大葉大學圖書館 |

The carrier's liability for deck cargo[electronic resource] :a comparative study on English and Nordic law with general remarks for future legislation /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	623.8881
書名/作者:	The carrier's liability for deck cargo : a comparative study on English and Nordic law with general remarks for future legislation // by Lina Wiedenbach.
作者:	Wiedenbach, Lina.
出版者:	Berlin, Heidelberg : : Springer Berlin Heidelberg :, 2015.
面頁冊數:	xv, 178 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Cargo handling - Law and legislation.
標題:	Cargo ships - Handling.
標題:	Maritime law.
標題:	Liability (Law) - Handling.
標題:	Law.
標題:	Law of the Sea, Air and Outer Space.
標題:	Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
標題:	International Economic Law, Trade Law.
ISBN:	9783662468517 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:	9783662468500 (paper)
內容註:	Introduction -- Background -- Treaty Law -- National Law -- When goods may be carried on deck -- Liability for deck cargo.
摘要、提要註:	This book deals with the carrier's liability for deck cargo in the Nordic countries and England as state parties of the Hague-Visby Rules. The comparative method serves to illustrate two widely differing methods of dealing with, first, the exclusion of certain deck cargo from the scope of the Hague-Visby Rules and, second, where not excluded, the Rules failure to include a special deck cargo liability regime. Various solutions similar to the English or Nordic approach, or a combination of the two, have also been adopted in a large number of other jurisdictions. Taking into consideration the massive quantities of cargo that are carried on deck today, the subject is more topical than ever. The complexity of the problem stems from the way in which the deck has, over the years, gradually become a common place to stow cargo. When the Hague Rules were introduced in 1924, deck stowage was an absolute exception due to the great risks involved. As such, the topic must first be looked at in the context of the shipping realities in which the Hague Rules were drafted and then in terms of today's shipping realities. The comparative analysis leading up to the author's conclusions and general remarks for future legislation consists of two parts, the first dealing with the situations in which the carrier is permitted to stow cargo on deck, and the second with the carrier's liability for deck cargo where he has stowed cargo on deck with, or as the case may be, without such permission.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46851-7

The carrier's liability for deck cargo[electronic resource] :a comparative study on English and Nordic law with general remarks for future legislation /
Wiedenbach, Lina.

The carrier's liability for deck cargoa comparative study on English and Nordic law with general remarks for future legislation /[electronic resource] :by Lina Wiedenbach. - Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg :2015. - xv, 178 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Hamburg studies on maritime affairs,v.331614-2462 ;. - Hamburg studies on maritime affairs ;v.14..

Introduction -- Background -- Treaty Law -- National Law -- When goods may be carried on deck -- Liability for deck cargo.

This book deals with the carrier's liability for deck cargo in the Nordic countries and England as state parties of the Hague-Visby Rules. The comparative method serves to illustrate two widely differing methods of dealing with, first, the exclusion of certain deck cargo from the scope of the Hague-Visby Rules and, second, where not excluded, the Rules failure to include a special deck cargo liability regime. Various solutions similar to the English or Nordic approach, or a combination of the two, have also been adopted in a large number of other jurisdictions. Taking into consideration the massive quantities of cargo that are carried on deck today, the subject is more topical than ever. The complexity of the problem stems from the way in which the deck has, over the years, gradually become a common place to stow cargo. When the Hague Rules were introduced in 1924, deck stowage was an absolute exception due to the great risks involved. As such, the topic must first be looked at in the context of the shipping realities in which the Hague Rules were drafted and then in terms of today's shipping realities. The comparative analysis leading up to the author's conclusions and general remarks for future legislation consists of two parts, the first dealing with the situations in which the carrier is permitted to stow cargo on deck, and the second with the carrier's liability for deck cargo where he has stowed cargo on deck with, or as the case may be, without such permission.

ISBN: 9783662468517 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-662-46851-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

626496
Cargo handling
--Law and legislation.

LC Class. No.: VK235

Dewey Class. No.: 623.8881

The carrier's liability for deck cargo[electronic resource] :a comparative study on English and Nordic law with general remarks for future legislation /
LDR:02717nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 438953
003 DE-He213
005 20151231171504.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 160315s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783662468517 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783662468500 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-662-46851-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-662-46851-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a VK235
072 7 $a LBB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 623.8881 $2 23
090 $a VK235 $b .W644 2015
100 1 $a Wiedenbach, Lina. $3 626495
245 1 4 $a The carrier's liability for deck cargo $h [electronic resource] : $b a comparative study on English and Nordic law with general remarks for future legislation / $c by Lina Wiedenbach.
260 $a Berlin, Heidelberg : $b Springer Berlin Heidelberg : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xv, 178 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Hamburg studies on maritime affairs, $x 1614-2462 ; $v v.33
505 0 $a Introduction -- Background -- Treaty Law -- National Law -- When goods may be carried on deck -- Liability for deck cargo.
520 $a This book deals with the carrier's liability for deck cargo in the Nordic countries and England as state parties of the Hague-Visby Rules. The comparative method serves to illustrate two widely differing methods of dealing with, first, the exclusion of certain deck cargo from the scope of the Hague-Visby Rules and, second, where not excluded, the Rules failure to include a special deck cargo liability regime. Various solutions similar to the English or Nordic approach, or a combination of the two, have also been adopted in a large number of other jurisdictions. Taking into consideration the massive quantities of cargo that are carried on deck today, the subject is more topical than ever. The complexity of the problem stems from the way in which the deck has, over the years, gradually become a common place to stow cargo. When the Hague Rules were introduced in 1924, deck stowage was an absolute exception due to the great risks involved. As such, the topic must first be looked at in the context of the shipping realities in which the Hague Rules were drafted and then in terms of today's shipping realities. The comparative analysis leading up to the author's conclusions and general remarks for future legislation consists of two parts, the first dealing with the situations in which the carrier is permitted to stow cargo on deck, and the second with the carrier's liability for deck cargo where he has stowed cargo on deck with, or as the case may be, without such permission.
650 0 $a Cargo handling $x Law and legislation. $3 626496
650 0 $a Cargo ships $x Handling. $3 626497
650 0 $a Maritime law. $3 410456
650 0 $a Liability (Law) $x Handling. $3 626498
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 464046
650 2 4 $a Law of the Sea, Air and Outer Space. $3 464628
650 2 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 464780
650 2 4 $a International Economic Law, Trade Law. $3 465634
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 463450
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Hamburg studies on maritime affairs ; $v v.14. $3 511865
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46851-7
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)