大葉大學圖書館 |

Improving human reactivity to trauma exposure using affect labeling.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
書名/作者:	Improving human reactivity to trauma exposure using affect labeling.
作者:	Brown, Lily Anna.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, , 2016
面頁冊數:	181 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-09B(E).
標題:	Clinical psychology.
標題:	Psychology.
ISBN:	9781339708751
摘要、提要註:	Background: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is of tremendous public health significance given high prevalence rates, chronicity, and resulting functional impairment. While a number of empirically-supported treatments have been developed, these treatments are not widely available, nor are they universally efficacious. The current studies translate a traditional assessment technique, Script-Driven Imagery, into a computerized training for individuals with elevated trauma reactivity. This imaginal-exposure based training was supplemented with Affect Labeling to determine whether inhibitory learning was enhanced with this augmentation strategy.

Improving human reactivity to trauma exposure using affect labeling.
Brown, Lily Anna.

Improving human reactivity to trauma exposure using affect labeling. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 181 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2016.

Background: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is of tremendous public health significance given high prevalence rates, chronicity, and resulting functional impairment. While a number of empirically-supported treatments have been developed, these treatments are not widely available, nor are they universally efficacious. The current studies translate a traditional assessment technique, Script-Driven Imagery, into a computerized training for individuals with elevated trauma reactivity. This imaginal-exposure based training was supplemented with Affect Labeling to determine whether inhibitory learning was enhanced with this augmentation strategy.

ISBN: 9781339708751Subjects--Topical Terms:

434959
Clinical psychology.

Improving human reactivity to trauma exposure using affect labeling.
LDR:02617nmm a2200313 4500 001 476186
005 20170614101402.5
008 181208s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339708751
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10107475
035 $a AAI10107475
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Brown, Lily Anna. $3 686723
245 1 0 $a Improving human reactivity to trauma exposure using affect labeling.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 181 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Michelle G. Craske.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2016.
520 $a Background: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is of tremendous public health significance given high prevalence rates, chronicity, and resulting functional impairment. While a number of empirically-supported treatments have been developed, these treatments are not widely available, nor are they universally efficacious. The current studies translate a traditional assessment technique, Script-Driven Imagery, into a computerized training for individuals with elevated trauma reactivity. This imaginal-exposure based training was supplemented with Affect Labeling to determine whether inhibitory learning was enhanced with this augmentation strategy.
520 $a Methods: Participants (n=107) were college students and community members who were recruited for two studies. The first compared augmentation Task (Affect Labeling vs. a control task, Shape Labeling) and Order of Task (During vs. After labeling) on physiological and self-report outcomes at Pre- and Post-Training. The second compared Condition (Affect Labeling vs. a control active task, Distraction Labeling vs. a control inactive task, Exposure Only) on Pre- to Post-Training changes in physiological and self-report measures.
520 $a Results: The trainings provided in both studies were effective at reducing self-reported distress and physiological activation from Pre- to Post-Training, though there were no consistent differences based on Condition. There was some evidence that Labeling (including Affect and Distract Labeling) conferred a benefit over No Labeling.
520 $a Conclusions: This study provides initial support for the acceptability and efficacy of this independently-operated computerized training for PTSD. Clinical implications and future directions are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0031.
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 434959
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 180630
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0621
710 2 0 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Psychology. $3 686724
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-09B(E).
790 $a 0031
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English