大葉大學圖書館 |

Evaluating approaches to participation in design: The participants' perspective.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
書名/作者:	Evaluating approaches to participation in design: The participants' perspective.
作者:	Phalen, Kimberly Bosworth.
面頁冊數:	231 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-12, Section: A, page: 4358.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-12A.
標題:	Psychology, Behavioral.
標題:	Landscape Architecture.
標題:	Speech Communication.
ISBN:	9781124915975
摘要、提要註:	Landscape architects and other designers rely on users for feedback about their needs, concerns, and reactions to potential solutions. While these well-intended efforts often fail to meet their goals, evaluations of the effectiveness of design participation from the participants' perspective is lacking. Drawing on the Reasonable Person Model as a conceptual framework, the three studies reported here evaluated participants' understanding of design options, engagement, and sense of meaningful participation. The first two studies, in the context of a design project for nature trails at a medical campus in Midwest U.S., used design sessions and a photoquestionnaire. The third study followed a more systematic approach to compare the effectiveness of different types of design drawings.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3476694

Evaluating approaches to participation in design: The participants' perspective.
Phalen, Kimberly Bosworth.

Evaluating approaches to participation in design: The participants' perspective. - 231 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-12, Section: A, page: 4358.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2011.

Landscape architects and other designers rely on users for feedback about their needs, concerns, and reactions to potential solutions. While these well-intended efforts often fail to meet their goals, evaluations of the effectiveness of design participation from the participants' perspective is lacking. Drawing on the Reasonable Person Model as a conceptual framework, the three studies reported here evaluated participants' understanding of design options, engagement, and sense of meaningful participation. The first two studies, in the context of a design project for nature trails at a medical campus in Midwest U.S., used design sessions and a photoquestionnaire. The third study followed a more systematic approach to compare the effectiveness of different types of design drawings.

ISBN: 9781124915975Subjects--Topical Terms:

423442
Psychology, Behavioral.

Evaluating approaches to participation in design: The participants' perspective.
LDR:03355nam 2200337 4500 001 365378
005 20120516132936.5
008 121018s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124915975
035 $a (UMI)AAI3476694
035 $a AAI3476694
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Phalen, Kimberly Bosworth. $3 475465
245 1 0 $a Evaluating approaches to participation in design: The participants' perspective.
300 $a 231 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-12, Section: A, page: 4358.
500 $a Adviser: Rachel Kaplan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2011.
520 $a Landscape architects and other designers rely on users for feedback about their needs, concerns, and reactions to potential solutions. While these well-intended efforts often fail to meet their goals, evaluations of the effectiveness of design participation from the participants' perspective is lacking. Drawing on the Reasonable Person Model as a conceptual framework, the three studies reported here evaluated participants' understanding of design options, engagement, and sense of meaningful participation. The first two studies, in the context of a design project for nature trails at a medical campus in Midwest U.S., used design sessions and a photoquestionnaire. The third study followed a more systematic approach to compare the effectiveness of different types of design drawings.
520 $a Participants found the design sessions engaging and their input meaningful. However, the differences in understandability for the different designs are attributable to presentation format, organization, and design graphics. Furthermore, the more difficulty participants had understanding the design presentation, the less they liked the design option presented. This study also found that the photoquestionnaire compared favorably to the design presentations.
520 $a The photoquestionnaire, the focus of the second study, showed that this approach performed particularly well in promoting a sense of meaningful participation for the participating visitors and employees. It also revealed the importance of offering multiple avenues for people to express their concerns so they feel that they have been heard.
520 $a The third study found photorealistic and perspective drawings to be more understandable and engaging and to promote greater confidence in discussing the design than plans and sections. Notably, some plans and sections, characterized as simple, neat, coherent, legible, and using colors that matched common perceptions, performed better than some photorealistic and perspective drawings. Simplification in the representation of design features also enhanced understandability in some cases.
520 $a This research reveals ways designers can facilitate a participation process that meets the cognitive and psychological needs of participants and leads to reliable, useful feedback. It empowers designers by helping them see they can make a difference in creating an effective participation process.
590 $a School code: 0127.
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral. $3 423442
650 4 $a Landscape Architecture. $3 475466
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 423080
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0390
690 $a 0459
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $3 422991
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-12A.
790 1 0 $a Kaplan, Rachel, $e advisor
790 $a 0127
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3476694