Debating Europe in national parliame...
Europe

 

  • Debating Europe in national parliaments[electronic resource] :public justification and political polarization /
  • 紀錄類型: 書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
    杜威分類號: 341.2422
    書名/作者: Debating Europe in national parliaments : public justification and political polarization // by Frank Wendler.
    作者: Wendler, Frank.
    出版者: London : : Palgrave Macmillan UK :, 2016.
    面頁冊數: ix, 268 p. : : ill., digital ;; 21 cm.
    Contained By: Springer eBooks
    標題: Legislative bodies - European Union countries.
    標題: Political Science and International Relations.
    標題: European Union Politics.
    標題: Comparative Politics.
    標題: European Politics.
    標題: Europe - Commerce - To 1500.
    ISBN: 9781137517272
    ISBN: 9781137517265
    內容註: List of Tables and Figures -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Theoretical Framework -- Chapter 3: Data and Method -- Chapter 4: Formats of Parliamentary Debate about the EU -- Chapter 5: Discursive Justification of European Integration -- Chapter 6: The Polarization of Parliamentary Parties -- Chapter 7: Comparative Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse and Polarization -- Chapter 8: Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index.
    摘要、提要註: This book investigates recent public debates about the European Union (EU) in national parliaments, which have become the primary arena for public debate about the EU. Responding to claims about a politicization of European governance, the author investigates the link between two dimensions of debate - the discursive justification and party political contestation of decision-making in the EU. Embedded in a comparison between the legislatures of four Member States (Austria, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom), the main finding of the book is that generalizable links can be identified between the use of different argumentative frames and patterns of party political polarization. These insights help to clarify the context conditions in which patterns of left/right and government/opposition politics are replaced by more atypical forms of polarization. In a comparative perspective, the author demonstrates that party political factors are a more relevant factor for variation than thematic or country-specific cultural or institutional factors. Case studies include debates on EU Treaty Reform, the Eurozone crisis, and EU enlargement.
    電子資源: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51727-2
評論
Export
取書館別
 
 
變更密碼
登入