語系:
繁體中文
English
日文
簡体中文
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
British sociology's lost biological ...
~
Hobhouse, L. T. (1864-1929.)
British sociology's lost biological roots[electronic resource] :a history of futures past /
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:
301.0941
書名/作者:
British sociology's lost biological roots : a history of futures past // Chris Renwick ; foreword by Steve Fuller.
作者:
Renwick, Chris,
出版者:
Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; : Palgrave Macmillan,, 2012.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource.
標題:
SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General.
標題:
HISTORY / Social History.
標題:
HISTORY / Europe / Great Britain.
標題:
HISTORY / Modern / 19th Century.
標題:
Sociology - History. - Great Britain
標題:
SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / General
標題:
SOCIAL SCIENCE / Regional Studies
ISBN:
9780230367104 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:
0230367100 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:
9780230356160
ISBN:
0230356168
書目註:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
內容註:
List of Illustrations -- Preface -- Foreword; S.Fuller -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- PART I -- Political Economy, the BAAS and Sociology -- PARTII -- Francis Galton and the Science of Eugenics -- Patrick Geddes' Biosocial Science of Civics -- L. T. Hobhouse's Evolutionary Philosophy of Reform -- PART III -- The Origins and Growth of the Sociological Society -- The End of Biological Sociology in Britain -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Bibliography -- --.
摘要、提要註:
For some time, the social sciences have been attacked by those who believe that biology, not society or culture, best explains human behaviour and social organization. While critics, such as evolutionary psychologists, speak disdainfully of a 'Standard Social Science Model', many social scientists react by decrying the reductionism of biological views. With positions so polarized, it is easy to forget that the social sciences and biology were not always seen as different spheres. When, how and why did the split come about? This book seeks answers in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century British debates about sociology, when L. T. Hobhouse, a thinker who battled to keep biological and social science separate, was awarded the UK's first chair of sociology and editorship of The Sociological Review, the country's first sociology journal. Moreover, by recovering Hobhouse's vision for sociology, as well as those of his rivals, including the Scottish biologist and sociologist Patrick Geddes and the eugenicist Francis Galton, this book shows how the history of British sociology can inform discussions about the discipline's future.
電子資源:
http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230367104
British sociology's lost biological roots[electronic resource] :a history of futures past /
Renwick, Chris,1980-
British sociology's lost biological roots
a history of futures past /[electronic resource] :Chris Renwick ; foreword by Steve Fuller. - Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ;Palgrave Macmillan,2012. - 1 online resource.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
List of Illustrations -- Preface -- Foreword; S.Fuller -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- PART I -- Political Economy, the BAAS and Sociology -- PARTII -- Francis Galton and the Science of Eugenics -- Patrick Geddes' Biosocial Science of Civics -- L. T. Hobhouse's Evolutionary Philosophy of Reform -- PART III -- The Origins and Growth of the Sociological Society -- The End of Biological Sociology in Britain -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Bibliography -- --.
For some time, the social sciences have been attacked by those who believe that biology, not society or culture, best explains human behaviour and social organization. While critics, such as evolutionary psychologists, speak disdainfully of a 'Standard Social Science Model', many social scientists react by decrying the reductionism of biological views. With positions so polarized, it is easy to forget that the social sciences and biology were not always seen as different spheres. When, how and why did the split come about? This book seeks answers in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century British debates about sociology, when L. T. Hobhouse, a thinker who battled to keep biological and social science separate, was awarded the UK's first chair of sociology and editorship of The Sociological Review, the country's first sociology journal. Moreover, by recovering Hobhouse's vision for sociology, as well as those of his rivals, including the Scottish biologist and sociologist Patrick Geddes and the eugenicist Francis Galton, this book shows how the history of British sociology can inform discussions about the discipline's future.
ISBN: 9780230367104 (electronic bk.)
Standard No.: 9786613440198
Source: 540598Palgrave Macmillanhttp://www.palgraveconnect.comSubjects--Personal Names:
474034
Hobhouse, L. T.
1864-1929.Subjects--Topical Terms:
472553
SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
336502
Electronic books.
