語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Training and Application of Correct ...
~
Cohen, Audrey Bretthauer.
Training and Application of Correct Information Unit Analysis to Structured and Unstructured Discourse.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
書名/作者:
Training and Application of Correct Information Unit Analysis to Structured and Unstructured Discourse.
作者:
Cohen, Audrey Bretthauer.
面頁冊數:
40 p.
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-06.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International54-06(E).
標題:
Speech therapy.
標題:
Gerontology.
標題:
Linguistics.
ISBN:
9781321888652
摘要、提要註:
Correct Information Units (CIU) analysis is one of the few measures of discourse that attempts to quantify discourse as a function of communicating information efficiently. Though this analysis is used reliably as a research tool, most studies' apply CIUs to structured discourse tasks and do not specifically describe how raters are trained. If certified clinical speech-language pathologists can likewise reliably apply CIU analysis within clinical settings to unstructured discourse, such as the discourse of people with aphasia (PWA), it may allow clinicians to quantify the information communicated efficiently in clinical populations with discourse deficits. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if using the outlined training module, clinicians are able to score CIUs with similar inter-rater reliability across both structured and unstructured discourse samples as researchers. Method: Four certified SLPs will undergo a two-hour training session in CIU analysis similar to that of a university research staffs' CIU training protocol. Each SLP will score CIUs in structured and unstructured language samples collected from individuals diagnosed with aphasia. The SLPs' scores within the structured and unstructured discourse samples will be compared to those of a university research lab staffs'. This will determine (1) whether SLPs can reliably code CIUs when compared with research raters in a lab setting when both using the same two-hour CIU training and resources allotted; (2) whether there is a significant difference in reliability when structured and unstructured discourse is analyzed.
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1592922
Training and Application of Correct Information Unit Analysis to Structured and Unstructured Discourse.
Cohen, Audrey Bretthauer.
Training and Application of Correct Information Unit Analysis to Structured and Unstructured Discourse.
- 40 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-06.
Thesis (M.S.)--Portland State University, 2015.
Correct Information Units (CIU) analysis is one of the few measures of discourse that attempts to quantify discourse as a function of communicating information efficiently. Though this analysis is used reliably as a research tool, most studies' apply CIUs to structured discourse tasks and do not specifically describe how raters are trained. If certified clinical speech-language pathologists can likewise reliably apply CIU analysis within clinical settings to unstructured discourse, such as the discourse of people with aphasia (PWA), it may allow clinicians to quantify the information communicated efficiently in clinical populations with discourse deficits. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if using the outlined training module, clinicians are able to score CIUs with similar inter-rater reliability across both structured and unstructured discourse samples as researchers. Method: Four certified SLPs will undergo a two-hour training session in CIU analysis similar to that of a university research staffs' CIU training protocol. Each SLP will score CIUs in structured and unstructured language samples collected from individuals diagnosed with aphasia. The SLPs' scores within the structured and unstructured discourse samples will be compared to those of a university research lab staffs'. This will determine (1) whether SLPs can reliably code CIUs when compared with research raters in a lab setting when both using the same two-hour CIU training and resources allotted; (2) whether there is a significant difference in reliability when structured and unstructured discourse is analyzed.
ISBN: 9781321888652Subjects--Topical Terms:
416160
Speech therapy.
Training and Application of Correct Information Unit Analysis to Structured and Unstructured Discourse.
LDR
:02519nam a2200289 4500
001
440902
005
20160422125027.5
008
160525s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781321888652
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI1592922
035
$a
AAI1592922
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Cohen, Audrey Bretthauer.
$3
629859
245
1 0
$a
Training and Application of Correct Information Unit Analysis to Structured and Unstructured Discourse.
300
$a
40 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-06.
500
$a
Adviser: Gerasimos Fergadiotis.
502
$a
Thesis (M.S.)--Portland State University, 2015.
520
$a
Correct Information Units (CIU) analysis is one of the few measures of discourse that attempts to quantify discourse as a function of communicating information efficiently. Though this analysis is used reliably as a research tool, most studies' apply CIUs to structured discourse tasks and do not specifically describe how raters are trained. If certified clinical speech-language pathologists can likewise reliably apply CIU analysis within clinical settings to unstructured discourse, such as the discourse of people with aphasia (PWA), it may allow clinicians to quantify the information communicated efficiently in clinical populations with discourse deficits. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if using the outlined training module, clinicians are able to score CIUs with similar inter-rater reliability across both structured and unstructured discourse samples as researchers. Method: Four certified SLPs will undergo a two-hour training session in CIU analysis similar to that of a university research staffs' CIU training protocol. Each SLP will score CIUs in structured and unstructured language samples collected from individuals diagnosed with aphasia. The SLPs' scores within the structured and unstructured discourse samples will be compared to those of a university research lab staffs'. This will determine (1) whether SLPs can reliably code CIUs when compared with research raters in a lab setting when both using the same two-hour CIU training and resources allotted; (2) whether there is a significant difference in reliability when structured and unstructured discourse is analyzed.
590
$a
School code: 0180.
650
4
$a
Speech therapy.
$3
416160
650
4
$a
Gerontology.
$3
343512
650
4
$a
Linguistics.
$3
174558
690
$a
0460
690
$a
0351
690
$a
0290
710
2
$a
Portland State University.
$b
Speech and Hearing Sciences.
$3
629860
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
54-06(E).
790
$a
0180
791
$a
M.S.
792
$a
2015
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1592922
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1592922
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入