大葉大學圖書館 |

Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	320.51
書名/作者:	Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism // D. Weinstein.
其他題名:	Utilitarianism & the New Liberalism
作者:	Weinstein, D.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (xii, 221 pages) : : digital, PDF file(s).
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
標題:	Liberalism.
標題:	Utilitarianism.
ISBN:	9780511490781 (ebook)
內容註:	1. Introduction -- 2. Between Kantianism and utilitarianism: T.H. Green -- 3. Between utilitarianism and perfectionism: L.T. Hobhouse -- 4. Excursus: Green, Hobhouse and contemporary moral philosophy -- 5. Vindicating utilitarianism: D.G. Ritchie -- 6. Utilitarian socialism: J.A. Hobson -- 7. Conclusion: intellectual history and the idolatry of conceptual dichotomies.
摘要、提要註:	In this 2007 study, David Weinstein argues that nineteenth-century English New Liberalism was considerably more indebted to classical English utilitarianism than the received view holds. T. H. Green, L. T. Hobhouse, D. G. Ritchie and J. A. Hobson were liberal consequentialists who followed J. S. Mill in trying to accommodate robust, liberal moral rights with the normative goal of promoting self-realisation. Through careful interpretation of each, Weinstein shows how these theorists brought together themes from idealism, perfectionism and especially utilitarianism to create the new liberalism. Like Mill, they were committed to liberalising consequentialism and systematising liberalism. Because they were no less consequentialists than they were liberals, they constitute a greatly undervalued resource, Mill notwithstanding, for contemporary moral philosophers who remain dedicated to defending a coherent form of liberal consequentialism. The New Liberals had already travelled much of the philosophical ground that contemporary liberal consequentialists are unknowingly retravelling.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490781

Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism /
Weinstein, D.1949-

Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism /Utilitarianism & the New LiberalismD. Weinstein. - 1 online resource (xii, 221 pages) :digital, PDF file(s). - Ideas in context ;83. - Ideas in context ;86.

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

1. Introduction -- 2. Between Kantianism and utilitarianism: T.H. Green -- 3. Between utilitarianism and perfectionism: L.T. Hobhouse -- 4. Excursus: Green, Hobhouse and contemporary moral philosophy -- 5. Vindicating utilitarianism: D.G. Ritchie -- 6. Utilitarian socialism: J.A. Hobson -- 7. Conclusion: intellectual history and the idolatry of conceptual dichotomies.

In this 2007 study, David Weinstein argues that nineteenth-century English New Liberalism was considerably more indebted to classical English utilitarianism than the received view holds. T. H. Green, L. T. Hobhouse, D. G. Ritchie and J. A. Hobson were liberal consequentialists who followed J. S. Mill in trying to accommodate robust, liberal moral rights with the normative goal of promoting self-realisation. Through careful interpretation of each, Weinstein shows how these theorists brought together themes from idealism, perfectionism and especially utilitarianism to create the new liberalism. Like Mill, they were committed to liberalising consequentialism and systematising liberalism. Because they were no less consequentialists than they were liberals, they constitute a greatly undervalued resource, Mill notwithstanding, for contemporary moral philosophers who remain dedicated to defending a coherent form of liberal consequentialism. The New Liberals had already travelled much of the philosophical ground that contemporary liberal consequentialists are unknowingly retravelling.

ISBN: 9780511490781 (ebook)Subjects--Topical Terms:

372330
Liberalism.

LC Class. No.: JC574 / .W43 2007

Dewey Class. No.: 320.51

Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism /
LDR:02553nam a22003258i 4500 001 447720
003 UkCbUP
005 20151005020620.0
006 m|||||o||d||||||||
007 cr||||||||||||
008 161201s2007||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020 $a 9780511490781 (ebook)
020 $z 9780521875288 (hardback)
020 $z 9780521299121 (paperback)
035 $a CR9780511490781
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $e rda $c UkCbUP
050 0 0 $a JC574 $b .W43 2007
082 0 4 $a 320.51 $2 22
100 1 $a Weinstein, D. $q (David), $d 1949- $3 484646
245 1 0 $a Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism / $c D. Weinstein.
246 3 $a Utilitarianism & the New Liberalism
264 1 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2007.
300 $a 1 online resource (xii, 221 pages) : $b digital, PDF file(s).
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
490 1 $a Ideas in context ; $v 83
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Between Kantianism and utilitarianism: T.H. Green -- 3. Between utilitarianism and perfectionism: L.T. Hobhouse -- 4. Excursus: Green, Hobhouse and contemporary moral philosophy -- 5. Vindicating utilitarianism: D.G. Ritchie -- 6. Utilitarian socialism: J.A. Hobson -- 7. Conclusion: intellectual history and the idolatry of conceptual dichotomies.
520 $a In this 2007 study, David Weinstein argues that nineteenth-century English New Liberalism was considerably more indebted to classical English utilitarianism than the received view holds. T. H. Green, L. T. Hobhouse, D. G. Ritchie and J. A. Hobson were liberal consequentialists who followed J. S. Mill in trying to accommodate robust, liberal moral rights with the normative goal of promoting self-realisation. Through careful interpretation of each, Weinstein shows how these theorists brought together themes from idealism, perfectionism and especially utilitarianism to create the new liberalism. Like Mill, they were committed to liberalising consequentialism and systematising liberalism. Because they were no less consequentialists than they were liberals, they constitute a greatly undervalued resource, Mill notwithstanding, for contemporary moral philosophers who remain dedicated to defending a coherent form of liberal consequentialism. The New Liberals had already travelled much of the philosophical ground that contemporary liberal consequentialists are unknowingly retravelling.
650 0 $a Liberalism. $3 372330
650 0 $a Utilitarianism. $3 395456
776 0 8 $i Print version: $z 9780521875288
830 0 $a Ideas in context ; $v 86 $3 414995
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490781