語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Neuro imaging[electronic resource] /
~
Bonfante, Eliana.
Neuro imaging[electronic resource] /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
616.8/047572
書名/作者:
Neuro imaging/ edited by Roy Riascos, Eliana Bonfante.
其他作者:
Riascos, Roy.
出版者:
New York : : Thieme,, c2010.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (212 p.) : : ill.
標題:
Nervous system - Case studies. - Radiography
標題:
Central Nervous System Diseases - radiography
標題:
Central Nervous System - Case Reports. - radiography
標題:
Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological - Atlases.
ISBN:
9781604061901 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:
1604061901 (electronic bk.)
書目註:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
摘要、提要註:
This book is not intended to teach neuroradiology--it is only a review of the most frequent pathologies and serves as a tool to be able to tell them apart. Of course, telling them apart is not always possible, and that is the whole trick of giving a pertinent set of differential diagnoses and trying to favor one over the other. Our advice is to always look at the first image and try to describe as much as you can, as if it was the only image you had available, then go through the rest of the images and see if the thought process was similar. It would be impossible to include all the pertinent differential diagnoses for each case with the format limitation of three differential diagnoses per case. This way of teaching imaging analysis can both be similar to and very different from your daily clinical practice. Often, the pertinent finding or telltale sign to achieve a diagnosis lies in just a few of the images within an entire examination; however, you have to see the entire case and find these. Here, images that have been deemed key by someone else are selected, giving you the advantage of a focused search but the limitation of a narrow representation. You may find yourself frustrated by offering a totally different differential diagnosis from the one presented to you here, but be aware that the same case can have a completely different approach based on the way it is presented, the order of the images, or the finding in which you are focusing your process of thought. Additional references are provided to help you widen the scope of your review, especially in subjects that you may find more challenging or controversial--Provided by publisher.
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/b-002-85504
Neuro imaging[electronic resource] /
Neuro imaging
[electronic resource] /edited by Roy Riascos, Eliana Bonfante. - New York :Thieme,c2010. - 1 online resource (212 p.) :ill. - RadCases. - RadCases..
Includes bibliographical references and index.
This book is not intended to teach neuroradiology--it is only a review of the most frequent pathologies and serves as a tool to be able to tell them apart. Of course, telling them apart is not always possible, and that is the whole trick of giving a pertinent set of differential diagnoses and trying to favor one over the other. Our advice is to always look at the first image and try to describe as much as you can, as if it was the only image you had available, then go through the rest of the images and see if the thought process was similar. It would be impossible to include all the pertinent differential diagnoses for each case with the format limitation of three differential diagnoses per case. This way of teaching imaging analysis can both be similar to and very different from your daily clinical practice. Often, the pertinent finding or telltale sign to achieve a diagnosis lies in just a few of the images within an entire examination; however, you have to see the entire case and find these. Here, images that have been deemed key by someone else are selected, giving you the advantage of a focused search but the limitation of a narrow representation. You may find yourself frustrated by offering a totally different differential diagnosis from the one presented to you here, but be aware that the same case can have a completely different approach based on the way it is presented, the order of the images, or the finding in which you are focusing your process of thought. Additional references are provided to help you widen the scope of your review, especially in subjects that you may find more challenging or controversial--Provided by publisher.
ISBN: 9781604061901 (electronic bk.)Subjects--Topical Terms:
557809
Nervous system
--Radiography--Case studies.Index Terms--Genre/Form:
336502
Electronic books.
LC Class. No.: RC349.R3 / N33 2010eb
Dewey Class. No.: 616.8/047572
National Library of Medicine Call No.: 2010 L-969
Neuro imaging[electronic resource] /
LDR
:02566cam a2200277Ka 4500
001
400469
006
m o d
007
cr cnu---unuuu
008
160811s2010 nyua ob 001 0 eng d
020
$a
9781604061901 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
1604061901 (electronic bk.)
020
$z
9781604061895
020
$z
1604061898
035
$a
ocn847527400
040
$a
N
$c
N
$d
CDX
$d
COO
$d
OCLCO
$d
YDXCP
$d
E7B
050
4
$a
RC349.R3
$b
N33 2010eb
060
1 4
$a
2010 L-969
060
1 4
$a
WL 141
$b
N4825 2010
082
0 4
$a
616.8/047572
$2
22
245
0 0
$a
Neuro imaging
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
edited by Roy Riascos, Eliana Bonfante.
260
$a
New York :
$b
Thieme,
$c
c2010.
300
$a
1 online resource (212 p.) :
$b
ill.
490
1
$a
RadCases
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references and index.
520
$a
This book is not intended to teach neuroradiology--it is only a review of the most frequent pathologies and serves as a tool to be able to tell them apart. Of course, telling them apart is not always possible, and that is the whole trick of giving a pertinent set of differential diagnoses and trying to favor one over the other. Our advice is to always look at the first image and try to describe as much as you can, as if it was the only image you had available, then go through the rest of the images and see if the thought process was similar. It would be impossible to include all the pertinent differential diagnoses for each case with the format limitation of three differential diagnoses per case. This way of teaching imaging analysis can both be similar to and very different from your daily clinical practice. Often, the pertinent finding or telltale sign to achieve a diagnosis lies in just a few of the images within an entire examination; however, you have to see the entire case and find these. Here, images that have been deemed key by someone else are selected, giving you the advantage of a focused search but the limitation of a narrow representation. You may find yourself frustrated by offering a totally different differential diagnosis from the one presented to you here, but be aware that the same case can have a completely different approach based on the way it is presented, the order of the images, or the finding in which you are focusing your process of thought. Additional references are provided to help you widen the scope of your review, especially in subjects that you may find more challenging or controversial--Provided by publisher.
588
$a
Description based on print version record.
650
0
$a
Nervous system
$x
Radiography
$v
Case studies.
$3
557809
650
1 2
$a
Central Nervous System Diseases
$x
radiography
$3
402689
650
2 2
$a
Central Nervous System
$x
radiography
$v
Case Reports.
$3
557810
650
2 2
$a
Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological
$v
Atlases.
$3
401433
655
4
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
336502
700
1
$a
Riascos, Roy.
$3
557806
700
1
$a
Bonfante, Eliana.
$3
557807
830
0
$a
RadCases.
$3
557808
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/b-002-85504
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/b-002-85504
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入