語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The German Garden City Movement: Ar...
~
Columbia University.
The German Garden City Movement: Architecture, Politics and Urban Transformation, 1902--1931.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
書名/作者:
The German Garden City Movement: Architecture, Politics and Urban Transformation, 1902--1931.
作者:
Harris, Teresa.
面頁冊數:
397 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-05, Section: A, page: 1597.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International73-05A.
標題:
Art History.
標題:
Architecture.
標題:
Urban and Regional Planning.
ISBN:
9781267158109
摘要、提要註:
This dissertation examines the German garden city movement from aesthetic, economic, and political vantage points in an attempt to determine how the leaders of the Deutsche Gartenstadt-Gesellschaft (German Garden City Association) adapted the English movement to indigenous ideas and conditions. In particular, it gives an account of the central role of the Kampffmeyer cousins in shaping the intellectual framework of the movement. The Kampffmeyers synthesized the work of a variety of German architects and political economists into a coherent platform for the transformation of urban form and urban life. They and their cohorts embraced a model of society based upon collective ownership of land and emphasized communal benefits over individual profit. Despite their leftist leanings, the leaders of the organization divorced their activities from party politics and adopted pragmatic statutes that were vague enough to allow for the participation of more conservative members. The garden city movement overlapped with numerous turn-of-the-century reform efforts, most notably land reform, housing reform, women's rights and temperance, and proponents of the idea aimed to offer a physical space where those reforms could be enacted. Architects involved in the movement, such as Richard Riemerschmid, Heinrich Tessenow, and Bruno Taut, searched for new forms in urban planning and architecture to adequately express the realities of modern life and to facilitate the desired social reforms. Garden city communities were meant to combine the best of city and country and to incorporate both agricultural and industry; their architecture reflected this mixture, drawing on local vernacular styles and standardized, industrial elements. No prescription for the creation of garden city architecture existed other than the demands for simplicity and functionality common in much of the artistic discourse of the time, combined with a desire to give physical expression to the communal nature of the undertakings. This study investigates the full range of garden cities built in Germany, examining lesser-known examples such as Gartenstadt Marienbrunn outside Leipzig and Gartenstadt Stockfeld near Strasbourg, alongside more famous examples like Hellerau. In doing so, it illuminates the diversity of architectural experimentation that took place before World War I and the ways in which the garden cities laid the groundwork for the modernist housing settlements of the Weimar era.
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3494321
The German Garden City Movement: Architecture, Politics and Urban Transformation, 1902--1931.
Harris, Teresa.
The German Garden City Movement: Architecture, Politics and Urban Transformation, 1902--1931.
- 397 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-05, Section: A, page: 1597.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2012.
This dissertation examines the German garden city movement from aesthetic, economic, and political vantage points in an attempt to determine how the leaders of the Deutsche Gartenstadt-Gesellschaft (German Garden City Association) adapted the English movement to indigenous ideas and conditions. In particular, it gives an account of the central role of the Kampffmeyer cousins in shaping the intellectual framework of the movement. The Kampffmeyers synthesized the work of a variety of German architects and political economists into a coherent platform for the transformation of urban form and urban life. They and their cohorts embraced a model of society based upon collective ownership of land and emphasized communal benefits over individual profit. Despite their leftist leanings, the leaders of the organization divorced their activities from party politics and adopted pragmatic statutes that were vague enough to allow for the participation of more conservative members. The garden city movement overlapped with numerous turn-of-the-century reform efforts, most notably land reform, housing reform, women's rights and temperance, and proponents of the idea aimed to offer a physical space where those reforms could be enacted. Architects involved in the movement, such as Richard Riemerschmid, Heinrich Tessenow, and Bruno Taut, searched for new forms in urban planning and architecture to adequately express the realities of modern life and to facilitate the desired social reforms. Garden city communities were meant to combine the best of city and country and to incorporate both agricultural and industry; their architecture reflected this mixture, drawing on local vernacular styles and standardized, industrial elements. No prescription for the creation of garden city architecture existed other than the demands for simplicity and functionality common in much of the artistic discourse of the time, combined with a desire to give physical expression to the communal nature of the undertakings. This study investigates the full range of garden cities built in Germany, examining lesser-known examples such as Gartenstadt Marienbrunn outside Leipzig and Gartenstadt Stockfeld near Strasbourg, alongside more famous examples like Hellerau. In doing so, it illuminates the diversity of architectural experimentation that took place before World War I and the ways in which the garden cities laid the groundwork for the modernist housing settlements of the Weimar era.
ISBN: 9781267158109Subjects--Topical Terms:
423075
Art History.
The German Garden City Movement: Architecture, Politics and Urban Transformation, 1902--1931.
LDR
:03408nam 2200289 4500
001
377863
005
20130403093042.5
008
130522s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781267158109
035
$a
(UMI)AAI3494321
035
$a
AAI3494321
040
$a
UMI
$c
UMI
100
1
$a
Harris, Teresa.
$3
506759
245
1 4
$a
The German Garden City Movement: Architecture, Politics and Urban Transformation, 1902--1931.
300
$a
397 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-05, Section: A, page: 1597.
500
$a
Adviser: Barry G. Bergdoll.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2012.
520
$a
This dissertation examines the German garden city movement from aesthetic, economic, and political vantage points in an attempt to determine how the leaders of the Deutsche Gartenstadt-Gesellschaft (German Garden City Association) adapted the English movement to indigenous ideas and conditions. In particular, it gives an account of the central role of the Kampffmeyer cousins in shaping the intellectual framework of the movement. The Kampffmeyers synthesized the work of a variety of German architects and political economists into a coherent platform for the transformation of urban form and urban life. They and their cohorts embraced a model of society based upon collective ownership of land and emphasized communal benefits over individual profit. Despite their leftist leanings, the leaders of the organization divorced their activities from party politics and adopted pragmatic statutes that were vague enough to allow for the participation of more conservative members. The garden city movement overlapped with numerous turn-of-the-century reform efforts, most notably land reform, housing reform, women's rights and temperance, and proponents of the idea aimed to offer a physical space where those reforms could be enacted. Architects involved in the movement, such as Richard Riemerschmid, Heinrich Tessenow, and Bruno Taut, searched for new forms in urban planning and architecture to adequately express the realities of modern life and to facilitate the desired social reforms. Garden city communities were meant to combine the best of city and country and to incorporate both agricultural and industry; their architecture reflected this mixture, drawing on local vernacular styles and standardized, industrial elements. No prescription for the creation of garden city architecture existed other than the demands for simplicity and functionality common in much of the artistic discourse of the time, combined with a desire to give physical expression to the communal nature of the undertakings. This study investigates the full range of garden cities built in Germany, examining lesser-known examples such as Gartenstadt Marienbrunn outside Leipzig and Gartenstadt Stockfeld near Strasbourg, alongside more famous examples like Hellerau. In doing so, it illuminates the diversity of architectural experimentation that took place before World War I and the ways in which the garden cities laid the groundwork for the modernist housing settlements of the Weimar era.
590
$a
School code: 0054.
650
4
$a
Art History.
$3
423075
650
4
$a
Architecture.
$3
189426
650
4
$a
Urban and Regional Planning.
$3
423395
690
$a
0377
690
$a
0729
690
$a
0999
710
2
$a
Columbia University.
$b
Art History and Archaeology.
$3
506760
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
73-05A.
790
1 0
$a
Bergdoll, Barry G.,
$e
advisor
790
$a
0054
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2012
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3494321
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3494321
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入