語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Rationality, representation, and rac...
~
Heikes, Deborah K.
Rationality, representation, and race[electronic resource] /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
128.33089
書名/作者:
Rationality, representation, and race/ by Deborah K. Heikes.
作者:
Heikes, Deborah K.
出版者:
London : : Palgrave Macmillan UK :, 2016.
面頁冊數:
xii, 262 p. : : digital ;; 22 cm.
Contained By:
Springer eBooks
標題:
Reason.
標題:
Mental representation.
標題:
Race.
標題:
Philosophy.
標題:
Moral Philosophy.
標題:
Feminism.
ISBN:
9781137591715
ISBN:
9781137591708
內容註:
Preface -- 1 What's the Problem? -- 1.1 The Terrain of Reason -- 1.2 In the Shadow of Modern Reason -- 1.3 Out of the Darkness -- 1.4 Beyond Modernism -- 2 Representation and Racism -- 2.1 Reason's Retrenchment -- 2.2 Purposive Racism -- 2.3 Vision and Representation -- 2.4 The Value of Inequality -- 2.5 Essential Inequalities -- 3 Philosophy's Outward Turn -- 3.1 The Turn Away From Modernism -- 3.2 The Pragmatic Turn: Peirce -- 3.3 The Continental Turn: Heidegger -- 3.4 The Analytic Turn: Wittgenstein -- 3.5 Post-Cartesian Observation -- 4 The Origin of Mind -- 4.1 Homer and the Presocratics -- 4.2 Plato and the Cartesian Problem -- 4.3 Aristotle and the Diversity of Soul -- 4.4 The Virtue of Reason -- 4.5 Virtue and Representation -- 5 The Promise of Virtue -- 5.1 Essentialism and The Darwinian Turn -- 5.2 Reason's Evolution -- 5.3 The Virtue of Moral Grounds -- 5.4 Reasonableness -- 5.5 Beyond Representationalism -- 5.6 The Virtue of Virtue -- References -- Index.
摘要、提要註:
During the Enlightenment, rationality becomes not a property belonging to all humans but something that one must achieve. This transformation has the effect of excluding non-whites and non-males from the domain of reason. Heikes seeks to uncover the source of this exclusion, which she argues stems from the threat of subjectivism inherent in modern thinking. As an alternative, she considers post-Cartesian reactions of modern representationalism as well as ancient Greek understandings of mind as simply one part of a functionally diverse soul. In the end, she maintains that treating rationality as an evolutionarily situated virtue concept allows for an understanding of rationality that recognizes diversity and that grounds substantive moral concepts.
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59171-5
Rationality, representation, and race[electronic resource] /
Heikes, Deborah K.
Rationality, representation, and race
[electronic resource] /by Deborah K. Heikes. - London :Palgrave Macmillan UK :2016. - xii, 262 p. :digital ;22 cm.
Preface -- 1 What's the Problem? -- 1.1 The Terrain of Reason -- 1.2 In the Shadow of Modern Reason -- 1.3 Out of the Darkness -- 1.4 Beyond Modernism -- 2 Representation and Racism -- 2.1 Reason's Retrenchment -- 2.2 Purposive Racism -- 2.3 Vision and Representation -- 2.4 The Value of Inequality -- 2.5 Essential Inequalities -- 3 Philosophy's Outward Turn -- 3.1 The Turn Away From Modernism -- 3.2 The Pragmatic Turn: Peirce -- 3.3 The Continental Turn: Heidegger -- 3.4 The Analytic Turn: Wittgenstein -- 3.5 Post-Cartesian Observation -- 4 The Origin of Mind -- 4.1 Homer and the Presocratics -- 4.2 Plato and the Cartesian Problem -- 4.3 Aristotle and the Diversity of Soul -- 4.4 The Virtue of Reason -- 4.5 Virtue and Representation -- 5 The Promise of Virtue -- 5.1 Essentialism and The Darwinian Turn -- 5.2 Reason's Evolution -- 5.3 The Virtue of Moral Grounds -- 5.4 Reasonableness -- 5.5 Beyond Representationalism -- 5.6 The Virtue of Virtue -- References -- Index.
