大葉大學圖書館 |

Navigating the liminal space between pedagogy and andragogy: Coordination and management of professor-student communication.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Navigating the liminal space between pedagogy and andragogy: Coordination and management of professor-student communication.
Author:	Murray, Darrin S.
Description:	399 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-08, Section: A, page: 2804.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-08A.
Subject:	Speech Communication.
Subject:	Education, Adult and Continuing.
Subject:	Education, Higher.
ISBN:	9781109301038
[NT 15000229]:	Malcolm Knowles used the term pedagogy to refer to the "art and science of teaching children," and argued that many of the existing pedagogical models did not apply to the different ways adults learn and ought to be taught. Alternatively, Knowles advocated andragogy, a prescriptive theory of adult education. While there is considerable literature on both pedagogy and andragogy, little has been explored regarding human development from one to the other; this project begins to fill that gap. I conceptualize the territory between pedagogy and andragogy with the help of Victor Turner's notion of liminal space, a "betwixt and between" region of growth and transformation. This was an exploratory, descriptive study designed to address the research question, "What are the patterns of communication enacted in dyadic conversations where professors are attempting to foster student development from pedagogy to andragogy?" Specifically, I researched conversations where there was an attempt to encourage students to be more personally responsible, more internally motivated, more self-directed, or to redefine the student-professor relationship as less authoritarian and more collaborative and mutual. I collected data from 9 participants who recalled the context and turns in such conversations, and then recruited their conversational partner to join this study. A total of 12 conversations were collected from 18 participants in paired interviews. The primary theoretical model framing this study and providing the data analysis heuristics was the Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM). In my interpretations and conclusions, I detail some of the interactional logics that seem to underlie andragogical and pedagogical positions, develop a vocabulary that begins to name and describe some of these conversational patterns, and then identify some of the strategies used to invite, accept, or resist student development toward more andragogical positions. Further, I begin to identify patterns of communication that may indicate conversational and relational turning points (or bifurcation points) and describe some of what is done by interlocutors in those moments to attempt to navigate through the liminal space between pedagogy and andragogy.
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3370126

Navigating the liminal space between pedagogy and andragogy: Coordination and management of professor-student communication.
Murray, Darrin S.

Navigating the liminal space between pedagogy and andragogy: Coordination and management of professor-student communication. - 399 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-08, Section: A, page: 2804.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2009.

Malcolm Knowles used the term pedagogy to refer to the "art and science of teaching children," and argued that many of the existing pedagogical models did not apply to the different ways adults learn and ought to be taught. Alternatively, Knowles advocated andragogy, a prescriptive theory of adult education. While there is considerable literature on both pedagogy and andragogy, little has been explored regarding human development from one to the other; this project begins to fill that gap. I conceptualize the territory between pedagogy and andragogy with the help of Victor Turner's notion of liminal space, a "betwixt and between" region of growth and transformation. This was an exploratory, descriptive study designed to address the research question, "What are the patterns of communication enacted in dyadic conversations where professors are attempting to foster student development from pedagogy to andragogy?" Specifically, I researched conversations where there was an attempt to encourage students to be more personally responsible, more internally motivated, more self-directed, or to redefine the student-professor relationship as less authoritarian and more collaborative and mutual. I collected data from 9 participants who recalled the context and turns in such conversations, and then recruited their conversational partner to join this study. A total of 12 conversations were collected from 18 participants in paired interviews. The primary theoretical model framing this study and providing the data analysis heuristics was the Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM). In my interpretations and conclusions, I detail some of the interactional logics that seem to underlie andragogical and pedagogical positions, develop a vocabulary that begins to name and describe some of these conversational patterns, and then identify some of the strategies used to invite, accept, or resist student development toward more andragogical positions. Further, I begin to identify patterns of communication that may indicate conversational and relational turning points (or bifurcation points) and describe some of what is done by interlocutors in those moments to attempt to navigate through the liminal space between pedagogy and andragogy.

ISBN: 9781109301038Subjects--Topical Terms:

423080
Speech Communication.

Navigating the liminal space between pedagogy and andragogy: Coordination and management of professor-student communication.
LDR:03379nam 2200301 4500 001 344890
005 20100910124346.5
008 110817s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109301038
035 $a (UMI)AAI3370126
035 $a AAI3370126
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Murray, Darrin S. $3 423158
245 1 0 $a Navigating the liminal space between pedagogy and andragogy: Coordination and management of professor-student communication.
300 $a 399 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-08, Section: A, page: 2804.
500 $a Adviser: W. Barnett Pearce.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2009.
520 $a Malcolm Knowles used the term pedagogy to refer to the "art and science of teaching children," and argued that many of the existing pedagogical models did not apply to the different ways adults learn and ought to be taught. Alternatively, Knowles advocated andragogy, a prescriptive theory of adult education. While there is considerable literature on both pedagogy and andragogy, little has been explored regarding human development from one to the other; this project begins to fill that gap. I conceptualize the territory between pedagogy and andragogy with the help of Victor Turner's notion of liminal space, a "betwixt and between" region of growth and transformation. This was an exploratory, descriptive study designed to address the research question, "What are the patterns of communication enacted in dyadic conversations where professors are attempting to foster student development from pedagogy to andragogy?" Specifically, I researched conversations where there was an attempt to encourage students to be more personally responsible, more internally motivated, more self-directed, or to redefine the student-professor relationship as less authoritarian and more collaborative and mutual. I collected data from 9 participants who recalled the context and turns in such conversations, and then recruited their conversational partner to join this study. A total of 12 conversations were collected from 18 participants in paired interviews. The primary theoretical model framing this study and providing the data analysis heuristics was the Coordinated Management of Meaning (CMM). In my interpretations and conclusions, I detail some of the interactional logics that seem to underlie andragogical and pedagogical positions, develop a vocabulary that begins to name and describe some of these conversational patterns, and then identify some of the strategies used to invite, accept, or resist student development toward more andragogical positions. Further, I begin to identify patterns of communication that may indicate conversational and relational turning points (or bifurcation points) and describe some of what is done by interlocutors in those moments to attempt to navigate through the liminal space between pedagogy and andragogy.
520 $a KEY WORDS: communication education, instructional communication, social construction, student development, higher education, social psychology.
590 $a School code: 1503.
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 423080
650 4 $a Education, Adult and Continuing. $3 422959
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 338813
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0516
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a Fielding Graduate University. $3 423159
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-08A.
790 1 0 $a Pearce, W. Barnett, $e advisor
790 $a 1503
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3370126