語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
A defense of Hume on miracles[electr...
~
Fogelin, Robert J.
A defense of Hume on miracles[electronic resource] /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
212
書名/作者:
A defense of Hume on miracles/ Robert J. Fogelin.
作者:
Fogelin, Robert J.
出版者:
Princeton, N.J. : : Princeton University Press,, ©2003.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (xii, 101 p.).
標題:
Miracles.
ISBN:
9781400825776 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:
1400825776 (electronic bk.)
書目註:
Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-96) and index.
內容註:
The structure of Hume's argument -- Two recent critics -- The place of "Of Miracles" in Hume's philosophy.
摘要、提要註:
"Since its publication in the mid-eighteenth century, Hume's discussion of miracles has been the target of severe and often ill-tempered attacks. In this book, one of our leading historians of philosophy offers a systematic response to these attacks." "Arguing that these criticisms have - from the very start - rested on misreadings, Robert Fogelin begins by providing a narrative of the way Hume's argument actually unfolds. What Hume's critics (and even some of his defenders) have failed to see is that Hume's primary argument depends on fixing the appropriate standards of evaluating testimony presented on behalf of a miracle. Given the definition of a miracle, Hume quite resonably argues that the standards for evaluating such testimony must be extremely high. Hume then argues that as a matter of fact, no testimony on behalf of a religious miracle has even come close to meeting the appropriate standards for acceptance. Fogelin illustrates that Hume's critics have consistently misunderstood the structure of this argument - and have saddled Hume with perfectly awful arguments not found in the text. He responds first to some early critics of Hume's argument and then to two recent critics, David Johnson and John Earman. Fogelin's goal, however, is not to "bash the bashers," but rather to show that Hume's treatment of miracles has a coherence, depth, and power that makes it still the best work on the subject."--Jacket.
電子資源:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sccj
A defense of Hume on miracles[electronic resource] /
Fogelin, Robert J.
A defense of Hume on miracles
[electronic resource] /Robert J. Fogelin. - Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press,©2003. - 1 online resource (xii, 101 p.). - Princeton monographs in philosophy. - Princeton monographs in philosophy..
Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-96) and index.
The structure of Hume's argument -- Two recent critics -- The place of "Of Miracles" in Hume's philosophy.
"Since its publication in the mid-eighteenth century, Hume's discussion of miracles has been the target of severe and often ill-tempered attacks. In this book, one of our leading historians of philosophy offers a systematic response to these attacks." "Arguing that these criticisms have - from the very start - rested on misreadings, Robert Fogelin begins by providing a narrative of the way Hume's argument actually unfolds. What Hume's critics (and even some of his defenders) have failed to see is that Hume's primary argument depends on fixing the appropriate standards of evaluating testimony presented on behalf of a miracle. Given the definition of a miracle, Hume quite resonably argues that the standards for evaluating such testimony must be extremely high. Hume then argues that as a matter of fact, no testimony on behalf of a religious miracle has even come close to meeting the appropriate standards for acceptance. Fogelin illustrates that Hume's critics have consistently misunderstood the structure of this argument - and have saddled Hume with perfectly awful arguments not found in the text. He responds first to some early critics of Hume's argument and then to two recent critics, David Johnson and John Earman. Fogelin's goal, however, is not to "bash the bashers," but rather to show that Hume's treatment of miracles has a coherence, depth, and power that makes it still the best work on the subject."--Jacket.
ISBN: 9781400825776 (electronic bk.)Subjects--Personal Names:
375306
Hume, David,
1711-1776.Subjects--Topical Terms:
392808
Miracles.
LC Class. No.: B1499.M5 / F64 2010
Dewey Class. No.: 212
A defense of Hume on miracles[electronic resource] /
LDR
:02611cam a2200325Ia 4500
001
415650
003
OCoLC
005
20141031020534.0
006
m o d
007
cr cnu---unuuu
008
150203s2003 nju ob 001 0 eng d
020
$a
9781400825776 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
1400825776 (electronic bk.)
020
$z
0691114307 (alk. paper)
020
$z
9780691114309 (alk. paper)
020
$z
0691122431 (pbk.)
020
$z
9780691122434 (pbk.)
035
$a
(OCoLC)650305519
035
$a
ocn650305519
040
$a
N
$b
eng
$e
pn
$c
N
$d
EBLCP
$d
OCLCQ
$d
JSTOR
$d
COO
$d
OCLCQ
$d
OCLCF
$d
OCLCQ
050
4
$a
B1499.M5
$b
F64 2010
082
0 4
$a
212
$2
22
100
1
$a
Fogelin, Robert J.
$3
394100
245
1 2
$a
A defense of Hume on miracles
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
Robert J. Fogelin.
260
$a
Princeton, N.J. :
$b
Princeton University Press,
$c
©2003.
300
$a
1 online resource (xii, 101 p.).
490
1
$a
Princeton monographs in philosophy
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-96) and index.
505
0
$a
The structure of Hume's argument -- Two recent critics -- The place of "Of Miracles" in Hume's philosophy.
520
1
$a
"Since its publication in the mid-eighteenth century, Hume's discussion of miracles has been the target of severe and often ill-tempered attacks. In this book, one of our leading historians of philosophy offers a systematic response to these attacks." "Arguing that these criticisms have - from the very start - rested on misreadings, Robert Fogelin begins by providing a narrative of the way Hume's argument actually unfolds. What Hume's critics (and even some of his defenders) have failed to see is that Hume's primary argument depends on fixing the appropriate standards of evaluating testimony presented on behalf of a miracle. Given the definition of a miracle, Hume quite resonably argues that the standards for evaluating such testimony must be extremely high. Hume then argues that as a matter of fact, no testimony on behalf of a religious miracle has even come close to meeting the appropriate standards for acceptance. Fogelin illustrates that Hume's critics have consistently misunderstood the structure of this argument - and have saddled Hume with perfectly awful arguments not found in the text. He responds first to some early critics of Hume's argument and then to two recent critics, David Johnson and John Earman. Fogelin's goal, however, is not to "bash the bashers," but rather to show that Hume's treatment of miracles has a coherence, depth, and power that makes it still the best work on the subject."--Jacket.
588
0
$a
Print version record.
600
1 0
$a
Hume, David,
$d
1711-1776.
$3
375306
650
0
$a
Miracles.
$3
392808
830
0
$a
Princeton monographs in philosophy.
$3
447481
856
4 0
$u
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sccj
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sccj
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入