大葉大學圖書館 |

State-directed development :political power and industrialization in the global periphery /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	338.9/009172/4
書名/作者:	State-directed development : : political power and industrialization in the global periphery // Atul Kohli.
作者:	Kohli, Atul,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (xii, 466 pages) : : digital, PDF file(s).
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
標題:	Industrial policy - Developing countries.
標題:	Industrialization - Developing countries.
標題:	Developing countries - Economic policy.
ISBN:	9780511754371 (ebook)
摘要、提要註:	Why have some developing country states been more successful at facilitating industrialization than others? An answer to this question is developed by focusing both on patterns of state construction and intervention aimed at promoting industrialization. Four countries are analyzed in detail - South Korea, Brazil, India, and Nigeria - over the twentieth century. The states in these countries varied from cohesive-capitalist (mainly in Korea), through fragmented-multiclass (mainly in India), to neo-patrimonial (mainly in Nigeria). It is argued that cohesive-capitalist states have been most effective at promoting industrialization and neo-patrimonial states the least. The performance of fragmented-multiclass states falls somewhere in the middle. After explaining in detail as to why this should be so, the study traces the origins of these different state types historically, emphasizing the role of different types of colonialisms in the process of state construction in the developing world.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754371

State-directed development :political power and industrialization in the global periphery /
Kohli, Atul,

State-directed development :political power and industrialization in the global periphery /Atul Kohli. - 1 online resource (xii, 466 pages) :digital, PDF file(s).

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

Why have some developing country states been more successful at facilitating industrialization than others? An answer to this question is developed by focusing both on patterns of state construction and intervention aimed at promoting industrialization. Four countries are analyzed in detail - South Korea, Brazil, India, and Nigeria - over the twentieth century. The states in these countries varied from cohesive-capitalist (mainly in Korea), through fragmented-multiclass (mainly in India), to neo-patrimonial (mainly in Nigeria). It is argued that cohesive-capitalist states have been most effective at promoting industrialization and neo-patrimonial states the least. The performance of fragmented-multiclass states falls somewhere in the middle. After explaining in detail as to why this should be so, the study traces the origins of these different state types historically, emphasizing the role of different types of colonialisms in the process of state construction in the developing world.

ISBN: 9780511754371 (ebook)Subjects--Topical Terms:

585545
Industrial policy
--Developing countries.Subjects--Geographical Terms:

337187
Developing countries
--Economic policy.

LC Class. No.: HD3616.D452 / K64 2004

Dewey Class. No.: 338.9/009172/4

State-directed development :political power and industrialization in the global periphery /
LDR:02070nam a22003018i 4500 001 448764
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020622.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 161201s2004||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 $a 9780511754371 (ebook)
020 $z 9780521836708 (hardback)
020 $z 9780521545259 (paperback)
035 $a CR9780511754371
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $e rda $c UkCbUP
043 $a d------
050 0 0 $a HD3616.D452 $b K64 2004
082 0 0 $a 338.9/009172/4 $2 22
100 1 $a Kohli, Atul, $e author. $3 643776
245 1 0 $a State-directed development : $b political power and industrialization in the global periphery / $c Atul Kohli.
264 1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2004.
300 $a 1 online resource (xii, 466 pages) : $b digital, PDF file(s).
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
520 $a Why have some developing country states been more successful at facilitating industrialization than others? An answer to this question is developed by focusing both on patterns of state construction and intervention aimed at promoting industrialization. Four countries are analyzed in detail - South Korea, Brazil, India, and Nigeria - over the twentieth century. The states in these countries varied from cohesive-capitalist (mainly in Korea), through fragmented-multiclass (mainly in India), to neo-patrimonial (mainly in Nigeria). It is argued that cohesive-capitalist states have been most effective at promoting industrialization and neo-patrimonial states the least. The performance of fragmented-multiclass states falls somewhere in the middle. After explaining in detail as to why this should be so, the study traces the origins of these different state types historically, emphasizing the role of different types of colonialisms in the process of state construction in the developing world.
650 0 $a Industrial policy $z Developing countries. $3 585545
650 0 $a Industrialization $z Developing countries. $3 578539
651 0 $a Developing countries $x Economic policy. $3 337187
776 0 8 $i Print version: $z 9780521836708
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754371