語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The Indian law legacy of Thurgood Ma...
~
Knowles, F. E. (Jr.,) (1957-)
The Indian law legacy of Thurgood Marshall /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
342.73088
書名/作者:
The Indian law legacy of Thurgood Marshall // Fred E. Knowles.
作者:
Knowles, F. E.
標題:
Indians of North America - Legal status, laws, etc.
ISBN:
1137433396 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:
9781137433398 (electronic bk.)
內容註:
1. Abstract -- 2. Introduction - Marshall and Majoritarianism -- 3. Historical Background of Indian Law -- 4. Laurence's Analytical Paradigm -- 5. The Case Law -- 6. Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma -- 7. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission -- 8. United States v. Mason -- 9. Rosebud Sioux v. Kneip -- 10. Oliphant v. Suquamish Tribe -- 11. Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez -- 12. Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation -- 13. United States v. Mitchell (Mitchell 1) -- 14. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker/ Central Machinery Company v. Arizona State Tax Commission -- 15. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe -- 16. Ramah Navajo School Board v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico -- 17. New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe -- 18. United States v. Mitchell (Mitchell 2) -- 19. Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe -- 20. Laurence's Conclusions -- 21. Additional Case Law -- 22. Solem v. Bartlett -- 23. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife v. Klamath Tribe -- 24. United States v. Dion -- 25. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. LaPlante -- 26. Summary and Conclusion -- 27. Works Cited -- 28. Case Law Cited -- 29. Statutory Law and Treaties Cited -- Appendix One. Voting Blocs in Cited Cases.
摘要、提要註:
For much of the 20th century, Thurgood Marshall was a pioneer in advocacy for the disenfranchised, ground under the wheels of American Justice. In view of his activism as a law student at Howard, a protege of Charles Houston, and then as advocate and chief counsel for the NAACP Legal defense Fund, no one can question his legitimacy as a catalyst for social justice. What then of his career on the Supreme Court. How might that passion for social justice translate in his decisions of our highest court? An examination of his published opinions in cases involving Indian law should show the extent to which that idealism matured as legal principle.This work endeavors, then, to examine nineteen published Indian law decisions, dating from 1970 to 1987. Using the analytical paradigms suggested by Laurence, Hanna, and Tsosie, these decisions will be mined to expose the reasoning and logic that informed them. Some of Marshall's opinions are written for the majority, at times unanimous, but generally contentious. Others of his opinions come from his published dissents. One finds Marshall frequently at odds with Justice Powell and Justice Rehnquist. What emerges is, with rare exception, a consistency of thought and reason throughout Justice Marshall's opinions. His rationale was based on a consistent view of sovereignty, an adherence to the canon of construction in Indian law, and his view that legislative intent must be clearly articulated. Undergirding all of his work was the knowledge that American Justice had and was frequently used to promote injustice and social inequity.
電子資源:
http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137433398
The Indian law legacy of Thurgood Marshall /
Knowles, F. E.Jr.,1957-
The Indian law legacy of Thurgood Marshall /
Fred E. Knowles.
1. Abstract -- 2. Introduction - Marshall and Majoritarianism -- 3. Historical Background of Indian Law -- 4. Laurence's Analytical Paradigm -- 5. The Case Law -- 6. Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma -- 7. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission -- 8. United States v. Mason -- 9. Rosebud Sioux v. Kneip -- 10. Oliphant v. Suquamish Tribe -- 11. Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez -- 12. Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation -- 13. United States v. Mitchell (Mitchell 1) -- 14. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker/ Central Machinery Company v. Arizona State Tax Commission -- 15. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe -- 16. Ramah Navajo School Board v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico -- 17. New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe -- 18. United States v. Mitchell (Mitchell 2) -- 19. Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe -- 20. Laurence's Conclusions -- 21. Additional Case Law -- 22. Solem v. Bartlett -- 23. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife v. Klamath Tribe -- 24. United States v. Dion -- 25. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. LaPlante -- 26. Summary and Conclusion -- 27. Works Cited -- 28. Case Law Cited -- 29. Statutory Law and Treaties Cited -- Appendix One. Voting Blocs in Cited Cases.
For much of the 20th century, Thurgood Marshall was a pioneer in advocacy for the disenfranchised, ground under the wheels of American Justice. In view of his activism as a law student at Howard, a protege of Charles Houston, and then as advocate and chief counsel for the NAACP Legal defense Fund, no one can question his legitimacy as a catalyst for social justice. What then of his career on the Supreme Court. How might that passion for social justice translate in his decisions of our highest court? An examination of his published opinions in cases involving Indian law should show the extent to which that idealism matured as legal principle.This work endeavors, then, to examine nineteen published Indian law decisions, dating from 1970 to 1987. Using the analytical paradigms suggested by Laurence, Hanna, and Tsosie, these decisions will be mined to expose the reasoning and logic that informed them. Some of Marshall's opinions are written for the majority, at times unanimous, but generally contentious. Others of his opinions come from his published dissents. One finds Marshall frequently at odds with Justice Powell and Justice Rehnquist. What emerges is, with rare exception, a consistency of thought and reason throughout Justice Marshall's opinions. His rationale was based on a consistent view of sovereignty, an adherence to the canon of construction in Indian law, and his view that legislative intent must be clearly articulated. Undergirding all of his work was the knowledge that American Justice had and was frequently used to promote injustice and social inequity.
