大葉大學圖書館 |

Clinical inertia[electronic resource] :a critique of medical reason /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	610.1
書名/作者:	Clinical inertia : a critique of medical reason // by Gerard Reach.
作者:	Reach, Gerard.
出版者:	Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2015.
面頁冊數:	xxii, 142 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Medical logic.
標題:	Medicine - Philosophy.
標題:	Medical ethics.
標題:	Medicine & Public Health.
標題:	Medicine/Public Health, general.
標題:	Public Health.
標題:	Philosophy of Medicine.
標題:	Quality of Life Research.
ISBN:	9783319098821 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:	9783319098814 (paper)
內容註:	Introduction -- Definitions -- The Evidence: The Gap Between Clinical Guidelines and Reality -- Determinants and Explanatory Models of Clinical Inertia -- The Doctor and Evidence-Based Medicine -- To Do or Not to Do: A Critique of Medical Reason -- Fighting Against True Clinical Inertia -- Conclusion: Time for Medical Reason -- References.
摘要、提要註:	Clinical practice guidelines were initially developed within the context of evidence-based medicine with the goal of putting medical research findings into practice. However, physicians do not always follow them, even when they seem to apply to the particular patient they have to treat. This phenomenon, known as clinical inertia, represents a significant obstacle to the efficiency of care and a major public health problem, the extent of which is demonstrated in this book. An analysis of its causes shows that it stems from a discrepancy between the objective, essentially statistical nature of evidence-based medicine on the one hand and the physician's own complex, subjective view (referred to here as medical reason) on the other. This book proposes a critique of medical reason that may help to reconcile the principles of evidence-based medicine and individual practice. The author is a diabetologist and Professor of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolic Diseases at Paris 13 University. He has authored several books, including one to be published by Springer (Philosophy and Medicine series) under the title: The Mental Mechanisms of Patient Adherence to Long Term Therapies, Mind and Care.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09882-1

Clinical inertia[electronic resource] :a critique of medical reason /
Reach, Gerard.

Clinical inertiaa critique of medical reason /[electronic resource] :by Gerard Reach. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xxii, 142 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Introduction -- Definitions -- The Evidence: The Gap Between Clinical Guidelines and Reality -- Determinants and Explanatory Models of Clinical Inertia -- The Doctor and Evidence-Based Medicine -- To Do or Not to Do: A Critique of Medical Reason -- Fighting Against True Clinical Inertia -- Conclusion: Time for Medical Reason -- References.

Clinical practice guidelines were initially developed within the context of evidence-based medicine with the goal of putting medical research findings into practice. However, physicians do not always follow them, even when they seem to apply to the particular patient they have to treat. This phenomenon, known as clinical inertia, represents a significant obstacle to the efficiency of care and a major public health problem, the extent of which is demonstrated in this book. An analysis of its causes shows that it stems from a discrepancy between the objective, essentially statistical nature of evidence-based medicine on the one hand and the physician's own complex, subjective view (referred to here as medical reason) on the other. This book proposes a critique of medical reason that may help to reconcile the principles of evidence-based medicine and individual practice. The author is a diabetologist and Professor of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolic Diseases at Paris 13 University. He has authored several books, including one to be published by Springer (Philosophy and Medicine series) under the title: The Mental Mechanisms of Patient Adherence to Long Term Therapies, Mind and Care.

ISBN: 9783319098821 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-09882-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

493391
Medical logic.

LC Class. No.: R723

Dewey Class. No.: 610.1

Clinical inertia[electronic resource] :a critique of medical reason /
LDR:02496nam a2200325 a 4500 001 425685
003 DE-He213
005 20150723163529.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 151119s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319098821 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319098814 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-09882-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-09882-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 1 $a eng $h fre
050 4 $a R723
072 7 $a MB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a MED000000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 610.1 $2 23
090 $a R723 $b .R281 2015
100 1 $a Reach, Gerard. $3 604889
240 1 0 $a Intertie clinique. $l English
245 1 0 $a Clinical inertia $h [electronic resource] : $b a critique of medical reason / $c by Gerard Reach.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xxii, 142 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Introduction -- Definitions -- The Evidence: The Gap Between Clinical Guidelines and Reality -- Determinants and Explanatory Models of Clinical Inertia -- The Doctor and Evidence-Based Medicine -- To Do or Not to Do: A Critique of Medical Reason -- Fighting Against True Clinical Inertia -- Conclusion: Time for Medical Reason -- References.
520 $a Clinical practice guidelines were initially developed within the context of evidence-based medicine with the goal of putting medical research findings into practice. However, physicians do not always follow them, even when they seem to apply to the particular patient they have to treat. This phenomenon, known as clinical inertia, represents a significant obstacle to the efficiency of care and a major public health problem, the extent of which is demonstrated in this book. An analysis of its causes shows that it stems from a discrepancy between the objective, essentially statistical nature of evidence-based medicine on the one hand and the physician's own complex, subjective view (referred to here as medical reason) on the other. This book proposes a critique of medical reason that may help to reconcile the principles of evidence-based medicine and individual practice. The author is a diabetologist and Professor of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolic Diseases at Paris 13 University. He has authored several books, including one to be published by Springer (Philosophy and Medicine series) under the title: The Mental Mechanisms of Patient Adherence to Long Term Therapies, Mind and Care.
650 0 $a Medical logic. $3 493391
650 0 $a Medicine $x Philosophy. $3 382044
650 0 $a Medical ethics. $3 191457
650 1 4 $a Medicine & Public Health. $3 463493
650 2 4 $a Medicine/Public Health, general. $3 463494
650 2 4 $a Public Health. $3 381935
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Medicine. $3 464017
650 2 4 $a Quality of Life Research. $3 464150
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 463450
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09882-1
950 $a Medicine (Springer-11650)