語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Political reason[electronic resource...
~
Fives, Allyn.
Political reason[electronic resource] :morality and the public sphere /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
320.01
書名/作者:
Political reason : morality and the public sphere // Allyn Fives.
作者:
Fives, Allyn.
出版者:
Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire : : Palgrave Macmillan,, 2012.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource.
標題:
Political science - Philosophy.
標題:
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / Democracy.
標題:
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General.
標題:
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / National.
標題:
PHILOSOPHY / Political
ISBN:
9781137291622 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:
1137291621 (electronic bk.)
書目註:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
內容註:
Introduction : Political Reason After the Enlightenment -- Reason and Tradition -- Reason and Faith -- Agonism -- Reasonableness -- Civic Education for Democracy -- Global Distributive Justice.
摘要、提要註:
In modern democratic societies, the plurality of differing and conflicting moral doctrines stands alongside a commitment to resolve political disputes through the use of moral reasoning. Given the fact of moral pluralism, how can there be moral resolutions to political disputes? What type of moral reasoning is appropriate in the public sphere? These questions are explored through a close and critical analysis of the work of Alasdair MacIntyre and Rawls. In this book it is argued that the anti-Enlightenment work of Alasdair MacIntyre, along with post-modernists, fails on epistemological, ethical, and political grounds, while in contrast, Rawls's 'core conception of reasonableness,' which is a type of political reasoning carried out 'in the manner of' the Enlightenment, is better placed to successfully respond to the moral disputes of contemporary politics. The practical application of these ideas is also explored in discussions of civic education and global distributive justice.
電子資源:
http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137291622
Political reason[electronic resource] :morality and the public sphere /
Fives, Allyn.
Political reason
morality and the public sphere /[electronic resource] :Allyn Fives. - Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire :Palgrave Macmillan,2012. - 1 online resource.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Introduction : Political Reason After the Enlightenment -- Reason and Tradition -- Reason and Faith -- Agonism -- Reasonableness -- Civic Education for Democracy -- Global Distributive Justice.
In modern democratic societies, the plurality of differing and conflicting moral doctrines stands alongside a commitment to resolve political disputes through the use of moral reasoning. Given the fact of moral pluralism, how can there be moral resolutions to political disputes? What type of moral reasoning is appropriate in the public sphere? These questions are explored through a close and critical analysis of the work of Alasdair MacIntyre and Rawls. In this book it is argued that the anti-Enlightenment work of Alasdair MacIntyre, along with post-modernists, fails on epistemological, ethical, and political grounds, while in contrast, Rawls's 'core conception of reasonableness,' which is a type of political reasoning carried out 'in the manner of' the Enlightenment, is better placed to successfully respond to the moral disputes of contemporary politics. The practical application of these ideas is also explored in discussions of civic education and global distributive justice.
ISBN: 9781137291622 (electronic bk.)
Source: 382874Palgrave Macmillanhttp://www.palgraveconnect.com
Nat. Bib. Agency Control No.: 016135151UkSubjects--Topical Terms:
341429
Political science
--Philosophy.Index Terms--Genre/Form:
336502
Electronic books.
LC Class. No.: JA71 / .F527 2012
Dewey Class. No.: 320.01
Political reason[electronic resource] :morality and the public sphere /
LDR
:03809cam 2200457Ka 4500
001
388762
003
OCoLC
005
20130621115134.0
006
m o d
007
cr cn|||||||||
008
131001s2012 enk ob 001 0 eng d
016
7
$a
016135151
$2
Uk
019
$a
820631038
020
$a
9781137291622 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
1137291621 (electronic bk.)
020
$z
023023898X
020
$z
9780230238985
020
$z
9781283867597
020
$z
1283867591
035
$a
(OCoLC)819421452
$z
(OCoLC)820631038
035
$a
ocn819421452
037
$a
382874
$b
Palgrave Macmillan
$n
http://www.palgraveconnect.com
040
$a
UKPGM
$b
eng
$c
UKPGM
$d
CDX
$d
OCLCO
$d
N$T
$d
YDXCP
$d
UKMGB
049
$a
TEFA
050
4
$a
JA71
$b
.F527 2012
072
7
$a
PHI
$x
019000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
320.01
$2
23
084
$a
POL007000
$a
POL028000
$a
POL030000
$2
bisacsh
100
1
$a
Fives, Allyn.
$3
527019
245
1 0
$a
Political reason
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
morality and the public sphere /
$c
Allyn Fives.
260
$a
Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire :
$b
Palgrave Macmillan,
$c
2012.
300
$a
1 online resource.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references and index.
505
0
$a
Introduction : Political Reason After the Enlightenment -- Reason and Tradition -- Reason and Faith -- Agonism -- Reasonableness -- Civic Education for Democracy -- Global Distributive Justice.
520
$a
In modern democratic societies, the plurality of differing and conflicting moral doctrines stands alongside a commitment to resolve political disputes through the use of moral reasoning. Given the fact of moral pluralism, how can there be moral resolutions to political disputes? What type of moral reasoning is appropriate in the public sphere? These questions are explored through a close and critical analysis of the work of Alasdair MacIntyre and Rawls. In this book it is argued that the anti-Enlightenment work of Alasdair MacIntyre, along with post-modernists, fails on epistemological, ethical, and political grounds, while in contrast, Rawls's 'core conception of reasonableness,' which is a type of political reasoning carried out 'in the manner of' the Enlightenment, is better placed to successfully respond to the moral disputes of contemporary politics. The practical application of these ideas is also explored in discussions of civic education and global distributive justice.
520
$a
"In modern democratic societies, the plurality of differing and conflicting moral doctrines stands alongside a commitment to resolve political disputes through the use of moral reasoning. Given the fact of moral pluralism, how can there be moral resolutions to political disputes? What type of moral reasoning is appropriate in the public sphere? These questions are explored through a close and critical analysis of the work of Alasdair MacIntyre and Rawls. In this book it is argued that the anti-Enlightenment work of Alasdair MacIntyre, along with post-modernists, fails on epistemological, ethical, and political grounds, while in contrast, Rawls's 'core conception of reasonableness,' which is a type of political reasoning carried out 'in the manner of' the Enlightenment, is better placed to successfully respond to the moral disputes of contemporary politics. The practical application of these ideas is also explored in discussions of civic education and global distributive justice. "--
$c
Provided by publisher.
588
$a
Description based on print version record.
650
0
$a
Political science
$x
Philosophy.
$3
341429
650
7
$a
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Ideologies / Democracy.
$2
bisacsh
$3
472527
650
7
$a
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General.
$2
bisacsh
$3
473408
650
7
$a
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / National.
$2
bisacsh
$3
473420
650
7
$a
PHILOSOPHY / Political
$2
bisacsh
$3
473715
655
4
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
336502
776
0 8
$i
Print version:
$a
Fives, Allyn.
$t
Political reason
$z
9780230238985
$w
(DLC) 2012034811
$w
(OCoLC)805011555
856
4 0
$3
Palgrave Connect
$u
http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137291622
938
$a
Coutts Information Services
$b
COUT
$n
24416291
938
$a
EBSCOhost
$b
EBSC
$n
509840
938
$a
YBP Library Services
$b
YANK
$n
9952509
994
$a
C0
$b
TEF
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137291622
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入