ISBN: 1137433396 (electronic bk.)
Source: 764431Palgrave Macmillanhttp://www.palgraveconnect.comSubjects--Personal Names:
576947
Marshall, Thurgood,
1908-1993.Subjects--Topical Terms:
392982
Indians of North America
--Legal status, laws, etc.Index Terms--Genre/Form:
336502
Electronic books.
LC Class. No.: KF8204.5
Dewey Class. No.: 342.73088
The Indian law legacy of Thurgood Marshall /
LDR
:03872cam a2200313Ki 4500
001
410921
003
OCoLC
005
20140910115807.0
006
m o d
007
cr cnu---unuuu
008
141231s2014 enk ol 000 0 eng d
020
$a
1137433396 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
9781137433398 (electronic bk.)
035
$a
(OCoLC)871401151
035
$a
ocn871401151
037
$a
764431
$b
Palgrave Macmillan
$n
http://www.palgraveconnect.com
040
$a
UKPGM
$b
eng
$e
rda
$e
pn
$c
UKPGM
$d
IDEBK
$d
CDX
$d
EXW
$d
OCLCO
$d
OCLCF
043
$a
n-us---
049
$a
TEFA
050
4
$a
KF8204.5
082
0 4
$a
342.73088
$2
23
100
1
$a
Knowles, F. E.
$q
(Fred E.),
$c
Jr.,
$d
1957-
$e
author.
$3
576946
245
1 4
$a
The Indian law legacy of Thurgood Marshall /
$c
Fred E. Knowles.
264
1
$a
[Basingstoke] :
$b
Palgrave Pivot,
$c
2014.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
505
0
$a
1. Abstract -- 2. Introduction - Marshall and Majoritarianism -- 3. Historical Background of Indian Law -- 4. Laurence's Analytical Paradigm -- 5. The Case Law -- 6. Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma -- 7. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission -- 8. United States v. Mason -- 9. Rosebud Sioux v. Kneip -- 10. Oliphant v. Suquamish Tribe -- 11. Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez -- 12. Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation -- 13. United States v. Mitchell (Mitchell 1) -- 14. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker/ Central Machinery Company v. Arizona State Tax Commission -- 15. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe -- 16. Ramah Navajo School Board v. Bureau of Revenue of New Mexico -- 17. New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe -- 18. United States v. Mitchell (Mitchell 2) -- 19. Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe -- 20. Laurence's Conclusions -- 21. Additional Case Law -- 22. Solem v. Bartlett -- 23. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife v. Klamath Tribe -- 24. United States v. Dion -- 25. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. LaPlante -- 26. Summary and Conclusion -- 27. Works Cited -- 28. Case Law Cited -- 29. Statutory Law and Treaties Cited -- Appendix One. Voting Blocs in Cited Cases.
520
$a
For much of the 20th century, Thurgood Marshall was a pioneer in advocacy for the disenfranchised, ground under the wheels of American Justice. In view of his activism as a law student at Howard, a protege of Charles Houston, and then as advocate and chief counsel for the NAACP Legal defense Fund, no one can question his legitimacy as a catalyst for social justice. What then of his career on the Supreme Court. How might that passion for social justice translate in his decisions of our highest court? An examination of his published opinions in cases involving Indian law should show the extent to which that idealism matured as legal principle.This work endeavors, then, to examine nineteen published Indian law decisions, dating from 1970 to 1987. Using the analytical paradigms suggested by Laurence, Hanna, and Tsosie, these decisions will be mined to expose the reasoning and logic that informed them. Some of Marshall's opinions are written for the majority, at times unanimous, but generally contentious. Others of his opinions come from his published dissents. One finds Marshall frequently at odds with Justice Powell and Justice Rehnquist. What emerges is, with rare exception, a consistency of thought and reason throughout Justice Marshall's opinions. His rationale was based on a consistent view of sovereignty, an adherence to the canon of construction in Indian law, and his view that legislative intent must be clearly articulated. Undergirding all of his work was the knowledge that American Justice had and was frequently used to promote injustice and social inequity.
588
$a
Description based on publisher supplied information; title not viewed.
600
1 0
$a
Marshall, Thurgood,
$d
1908-1993.
$3
576947
650
0
$a
Indians of North America
$x
Legal status, laws, etc.
$3
392982
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
336502
655
7
$a
Trials, litigation, etc.
$2
fast
$3
574367
710
2
$a
Palgrave Connect (Online service)
$3
370384
856
4 0
$3
Palgrave Connect
$u
http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137433398
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137433398
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入