大葉大學圖書館 |

A theory of philosophical fallacies[electronic resource] /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	165
書名/作者:	A theory of philosophical fallacies/ by Leonard Nelson.
作者:	Nelson, Leonard.
出版者:	Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2016.
面頁冊數:	vi, 211 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Fallacies (Logic)
標題:	Philosophy.
標題:	Modern Philosophy.
標題:	Applied Linguistics.
標題:	Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
ISBN:	9783319207834
ISBN:	9783319207827
內容註:	Introduction -- The dialectical illusion in philosophy -- On coherence and truth as properties of a philosophical system -- The logistic prejudice in the philosophy of the Schoolmen and in rationalism -- Kant overcomes the rationalistic prejudice: the distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments -- The distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments further explored -- Significance and fruitfulness of the analytic-synthetic distinction -- Synthetic a priori judgments in geometry: the disjunction between logic and experience is incomplete -- Geometric logicism -- Geometric empiricism.
摘要、提要註:	Presented as a Vorlesung in the German philosophical tradition, this book presents the most detailed account of Nelson's method of argument analysis, celebrated by many luminaries such as Karl Popper. It was written in 1921 in opposition to the relativistic, subjectivistic and nihilistic tendencies of Nelson's time. The book contains an exposition of a method that is a further development of Kant's transcendental dialectics, followed by an application to the critical analysis of arguments by many famous thinkers, including Bentham, Mill, Poincaré, Leibniz, Hegel, Einstein, Bergson, Rickert, Simmel, Brentano, Stammler, Jellinek, Dingler, and Meinong. The book presents a general theory of philosophical argumentation as seen from the viewpoint of the typical fallacies committed by anybody arguing philosophically, whether professional philosophers or philosophical laypeople. Although the nature of philosophy and philosophical argumentation is one of the most recurrent objects of reflection for philosophers, this book represents the first attempt at a general theory of philosophical fallacy. According to Nelson, it is in the shape of false dilemmas that errors in reasoning always emerge, and false dilemmas are always the result of the same mechanism--the unwitting replacement of one concept for another.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20783-4

A theory of philosophical fallacies[electronic resource] /
Nelson, Leonard.

A theory of philosophical fallacies[electronic resource] /by Leonard Nelson. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - vi, 211 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Argumentation library,v.261566-7650 ;. - Argumentation library ;v.21..

Introduction -- The dialectical illusion in philosophy -- On coherence and truth as properties of a philosophical system -- The logistic prejudice in the philosophy of the Schoolmen and in rationalism -- Kant overcomes the rationalistic prejudice: the distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments -- The distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments further explored -- Significance and fruitfulness of the analytic-synthetic distinction -- Synthetic a priori judgments in geometry: the disjunction between logic and experience is incomplete -- Geometric logicism -- Geometric empiricism.

Presented as a Vorlesung in the German philosophical tradition, this book presents the most detailed account of Nelson's method of argument analysis, celebrated by many luminaries such as Karl Popper. It was written in 1921 in opposition to the relativistic, subjectivistic and nihilistic tendencies of Nelson's time. The book contains an exposition of a method that is a further development of Kant's transcendental dialectics, followed by an application to the critical analysis of arguments by many famous thinkers, including Bentham, Mill, Poincaré, Leibniz, Hegel, Einstein, Bergson, Rickert, Simmel, Brentano, Stammler, Jellinek, Dingler, and Meinong. The book presents a general theory of philosophical argumentation as seen from the viewpoint of the typical fallacies committed by anybody arguing philosophically, whether professional philosophers or philosophical laypeople. Although the nature of philosophy and philosophical argumentation is one of the most recurrent objects of reflection for philosophers, this book represents the first attempt at a general theory of philosophical fallacy. According to Nelson, it is in the shape of false dilemmas that errors in reasoning always emerge, and false dilemmas are always the result of the same mechanism--the unwitting replacement of one concept for another.

ISBN: 9783319207834

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-20783-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

418822
Fallacies (Logic)

LC Class. No.: BC175

Dewey Class. No.: 165

A theory of philosophical fallacies[electronic resource] /
LDR:02904nam a2200325 a 4500 001 454469
003 DE-He213
005 20160714171434.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 161227s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319207834 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319207827 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-20783-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-20783-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 1 $a eng $h ger
050 4 $a BC175
072 7 $a HPCF $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI016000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 165 $2 23
090 $a BC175 $b .N427 2016
100 1 $a Nelson, Leonard. $3 651974
245 1 2 $a A theory of philosophical fallacies $h [electronic resource] / $c by Leonard Nelson.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a vi, 211 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Argumentation library, $x 1566-7650 ; $v v.26
505 0 $a Introduction -- The dialectical illusion in philosophy -- On coherence and truth as properties of a philosophical system -- The logistic prejudice in the philosophy of the Schoolmen and in rationalism -- Kant overcomes the rationalistic prejudice: the distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments -- The distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments further explored -- Significance and fruitfulness of the analytic-synthetic distinction -- Synthetic a priori judgments in geometry: the disjunction between logic and experience is incomplete -- Geometric logicism -- Geometric empiricism.
520 $a Presented as a Vorlesung in the German philosophical tradition, this book presents the most detailed account of Nelson's method of argument analysis, celebrated by many luminaries such as Karl Popper. It was written in 1921 in opposition to the relativistic, subjectivistic and nihilistic tendencies of Nelson's time. The book contains an exposition of a method that is a further development of Kant's transcendental dialectics, followed by an application to the critical analysis of arguments by many famous thinkers, including Bentham, Mill, Poincaré, Leibniz, Hegel, Einstein, Bergson, Rickert, Simmel, Brentano, Stammler, Jellinek, Dingler, and Meinong. The book presents a general theory of philosophical argumentation as seen from the viewpoint of the typical fallacies committed by anybody arguing philosophically, whether professional philosophers or philosophical laypeople. Although the nature of philosophy and philosophical argumentation is one of the most recurrent objects of reflection for philosophers, this book represents the first attempt at a general theory of philosophical fallacy. According to Nelson, it is in the shape of false dilemmas that errors in reasoning always emerge, and false dilemmas are always the result of the same mechanism--the unwitting replacement of one concept for another.
650 0 $a Fallacies (Logic) $3 418822
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 179430
650 2 4 $a Modern Philosophy. $3 464033
650 2 4 $a Applied Linguistics. $3 463488
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of the Social Sciences. $3 464032
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 463450
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Argumentation library ; $v v.21. $3 464824
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20783-4
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)