大葉大學圖書館 |

登入

回首頁

A unified theory of voting :directio...

Grofman, Bernard,

A unified theory of voting :directional and proximity spatial models /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	324.9182/1
書名/作者:	A unified theory of voting : : directional and proximity spatial models // Samuel Merrill III, Bernard Grofman.
作者:	Merrill, Samuel,
其他作者:	Grofman, Bernard,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (xv, 213 pages) : : digital, PDF file(s).
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
標題:	Voting.
標題:	Social choice.
標題:	Voting - United States.
標題:	Voting - Norway.
標題:	Voting - France.
ISBN:	9780511605864 (ebook)
摘要、提要註:	This book addresses the questions: how do voters use their own issue positions and those of candidates to decide how to vote? Does a voter tend to choose the candidate who most closely shares the views of the voter or rather a candidate who holds more extreme views due to the fact that the voters discount the candidates' abilities to implement policy. The authors develop a unified model that incorporates these and other voter motivations and assess its empirical predictions - for both voter choice and candidate strategy - in the US, Norway, and France. The analyses show that a combination of proximity, direction, discounting, and party ID are compatible with the mildly but not extremely divergent policies that are characteristic of many two-party and multiparty electorates. All of these motivations are necessary to understand the linkage between candidate issue positions and voter preferences.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605864

A unified theory of voting :directional and proximity spatial models /
Merrill, Samuel,1939-

A unified theory of voting :directional and proximity spatial models /Samuel Merrill III, Bernard Grofman. - 1 online resource (xv, 213 pages) :digital, PDF file(s).

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

This book addresses the questions: how do voters use their own issue positions and those of candidates to decide how to vote? Does a voter tend to choose the candidate who most closely shares the views of the voter or rather a candidate who holds more extreme views due to the fact that the voters discount the candidates' abilities to implement policy. The authors develop a unified model that incorporates these and other voter motivations and assess its empirical predictions - for both voter choice and candidate strategy - in the US, Norway, and France. The analyses show that a combination of proximity, direction, discounting, and party ID are compatible with the mildly but not extremely divergent policies that are characteristic of many two-party and multiparty electorates. All of these motivations are necessary to understand the linkage between candidate issue positions and voter preferences.

ISBN: 9780511605864 (ebook)Subjects--Topical Terms:

434157
Voting.

LC Class. No.: JF1001 / .M475 1999

Dewey Class. No.: 324.9182/1

A unified theory of voting :directional and proximity spatial models /
LDR:01991nam a22003018i 4500 001 449011
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020624.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 161201s1999||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 $a 9780511605864 (ebook)
020 $z 9780521662222 (hardback)
020 $z 9780521665490 (paperback)
035 $a CR9780511605864
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $e rda $c UkCbUP
043 $a n-us--- $a e-no--- $a e-fr---
050 0 0 $a JF1001 $b .M475 1999
082 0 0 $a 324.9182/1 $2 21
100 1 $a Merrill, Samuel, $d 1939- $e author. $3 644148
245 1 2 $a A unified theory of voting : $b directional and proximity spatial models / $c Samuel Merrill III, Bernard Grofman.
264 1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 1999.
300 $a 1 online resource (xv, 213 pages) : $b digital, PDF file(s).
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
520 $a This book addresses the questions: how do voters use their own issue positions and those of candidates to decide how to vote? Does a voter tend to choose the candidate who most closely shares the views of the voter or rather a candidate who holds more extreme views due to the fact that the voters discount the candidates' abilities to implement policy. The authors develop a unified model that incorporates these and other voter motivations and assess its empirical predictions - for both voter choice and candidate strategy - in the US, Norway, and France. The analyses show that a combination of proximity, direction, discounting, and party ID are compatible with the mildly but not extremely divergent policies that are characteristic of many two-party and multiparty electorates. All of these motivations are necessary to understand the linkage between candidate issue positions and voter preferences.
650 0 $a Voting. $3 434157
650 0 $a Social choice. $3 392376
650 0 $a Voting $z United States. $3 340955
650 0 $a Voting $z Norway. $3 644192
650 0 $a Voting $z France. $3 525731
700 1 $a Grofman, Bernard, $e author. $3 644149
776 0 8 $i Print version: $z 9780521662222
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605864

筆 0 讀者評論

多媒體

多媒體檔案
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605864

評論

新增評論分享你的心得

Export

取書館別