大葉大學圖書館 |

Philosophy of cancer[electronic resource] :a dynamic and relational view /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	616
書名/作者:	Philosophy of cancer : a dynamic and relational view // by Marta Bertolaso.
作者:	Bertolaso, Marta.
出版者:	Dordrecht : : Springer Netherlands :, 2016.
面頁冊數:	xv, 190 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Cancer - Philosophy.
標題:	Medicine - Philosophy.
標題:	Health - Philosophy.
標題:	Philosophy.
標題:	Philosophy of Biology.
標題:	Cancer Research.
標題:	Cell Biology.
標題:	Philosophy of Medicine.
ISBN:	9789402408652
ISBN:	9789402408638
內容註:	1. Cancer Biology -- 2. The Evolution of Explanatory Models of Cancer -- 3. The Systemic Approach to Cancer: Models and Epistemology -- 4. The Tissue Organization Field Theory and an Anti-Reductionist Campaign -- 5. Towards a Relational Ontology for Cancer -- 6. On Biological Explanations -- 7. Complementary Issues of a Relational View of Biological Determination.
摘要、提要註:	Since the 1970s, the origin of cancer is being explored from the point of view of the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT), focusing on genetic mutations and clonal expansion of somatic cells. As cancer research expanded in several directions, the dominant focus on cells remained steady, but the classes of genes and the kinds of extra-genetic factors that were shown to have causal relevance in the onset of cancer multiplied. The wild heterogeneity of cancer-related mutations and phenotypes, along with the increasing complication of models, led to an oscillation between the hectic search of 'the' few key factors that cause cancer and the discouragement in face of a seeming 'endless complexity'. To tame this complexity, cancer research started to avail itself of the tools that were being developed by Systems Biology. At the same time, anti-reductionist voices began claiming that cancer research was stuck in a sterile research paradigm. This alternative discourse even gave birth to an alternative theory: the Tissue Organization Field Theory (TOFT) A deeper philosophical analysis shows the serious limits of both reductionist and anti-reductionist positions and of their polarization. This book demonstrates that a radical philosophical reflection is necessary to drive cancer research out of its impasses. At the very least, this will be a reflection on the assumptions of different kinds of cancer research, on the implications of what cancer research has been discovering over 40 years and more, on a view of scientific practice that is most able to make sense of the cognitive and social conflicts that are seen in the scientific community (and in its results), and, finally, on the nature of living entities with which we entertain this fascinating epistemological dance that we call scientific research. The proposed Dynamic and Relational View of carcinogenesis is a starting point in all these directions.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2

Philosophy of cancer[electronic resource] :a dynamic and relational view /
Bertolaso, Marta.

Philosophy of cancera dynamic and relational view /[electronic resource] :by Marta Bertolaso. - Dordrecht :Springer Netherlands :2016. - xv, 190 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences,v.182211-1948 ;. - History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences ;v.7..

1. Cancer Biology -- 2. The Evolution of Explanatory Models of Cancer -- 3. The Systemic Approach to Cancer: Models and Epistemology -- 4. The Tissue Organization Field Theory and an Anti-Reductionist Campaign -- 5. Towards a Relational Ontology for Cancer -- 6. On Biological Explanations -- 7. Complementary Issues of a Relational View of Biological Determination.