LC Class. No.: HM477.G7 / R465 2012
Dewey Class. No.: 301.0941
British sociology's lost biological roots[electronic resource] :a history of futures past /
LDR
:03240cam 2200409Ka 4500
001
364507
003
OCoLC
005
20120502024501.0
006
m d
007
cr cn|||||||||
008
120814s2012 enk o 000 0deng d
019
$a
778421674
$a
785779476
020
$a
9780230367104 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
0230367100 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
9780230356160
020
$a
0230356168
024
8
$a
9786613440198
035
$a
(OCoLC)774695399
$z
(OCoLC)778421674
$z
(OCoLC)785779476
035
$a
ocn774695399
037
$a
540598
$b
Palgrave Macmillan
$n
http://www.palgraveconnect.com
040
$a
UKPGM
$b
eng
$c
UKPGM
$d
EBLCP
$d
N$T
$d
CDX
$d
YDXCP
$d
E7B
043
$a
e-uk---
049
$a
TEFA
050
1 4
$a
HM477.G7
$b
R465 2012
072
7
$a
SOC
$x
002000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
SOC
$x
053000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
SOC
$x
026000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
301.0941
$2
23
084
$a
SOC026000
$a
HIS054000
$a
HIS015000
$a
HIS037060
$2
bisacsh
100
1
$a
Renwick, Chris,
$d
1980-
$3
474033
245
1 0
$a
British sociology's lost biological roots
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
a history of futures past /
$c
Chris Renwick ; foreword by Steve Fuller.
260
$a
Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ;
$a
New York :
$b
Palgrave Macmillan,
$c
2012.
300
$a
1 online resource.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references and index.
505
0
$a
List of Illustrations -- Preface -- Foreword; S.Fuller -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- PART I -- Political Economy, the BAAS and Sociology -- PARTII -- Francis Galton and the Science of Eugenics -- Patrick Geddes' Biosocial Science of Civics -- L. T. Hobhouse's Evolutionary Philosophy of Reform -- PART III -- The Origins and Growth of the Sociological Society -- The End of Biological Sociology in Britain -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Bibliography -- --.
520
$a
For some time, the social sciences have been attacked by those who believe that biology, not society or culture, best explains human behaviour and social organization. While critics, such as evolutionary psychologists, speak disdainfully of a 'Standard Social Science Model', many social scientists react by decrying the reductionism of biological views. With positions so polarized, it is easy to forget that the social sciences and biology were not always seen as different spheres. When, how and why did the split come about? This book seeks answers in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century British debates about sociology, when L. T. Hobhouse, a thinker who battled to keep biological and social science separate, was awarded the UK's first chair of sociology and editorship of The Sociological Review, the country's first sociology journal. Moreover, by recovering Hobhouse's vision for sociology, as well as those of his rivals, including the Scottish biologist and sociologist Patrick Geddes and the eugenicist Francis Galton, this book shows how the history of British sociology can inform discussions about the discipline's future.
600
1 0
$a
Hobhouse, L. T.
$q
(Leonard Trelawny),
$d
1864-1929.
$3
474034
650
7
$a
SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General.
$2
bisacsh
$3
472553
650
7
$a
HISTORY / Social History.
$2
bisacsh
$3
472525
650
7
$a
HISTORY / Europe / Great Britain.
$2
bisacsh
$3
472533
650
7
$a
HISTORY / Modern / 19th Century.
$2
bisacsh
$3
472535
650
0
$a
Sociology
$z
Great Britain
$x
History.
$3
474035
650
7
$a
SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / General
$2
bisacsh
$3
474036
650
7
$a
SOCIAL SCIENCE / Regional Studies
$2
bisacsh
$3
474037
655
4
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
336502
710
2
$a
Palgrave Connect (Online Service)
$3
472147
776
0 8
$i
Print version:
$a
Renwick, Chris, 1980-
$t
British sociology's lost biological roots.
$d
Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2012
$z
9780230356160
$w
(DLC) 2011049703
$w
(OCoLC)748328931
856
4 0
$3
Palgrave Connect
$u
http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230367104
994
$a
C0
$b
TEF
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
多媒體檔案
http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230367104
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入