語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Interdisciplinary research and trans...
~
Gethmann, C.F.
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims[electronic resource] /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
001.4
書名/作者:
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims/ by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.].
其他作者:
Gethmann, C.F.
出版者:
Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2015.
面頁冊數:
xvi, 195 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:
Springer eBooks
標題:
Knowledge - Discourse.
標題:
Interdisciplinary research.
標題:
Philosophy.
標題:
Philosophy of Science.
標題:
R & D/Technology Policy.
ISBN:
9783319114002 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:
9783319113999 (paper)
內容註:
Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
摘要、提要註:
Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims[electronic resource] /
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
[electronic resource] /by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.]. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xvi, 195 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ethics of science and technology assessment,v.431860-4803 ;. - Ethics of science and technology assessment ;v.43..
Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
ISBN: 9783319114002 (electronic bk.)
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
588992
Knowledge - Discourse.
LC Class. No.: Q180.55.I48
Dewey Class. No.: 001.4
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims[electronic resource] /
LDR
:02215nam a2200325 a 4500
001
424962
003
DE-He213
005
20150617143921.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
151119s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020
$a
9783319114002 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
9783319113999 (paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-319-11400-2
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
Q180.55.I48
072
7
$a
PDA
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
SCI075000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
001.4
$2
23
090
$a
Q180.55.I48
$b
I61 2015
245
0 0
$a
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.].
260
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2015.
300
$a
xvi, 195 p. :
$b
ill., digital ;
$c
24 cm.
490
1
$a
Ethics of science and technology assessment,
$x
1860-4803 ;
$v
v.43
505
0
$a
Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
520
$a
Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
650
2 4
$a
Knowledge - Discourse.
$3
588992
650
0
$a
Interdisciplinary research.
$3
337877
650
1 4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
179430
650
2 4
$a
Philosophy of Science.
$3
464591
650
2 4
$a
R & D/Technology Policy.
$3
464214
700
1
$a
Gethmann, C.F.
$3
603343
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
463450
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
830
0
$a
Ethics of science and technology assessment ;
$v
v.43.
$3
603344
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
950
$a
Engineering (Springer-11647)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入