語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Choosing your battles[electronic res...
~
Feaver, Peter.
Choosing your battles[electronic resource] :American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
322.50973
書名/作者:
Choosing your battles : American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword // by the authors Peter D. Feaver and Christopher Gelpi.
作者:
Feaver, Peter.
其他作者:
Gelpi, Christopher,
出版者:
Princeton : : Princeton University Press,, 2005.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (xiii, 250 p.)
標題:
Civil-military relations - United States.
標題:
War and emergency powers - United States.
ISBN:
9781400841455 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:
1400841453 (electronic bk.)
書目註:
Includes bibliographical references (p. 215-228) and indexes.
內容註:
The civil-military opinion gap over the use of force -- The impact of elite veterans on American decisions to use force -- Casualty sensitivity and civil-military relations -- Exploring the determination of casualty sensitivity.
摘要、提要註:
America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish voices in government were civilians who had not served in uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that this civilian-military argument--which has characterized earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new afterword by Peter Feav.
電子資源:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sfk2
Choosing your battles[electronic resource] :American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /
Feaver, Peter.
Choosing your battles
American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /[electronic resource] :by the authors Peter D. Feaver and Christopher Gelpi. - Princeton :Princeton University Press,2005. - 1 online resource (xiii, 250 p.)
Includes bibliographical references (p. 215-228) and indexes.
The civil-military opinion gap over the use of force -- The impact of elite veterans on American decisions to use force -- Casualty sensitivity and civil-military relations -- Exploring the determination of casualty sensitivity.
America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish voices in government were civilians who had not served in uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that this civilian-military argument--which has characterized earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new afterword by Peter Feav.
ISBN: 9781400841455 (electronic bk.)Subjects--Topical Terms:
540584
Civil-military relations
--United States.
LC Class. No.: JK330 / .F434 2011
Dewey Class. No.: 322.50973
Choosing your battles[electronic resource] :American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /
LDR
:01927cam a2200301Ka 4500
001
415716
003
OCoLC
005
20141031030036.0
006
m o d
007
cr cnu---unuuu
008
150203s2005 nju ob 001 0 eng d
020
$a
9781400841455 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
1400841453 (electronic bk.)
020
$z
0691124272
020
$z
9780691124278
035
$a
(OCoLC)759398156
$z
(OCoLC)833583040
035
$a
ocn759398156
040
$a
N
$b
eng
$e
pn
$c
N
$d
EBLCP
$d
E7B
$d
REDDC
$d
OCLCQ
$d
MHW
$d
JSTOR
$d
OCLCF
$d
DEBSZ
$d
HEBIS
$d
OCLCO
$d
OCLCQ
043
$a
n-us---
050
4
$a
JK330
$b
.F434 2011
082
0 4
$a
322.50973
$2
22
100
1
$a
Feaver, Peter.
$3
586950
245
1 0
$a
Choosing your battles
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /
$c
by the authors Peter D. Feaver and Christopher Gelpi.
260
$a
Princeton :
$b
Princeton University Press,
$c
2005.
300
$a
1 online resource (xiii, 250 p.)
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references (p. 215-228) and indexes.
505
0
$a
The civil-military opinion gap over the use of force -- The impact of elite veterans on American decisions to use force -- Casualty sensitivity and civil-military relations -- Exploring the determination of casualty sensitivity.
520
$a
America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish voices in government were civilians who had not served in uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that this civilian-military argument--which has characterized earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new afterword by Peter Feav.
588
0
$a
Print version record.
650
0
$a
Civil-military relations
$z
United States.
$3
540584
650
0
$a
War and emergency powers
$z
United States.
$3
379265
700
1
$a
Gelpi, Christopher,
$d
1966-
$3
586951
856
4 0
$u
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sfk2
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sfk2
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入