During the Enlightenment, rationality becomes not a property belonging to all humans but something that one must achieve. This transformation has the effect of excluding non-whites and non-males from the domain of reason. Heikes seeks to uncover the source of this exclusion, which she argues stems from the threat of subjectivism inherent in modern thinking. As an alternative, she considers post-Cartesian reactions of modern representationalism as well as ancient Greek understandings of mind as simply one part of a functionally diverse soul. In the end, she maintains that treating rationality as an evolutionarily situated virtue concept allows for an understanding of rationality that recognizes diversity and that grounds substantive moral concepts.
ISBN: 9781137591715
Standard No.: 10.1057/978-1-137-59171-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
388210
Reason.
LC Class. No.: B833 / .H455 2016
Dewey Class. No.: 128.33089
Rationality, representation, and race[electronic resource] /
LDR
:02661nam a2200313 a 4500
001
447547
003
DE-He213
005
20161013151051.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
161201s2016 enk s 0 eng d
020
$a
9781137591715
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$a
9781137591708
$q
(paper)
024
7
$a
10.1057/978-1-137-59171-5
$2
doi
035
$a
978-1-137-59171-5
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
0 0
$a
B833
$b
.H455 2016
072
7
$a
HPQ
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
PHI005000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 0
$a
128.33089
$2
23
090
$a
B833
$b
.H465 2016
100
1
$a
Heikes, Deborah K.
$3
641378
245
1 0
$a
Rationality, representation, and race
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
by Deborah K. Heikes.
260
$a
London :
$b
Palgrave Macmillan UK :
$b
Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
$c
2016.
300
$a
xii, 262 p. :
$b
digital ;
$c
22 cm.
505
0
$a
Preface -- 1 What's the Problem? -- 1.1 The Terrain of Reason -- 1.2 In the Shadow of Modern Reason -- 1.3 Out of the Darkness -- 1.4 Beyond Modernism -- 2 Representation and Racism -- 2.1 Reason's Retrenchment -- 2.2 Purposive Racism -- 2.3 Vision and Representation -- 2.4 The Value of Inequality -- 2.5 Essential Inequalities -- 3 Philosophy's Outward Turn -- 3.1 The Turn Away From Modernism -- 3.2 The Pragmatic Turn: Peirce -- 3.3 The Continental Turn: Heidegger -- 3.4 The Analytic Turn: Wittgenstein -- 3.5 Post-Cartesian Observation -- 4 The Origin of Mind -- 4.1 Homer and the Presocratics -- 4.2 Plato and the Cartesian Problem -- 4.3 Aristotle and the Diversity of Soul -- 4.4 The Virtue of Reason -- 4.5 Virtue and Representation -- 5 The Promise of Virtue -- 5.1 Essentialism and The Darwinian Turn -- 5.2 Reason's Evolution -- 5.3 The Virtue of Moral Grounds -- 5.4 Reasonableness -- 5.5 Beyond Representationalism -- 5.6 The Virtue of Virtue -- References -- Index.
520
$a
During the Enlightenment, rationality becomes not a property belonging to all humans but something that one must achieve. This transformation has the effect of excluding non-whites and non-males from the domain of reason. Heikes seeks to uncover the source of this exclusion, which she argues stems from the threat of subjectivism inherent in modern thinking. As an alternative, she considers post-Cartesian reactions of modern representationalism as well as ancient Greek understandings of mind as simply one part of a functionally diverse soul. In the end, she maintains that treating rationality as an evolutionarily situated virtue concept allows for an understanding of rationality that recognizes diversity and that grounds substantive moral concepts.
650
0
$a
Reason.
$3
388210
650
0
$a
Mental representation.
$3
394135
650
0
$a
Race.
$3
408467
650
1 4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
179430
650
2 4
$a
Moral Philosophy.
$3
639709
650
2 4
$a
Feminism.
$3
205049
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
463450
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59171-5
950
$a
Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59171-5
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入