern, 1500-1700

LC Class. No.: PR438.P65 / N4 2007

Dewey Class. No.: 820.9/358

Literature and the politics of family in seventeenth-century England /
LDR:02754nam a22003258i 4500 001 449691
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020623.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 161201s2007||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 $a 9780511483837 (ebook)
020 $z 9780521870313 (hardback)
020 $z 9780521123723 (paperback)
035 $a CR9780511483837
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $e rda $c UkCbUP
043 $a e-uk---
050 0 0 $a PR438.P65 $b N4 2007
082 0 0 $a 820.9/358 $2 22
100 1 $a Ng, Su Fang, $e author. $3 645643
245 1 0 $a Literature and the politics of family in seventeenth-century England / $c Su Fang Ng.
246 3 $a Literature & the Politics of Family in Seventeenth-Century England
264 1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2007.
300 $a 1 online resource (viii, 236 pages) : $b digital, PDF file(s).
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
505 0 $a Introduction: strange bedfellows: patriarchalism and revolutionary thought; Part I. Revolutionary Debates: 1. Father-Kings and Amazon Queens; 2. Milton's band of brothers; 3. Hobbes and the absent family; 4. Cromwellian fatherhood and its discontents; Part II. Restoration Imaginings: Interchapter: Revolutionary legacies; 5. Execrable sons and second Adams: family politics in Paradise Lost; 6. Marriage and monarchy: Margaret Cavendish's Blazing World and the fictions of Queenly rule; 7. Marriage and discipline in early Quakerism; Epilogue: the family-state analogy's eighteenth-century afterlife.
520 $a A common literary language linked royal absolutism to radical religion and republicanism in seventeenth-century England. Authors from both sides of the Civil Wars, including Milton, Hobbes, Margaret Cavendish, and the Quakers, adapted the analogy between family and state to support radically different visions of political community. They used family metaphors to debate the limits of political authority, rethink gender roles, and imagine community in a period of social and political upheaval. While critical attention has focused on how the common analogy linking father and king, family and state, bolstered royal and paternal claims to authority and obedience, its meaning was in fact intensely contested. In this wide-ranging study, Su Fang Ng analyses the language and metaphors used to describe the relationship between politics and the family in both literary and political writings and offers a fresh perspective on how seventeenth-century literature reflected as well as influenced political thought.
650 0 $a English literature $y Early modern, 1500-1700 $x History and criticism. $3 370826
650 0 $a Politics and literature $z Great Britain $x History $y 17th century. $3 371229
650 0 $a Families $x Political aspects $z Great Britain $x History $y 17th century. $3 645644
650 0 $a Families in literature. $3 371070
650 0 $a Politics in literature. $3 370991
776 0 8 $i Print version: $z 9780521870313
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483837