大葉大學圖書館 |

登入

回首頁

Making rhetorical scents: An olfacto...

Clemson University.

Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
書名/作者:	Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.
作者:	Miller, Janet.
面頁冊數:	110 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2637.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International48-05.
標題:	Language, Linguistics.
標題:	Language, General.
標題:	Language, Rhetoric and Composition.
ISBN:	9781109747539
摘要、提要註:	Scent is inherently persuasive, but the language of scent is largely missing from rhetoric's vocabulary. This is because language cannot express the "truth" of an odor. Identification of odor as substance is dependent on consubstantiality between the author and reader. We instead describe smells using metaphorical language, or by invoking episodic memories and emotional reactions. In this way, scent is dramatistic. In order to consider the possibility of a grammar of scent beyond metaphor, the author develops an olfactory pentad (Sniff, Context, Emanation, Odor Object, and Response) by applying the framework of Kenneth Burke's dramatistic pentad. In this way, scent is exposed as a powerful rhetorical substance separate from human motive, but motivating in and of itself. The author then explores implications for a rhetoric of scent beyond the literate tradition.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1475552

Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.
Miller, Janet.

Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad. - 110 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2637.

Thesis (M.A.)--Clemson University, 2010.

Scent is inherently persuasive, but the language of scent is largely missing from rhetoric's vocabulary. This is because language cannot express the "truth" of an odor. Identification of odor as substance is dependent on consubstantiality between the author and reader. We instead describe smells using metaphorical language, or by invoking episodic memories and emotional reactions. In this way, scent is dramatistic. In order to consider the possibility of a grammar of scent beyond metaphor, the author develops an olfactory pentad (Sniff, Context, Emanation, Odor Object, and Response) by applying the framework of Kenneth Burke's dramatistic pentad. In this way, scent is exposed as a powerful rhetorical substance separate from human motive, but motivating in and of itself. The author then explores implications for a rhetoric of scent beyond the literate tradition.

ISBN: 9781109747539Subjects--Topical Terms:

423211
Language, Linguistics.

Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.
LDR:01866nam 2200313 4500 001 345036
005 20110603092138.5
008 110817s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109747539
035 $a (UMI)AAI1475552
035 $a AAI1475552
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Miller, Janet. $3 423476
245 1 0 $a Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.
300 $a 110 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2637.
500 $a Adviser: Steven B. Katz.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Clemson University, 2010.
520 $a Scent is inherently persuasive, but the language of scent is largely missing from rhetoric's vocabulary. This is because language cannot express the "truth" of an odor. Identification of odor as substance is dependent on consubstantiality between the author and reader. We instead describe smells using metaphorical language, or by invoking episodic memories and emotional reactions. In this way, scent is dramatistic. In order to consider the possibility of a grammar of scent beyond metaphor, the author develops an olfactory pentad (Sniff, Context, Emanation, Odor Object, and Response) by applying the framework of Kenneth Burke's dramatistic pentad. In this way, scent is exposed as a powerful rhetorical substance separate from human motive, but motivating in and of itself. The author then explores implications for a rhetoric of scent beyond the literate tradition.
590 $a School code: 0050.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 423211
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 423472
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 423125
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a Clemson University. $b English. $3 423477
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 48-05.
790 1 0 $a Katz, Steven B., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Haynes, Cynthia $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Holmevik, Jan R. $e committee member
790 $a 0050
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1475552

筆 0 讀者評論

多媒體

多媒體檔案
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1475552

評論

新增評論分享你的心得

Export

取書館別