Since the 1970s, the origin of cancer is being explored from the point of view of the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT), focusing on genetic mutations and clonal expansion of somatic cells. As cancer research expanded in several directions, the dominant focus on cells remained steady, but the classes of genes and the kinds of extra-genetic factors that were shown to have causal relevance in the onset of cancer multiplied. The wild heterogeneity of cancer-related mutations and phenotypes, along with the increasing complication of models, led to an oscillation between the hectic search of 'the' few key factors that cause cancer and the discouragement in face of a seeming 'endless complexity'. To tame this complexity, cancer research started to avail itself of the tools that were being developed by Systems Biology. At the same time, anti-reductionist voices began claiming that cancer research was stuck in a sterile research paradigm. This alternative discourse even gave birth to an alternative theory: the Tissue Organization Field Theory (TOFT) A deeper philosophical analysis shows the serious limits of both reductionist and anti-reductionist positions and of their polarization. This book demonstrates that a radical philosophical reflection is necessary to drive cancer research out of its impasses. At the very least, this will be a reflection on the assumptions of different kinds of cancer research, on the implications of what cancer research has been discovering over 40 years and more, on a view of scientific practice that is most able to make sense of the cognitive and social conflicts that are seen in the scientific community (and in its results), and, finally, on the nature of living entities with which we entertain this fascinating epistemological dance that we call scientific research. The proposed Dynamic and Relational View of carcinogenesis is a starting point in all these directions.

ISBN: 9789402408652

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

670430
Cancer
--Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: RC261

Dewey Class. No.: 616

Philosophy of cancer[electronic resource] :a dynamic and relational view /
LDR:03336nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 465953
003 DE-He213
005 20170213141207.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170411s2016 ne s 0 eng d
020 $a 9789402408652 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9789402408638 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-94-024-0865-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a RC261
072 7 $a HP $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI021000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a SCI086000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 616 $2 23
090 $a RC261 $b .B546 2016
100 1 $a Bertolaso, Marta. $3 670429
245 1 0 $a Philosophy of cancer $h [electronic resource] : $b a dynamic and relational view / $c by Marta Bertolaso.
260 $a Dordrecht : $b Springer Netherlands : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a xv, 190 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences, $x 2211-1948 ; $v v.18
505 0 $a 1. Cancer Biology -- 2. The Evolution of Explanatory Models of Cancer -- 3. The Systemic Approach to Cancer: Models and Epistemology -- 4. The Tissue Organization Field Theory and an Anti-Reductionist Campaign -- 5. Towards a Relational Ontology for Cancer -- 6. On Biological Explanations -- 7. Complementary Issues of a Relational View of Biological Determination.
520 $a Since the 1970s, the origin of cancer is being explored from the point of view of the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT), focusing on genetic mutations and clonal expansion of somatic cells. As cancer research expanded in several directions, the dominant focus on cells remained steady, but the classes of genes and the kinds of extra-genetic factors that were shown to have causal relevance in the onset of cancer multiplied. The wild heterogeneity of cancer-related mutations and phenotypes, along with the increasing complication of models, led to an oscillation between the hectic search of 'the' few key factors that cause cancer and the discouragement in face of a seeming 'endless complexity'. To tame this complexity, cancer research started to avail itself of the tools that were being developed by Systems Biology. At the same time, anti-reductionist voices began claiming that cancer research was stuck in a sterile research paradigm. This alternative discourse even gave birth to an alternative theory: the Tissue Organization Field Theory (TOFT) A deeper philosophical analysis shows the serious limits of both reductionist and anti-reductionist positions and of their polarization. This book demonstrates that a radical philosophical reflection is necessary to drive cancer research out of its impasses. At the very least, this will be a reflection on the assumptions of different kinds of cancer research, on the implications of what cancer research has been discovering over 40 years and more, on a view of scientific practice that is most able to make sense of the cognitive and social conflicts that are seen in the scientific community (and in its results), and, finally, on the nature of living entities with which we entertain this fascinating epistemological dance that we call scientific research. The proposed Dynamic and Relational View of carcinogenesis is a starting point in all these directions.
650 0 $a Cancer $x Philosophy. $3 670430
650 0 $a Medicine $x Philosophy. $3 382044
650 0 $a Health $x Philosophy. $3 641388
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 179430
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Biology. $3 464788
650 2 4 $a Cancer Research. $3 463530
650 2 4 $a Cell Biology. $3 463594
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Medicine. $3 464017
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 463450
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences ; $v v.7. $3 603479
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)