語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Normative plurality in international...
~
Fuentes, Carlos Ivan.
Normative plurality in international law[electronic resource] :a theory of the determination of applicable rules /
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
340.112
書名/作者:
Normative plurality in international law : a theory of the determination of applicable rules // by Carlos Ivan Fuentes.
作者:
Fuentes, Carlos Ivan.
出版者:
Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2016.
面頁冊數:
xxvi, 240 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:
Springer eBooks
標題:
Legal polycentricity.
標題:
International law.
標題:
Law.
標題:
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
標題:
Sources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations.
標題:
Public Law.
標題:
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
標題:
Human Rights.
ISBN:
9783319439297
ISBN:
9783319439273
內容註:
Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Talking About Sources: The Constant Reliance on a Non-Objectified Element -- Chapter 3. The Imperfect Paradigm: Article 38 of The Statute Of The International Court Of Justice -- Chapter 4. Human Rights as a New Paradigm -- Chapter 5. Normative Plurality in International Law -- Chapter 6. General Conclusion.
摘要、提要註:
This book provides a theoretical framework for explaining the choices made by international decision-makers in terms of what constitutes law. It comprehensively analyzes the practice of human rights courts in applying legal instruments outside their competence and proposes that this practice recognizes that different normative instruments coexist in an un-ordered space, and that meaning can be produced by the free interaction of those instruments around a problem. Based on this, the book advances its normative plurality hypothesis, which states that decision-makers must survey the acquis of international law in order to identify all the instruments containing relevant normative information for a particular situation. The set of rules of law applicable to the situation must then be complemented with other instruments containing specific normative information relevant to the situation, resulting in a complete system of norms advancing a common purpose.
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43929-7
Normative plurality in international law[electronic resource] :a theory of the determination of applicable rules /
Fuentes, Carlos Ivan.
Normative plurality in international law
a theory of the determination of applicable rules /[electronic resource] :by Carlos Ivan Fuentes. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - xxvi, 240 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice,v.571534-6781 ;. - Ius gentium ;v.11..
Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Talking About Sources: The Constant Reliance on a Non-Objectified Element -- Chapter 3. The Imperfect Paradigm: Article 38 of The Statute Of The International Court Of Justice -- Chapter 4. Human Rights as a New Paradigm -- Chapter 5. Normative Plurality in International Law -- Chapter 6. General Conclusion.
This book provides a theoretical framework for explaining the choices made by international decision-makers in terms of what constitutes law. It comprehensively analyzes the practice of human rights courts in applying legal instruments outside their competence and proposes that this practice recognizes that different normative instruments coexist in an un-ordered space, and that meaning can be produced by the free interaction of those instruments around a problem. Based on this, the book advances its normative plurality hypothesis, which states that decision-makers must survey the acquis of international law in order to identify all the instruments containing relevant normative information for a particular situation. The set of rules of law applicable to the situation must then be complemented with other instruments containing specific normative information relevant to the situation, resulting in a complete system of norms advancing a common purpose.
ISBN: 9783319439297
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-43929-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
442117
Legal polycentricity.
LC Class. No.: K236 / .F84 2016
Dewey Class. No.: 340.112
Normative plurality in international law[electronic resource] :a theory of the determination of applicable rules /
LDR
:02445nmm a2200349 a 4500
001
466414
003
DE-He213
005
20160902171511.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
170415s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020
$a
9783319439297
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$a
9783319439273
$q
(paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-319-43929-7
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-319-43929-7
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
K236
$b
.F84 2016
072
7
$a
LB
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
LAM
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
LAW051000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
LAW016000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
340.112
$2
23
090
$a
K236
$b
.F954 2016
100
1
$a
Fuentes, Carlos Ivan.
$3
671180
245
1 0
$a
Normative plurality in international law
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
a theory of the determination of applicable rules /
$c
by Carlos Ivan Fuentes.
260
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2016.
300
$a
xxvi, 240 p. :
$b
ill., digital ;
$c
24 cm.
490
1
$a
Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice,
$x
1534-6781 ;
$v
v.57
505
0
$a
Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Talking About Sources: The Constant Reliance on a Non-Objectified Element -- Chapter 3. The Imperfect Paradigm: Article 38 of The Statute Of The International Court Of Justice -- Chapter 4. Human Rights as a New Paradigm -- Chapter 5. Normative Plurality in International Law -- Chapter 6. General Conclusion.
520
$a
This book provides a theoretical framework for explaining the choices made by international decision-makers in terms of what constitutes law. It comprehensively analyzes the practice of human rights courts in applying legal instruments outside their competence and proposes that this practice recognizes that different normative instruments coexist in an un-ordered space, and that meaning can be produced by the free interaction of those instruments around a problem. Based on this, the book advances its normative plurality hypothesis, which states that decision-makers must survey the acquis of international law in order to identify all the instruments containing relevant normative information for a particular situation. The set of rules of law applicable to the situation must then be complemented with other instruments containing specific normative information relevant to the situation, resulting in a complete system of norms advancing a common purpose.
650
0
$a
Legal polycentricity.
$3
442117
650
0
$a
International law.
$3
341547
650
1 4
$a
Law.
$3
464046
650
2 4
$a
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
$3
464780
650
2 4
$a
Sources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations.
$3
465675
650
2 4
$a
Public Law.
$3
466327
650
2 4
$a
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
$3
464059
650
2 4
$a
Human Rights.
$3
465599
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
463450
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
830
0
$a
Ius gentium ;
$v
v.11.
$3
465679
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43929-7
950
$a
Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43929-7
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入