大葉大學圖書館 |

Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions[electronic resource] /

レコード種別:	コンピュータ・メディア : 単行資料
[NT 15000414] null:	340.9
タイトル / 著者:	Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions/ by Eva Steiner.
著者:	Steiner, Eva.
出版された:	Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2015.
記述:	xi, 382 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
主題:
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :	9783319161754 (electronic bk.)
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :	9783319161747 (paper)
[NT 15000229] null:	This work deals with the temporal effect of judicial decisions, and more specifically, with the hardship caused by the retroactive operation of overruling decisions. By means of a jurisprudential and comparative analysis, the book explores several issues created by the overruling of earlier decisions. Overruling of earlier decisions, when it occurs, operates retrospectively with the effect that it infringes the principle of legal certainty through upsetting any previous arrangements made by a party to a case under long standing precedents established previously by the courts. On this account, in the recent past, a number of jurisdictions have had to deal with the prospect of introducing in their own systems the well-established US practice of prospective overruling whereby the court may announce in advance that it will change the relevant rule or interpretation of the rule but only for future cases. However, adopting prospective overruling raises a series of issues mainly related to the constitutional limits of the judicial function coupled?with the practical difficulties attendant upon such a practice. This book answers a number of the questions raised by this practice. It makes use of the great reservoir of foreign legal experience that furnishes theoretical and practical ideas from which national judges may draw their knowledge and inspiration in order to be able to advise a rational method of dealing with time when they give their decisions.#

Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions[electronic resource] /
Steiner, Eva.

Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions[electronic resource] /by Eva Steiner. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xi, 382 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ius comparatum - global studies in comparative law,v.32214-6881 ;.

This work deals with the temporal effect of judicial decisions, and more specifically, with the hardship caused by the retroactive operation of overruling decisions. By means of a jurisprudential and comparative analysis, the book explores several issues created by the overruling of earlier decisions. Overruling of earlier decisions, when it occurs, operates retrospectively with the effect that it infringes the principle of legal certainty through upsetting any previous arrangements made by a party to a case under long standing precedents established previously by the courts. On this account, in the recent past, a number of jurisdictions have had to deal with the prospect of introducing in their own systems the well-established US practice of prospective overruling whereby the court may announce in advance that it will change the relevant rule or interpretation of the rule but only for future cases. However, adopting prospective overruling raises a series of issues mainly related to the constitutional limits of the judicial function coupled?with the practical difficulties attendant upon such a practice. This book answers a number of the questions raised by this practice. It makes use of the great reservoir of foreign legal experience that furnishes theoretical and practical ideas from which national judges may draw their knowledge and inspiration in order to be able to advise a rational method of dealing with time when they give their decisions.#

ISBN: 9783319161754 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-16175-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

353965

LC Class. No.: K7040

Dewey Class. No.: 340.9

Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions[electronic resource] /
LDR:02392nmm a2200301 a 4500 001 438933
003 DE-He213
005 20151230171739.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 160315s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319161754 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319161747 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-16175-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-16175-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K7040
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAW016000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 340.9 $2 23
090 $a K7040 $b .S822 2015
100 1 $a Steiner, Eva. $3 626460
245 1 0 $a Comparing the prospective effect of judicial rulings across jurisdictions $h [electronic resource] / $c by Eva Steiner.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xi, 382 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ius comparatum - global studies in comparative law, $x 2214-6881 ; $v v.3
520 $a This work deals with the temporal effect of judicial decisions, and more specifically, with the hardship caused by the retroactive operation of overruling decisions. By means of a jurisprudential and comparative analysis, the book explores several issues created by the overruling of earlier decisions. Overruling of earlier decisions, when it occurs, operates retrospectively with the effect that it infringes the principle of legal certainty through upsetting any previous arrangements made by a party to a case under long standing precedents established previously by the courts. On this account, in the recent past, a number of jurisdictions have had to deal with the prospect of introducing in their own systems the well-established US practice of prospective overruling whereby the court may announce in advance that it will change the relevant rule or interpretation of the rule but only for future cases. However, adopting prospective overruling raises a series of issues mainly related to the constitutional limits of the judicial function coupled?with the practical difficulties attendant upon such a practice. This book answers a number of the questions raised by this practice. It makes use of the great reservoir of foreign legal experience that furnishes theoretical and practical ideas from which national judges may draw their knowledge and inspiration in order to be able to advise a rational method of dealing with time when they give their decisions.#
650 0 $2 lcstt. $3 353965
710 $7 aProject Muse. $3 540276
830 0 $3 626084