語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
God and mental causation[electronic ...
~
Lim, Daniel.
God and mental causation[electronic resource] /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
201.61
書名/作者:
God and mental causation/ by Daniel Lim.
作者:
Lim, Daniel.
出版者:
Berlin, Heidelberg : : Springer Berlin Heidelberg :, 2015.
面頁冊數:
xiv, 100 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:
Springer eBooks
標題:
Philosophy and religion.
標題:
Philosophy of mind.
標題:
Philosophy.
標題:
Philosophy of Religion.
標題:
Religious Studies.
標題:
Philosophy of Mind.
ISBN:
9783662474266 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:
9783662474259 (paper)
內容註:
Chapter 1: The Supervenience Argument -- Chapter 2: Occasionalism -- Chapter 3: Overdetermination and Exclusion -- Chapter 4: The Existence of God.
摘要、提要註:
This book lies at the intersection of philosophy of mind and philosophy of religion and operates on the assumption that dialogue between the two disciplines can be fruitful. In particular it focuses on how debates in the philosophy of mind regarding the nature of mental causation relate to debates in the philosophy of religion regarding divine action, creaturely causation, and existence of God. The book is divided into two parts. The first deals with Jaegwon Kim's so-called Supervenience Argument (SA) against non-reductive physicalism. One important observation is that the structural similarities between non-reductive physicalism and 'orthodox' theism make it convenient to co-opt non-reductive physicalist solutions to the SA in defending the possibility of creaturely causation in the philosophy of religion. The SA is used as a foil to discuss the relative merits of Malebranche's so-called Conservation is Continuous Creation Argument for Occasionalism (CCCA) Moverover, the so-called compatibilist strategy (Karen Bennett 2003, 2009) for developing a non-reductive physicalist response to the Supervenience Argument is defended and developed. This strategy is then deployed in the philosophy of religion to defend the possibility of creaturely causation against the CCCA.
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6
God and mental causation[electronic resource] /
Lim, Daniel.
God and mental causation
[electronic resource] /by Daniel Lim. - Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg :2015. - xiv, 100 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in philosophy,2211-4548. - SpringerBriefs in philosophy..
Chapter 1: The Supervenience Argument -- Chapter 2: Occasionalism -- Chapter 3: Overdetermination and Exclusion -- Chapter 4: The Existence of God.
This book lies at the intersection of philosophy of mind and philosophy of religion and operates on the assumption that dialogue between the two disciplines can be fruitful. In particular it focuses on how debates in the philosophy of mind regarding the nature of mental causation relate to debates in the philosophy of religion regarding divine action, creaturely causation, and existence of God. The book is divided into two parts. The first deals with Jaegwon Kim's so-called Supervenience Argument (SA) against non-reductive physicalism. One important observation is that the structural similarities between non-reductive physicalism and 'orthodox' theism make it convenient to co-opt non-reductive physicalist solutions to the SA in defending the possibility of creaturely causation in the philosophy of religion. The SA is used as a foil to discuss the relative merits of Malebranche's so-called Conservation is Continuous Creation Argument for Occasionalism (CCCA) Moverover, the so-called compatibilist strategy (Karen Bennett 2003, 2009) for developing a non-reductive physicalist response to the Supervenience Argument is defended and developed. This strategy is then deployed in the philosophy of religion to defend the possibility of creaturely causation against the CCCA.
ISBN: 9783662474266 (electronic bk.)
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
484990
Philosophy and religion.
LC Class. No.: BL51
Dewey Class. No.: 201.61
God and mental causation[electronic resource] /
LDR
:02408nam a2200325 a 4500
001
439493
003
DE-He213
005
20160203140531.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
160322s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020
$a
9783662474266 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
9783662474259 (paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-662-47426-6
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
BL51
072
7
$a
HRAB
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
PHI022000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
201.61
$2
23
090
$a
BL51
$b
.L732 2015
100
1
$a
Lim, Daniel.
$3
627474
245
1 0
$a
God and mental causation
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
by Daniel Lim.
260
$a
Berlin, Heidelberg :
$b
Springer Berlin Heidelberg :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2015.
300
$a
xiv, 100 p. :
$b
ill., digital ;
$c
24 cm.
490
1
$a
SpringerBriefs in philosophy,
$x
2211-4548
505
0
$a
Chapter 1: The Supervenience Argument -- Chapter 2: Occasionalism -- Chapter 3: Overdetermination and Exclusion -- Chapter 4: The Existence of God.
520
$a
This book lies at the intersection of philosophy of mind and philosophy of religion and operates on the assumption that dialogue between the two disciplines can be fruitful. In particular it focuses on how debates in the philosophy of mind regarding the nature of mental causation relate to debates in the philosophy of religion regarding divine action, creaturely causation, and existence of God. The book is divided into two parts. The first deals with Jaegwon Kim's so-called Supervenience Argument (SA) against non-reductive physicalism. One important observation is that the structural similarities between non-reductive physicalism and 'orthodox' theism make it convenient to co-opt non-reductive physicalist solutions to the SA in defending the possibility of creaturely causation in the philosophy of religion. The SA is used as a foil to discuss the relative merits of Malebranche's so-called Conservation is Continuous Creation Argument for Occasionalism (CCCA) Moverover, the so-called compatibilist strategy (Karen Bennett 2003, 2009) for developing a non-reductive physicalist response to the Supervenience Argument is defended and developed. This strategy is then deployed in the philosophy of religion to defend the possibility of creaturely causation against the CCCA.
650
0
$a
Philosophy and religion.
$3
484990
650
0
$a
Philosophy of mind.
$3
191690
650
1 4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
179430
650
2 4
$a
Philosophy of Religion.
$3
464087
650
2 4
$a
Religious Studies.
$3
465689
650
2 4
$a
Philosophy of Mind.
$3
465128
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
463450
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
830
0
$a
SpringerBriefs in philosophy.
$3
468414
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6
950
$a
Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47426-6
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入