大葉大學圖書館 |

Framing the Iraq War endgame[electronic resource] :war's denouement in an age of terror /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
[NT 15000414]:	956.7044/3
Title/Author:	Framing the Iraq War endgame : war's denouement in an age of terror // Erika G. King and Robert A. Wells.
Author:	King, Erika G.
other author:	Wells, Robert A.
Published:	New York : : Palgrave-Macmillan,, c2009.
Description:	278 p. ;; 22 cm.
Subject:	Iraq War, 2003-
Subject:	War on Terrorism, 2001-
ISBN:	9780230100756
ISBN:	0230100759
[NT 15000227]:	Includes bibliographical references (p. [237]-263) and index.
[NT 15000228]:	Dominating the Public War Discourse -- Challenging Bush's Why We Fight Narrative -- Sounding an Official Warning Bell on Mounting Terrorismand Civil War -- Crafting reactions to the Midterm Elections and the Iraq Study Group Report -- Interpreting the Consequences of the Troop Surge -- Spinning and Debating the Petraeus/Crocker Report -- Bush's Endgame Narrative.
[NT 15000229]:	The Bush administration was remarkably successful in dominating the debate over why we had togo to war with Iraq, but it would soon be faced with the more daunting task of winning the monumental rhetorical struggle over how to write the script of the Iraq War endgame. We examine the twists and turns of the discursive battle over the war's denouementas it played out against the backdrop of the war on terror, and we conclude that while Bush failed to win the argument that Iraq was one withour fight against terrorism, his underlying worldview that we must confront terrorist evil through global military engagement remains an important component of Obama adminstration rhetoric.
Online resource:	access to fulltext (Palgrave)

Framing the Iraq War endgame[electronic resource] :war's denouement in an age of terror /
King, Erika G.

Framing the Iraq War endgamewar's denouement in an age of terror /[electronic resource] :Erika G. King and Robert A. Wells. - New York :Palgrave-Macmillan,c2009. - 278 p. ;22 cm.

Includes bibliographical references (p. [237]-263) and index.

Dominating the Public War Discourse -- Challenging Bush's Why We Fight Narrative -- Sounding an Official Warning Bell on Mounting Terrorismand Civil War -- Crafting reactions to the Midterm Elections and the Iraq Study Group Report -- Interpreting the Consequences of the Troop Surge -- Spinning and Debating the Petraeus/Crocker Report -- Bush's Endgame Narrative.

The Bush administration was remarkably successful in dominating the debate over why we had togo to war with Iraq, but it would soon be faced with the more daunting task of winning the monumental rhetorical struggle over how to write the script of the Iraq War endgame. We examine the twists and turns of the discursive battle over the war's denouementas it played out against the backdrop of the war on terror, and we conclude that while Bush failed to win the argument that Iraq was one withour fight against terrorism, his underlying worldview that we must confront terrorist evil through global military engagement remains an important component of Obama adminstration rhetoric.

Electronic reproduction.
Basingstoke, England :
Palgrave Macmillan,
2010.

Mode of access:World Wide Web.

ISBN: 9780230100756

Standard No.: 10.1057/9780230100756doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

343964
Iraq War, 2003-
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

336502
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: DS79.76 / .K548 2009

Dewey Class. No.: 956.7044/3

Framing the Iraq War endgame[electronic resource] :war's denouement in an age of terror /
LDR:02358nam 2200313Ia 4500 001 329586
003 OCoLC
005 20100709082021.0
006 m d
007 cr cn|
008 110607s2009 nyu sb 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9780230100756
020 $a 0230100759
024 7 $a 10.1057/9780230100756 $2 doi
035 $a (OCoLC)497763938
035 $a ocn497763938
040 $a UKPGM $b eng $c UKPGM
043 $a a-iq--- $a n-us---
049 $a APTA
050 1 4 $a DS79.76 $b .K548 2009
082 0 4 $a 956.7044/3 $2 22
100 1 $a King, Erika G. $3 379436
245 1 0 $a Framing the Iraq War endgame $h [electronic resource] : $b war's denouement in an age of terror / $c Erika G. King and Robert A. Wells.
260 $a New York : $b Palgrave-Macmillan, $c c2009.
300 $a 278 p. ; $c 22 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. [237]-263) and index.
505 0 $a Dominating the Public War Discourse -- Challenging Bush's Why We Fight Narrative -- Sounding an Official Warning Bell on Mounting Terrorismand Civil War -- Crafting reactions to the Midterm Elections and the Iraq Study Group Report -- Interpreting the Consequences of the Troop Surge -- Spinning and Debating the Petraeus/Crocker Report -- Bush's Endgame Narrative.
520 $a The Bush administration was remarkably successful in dominating the debate over why we had togo to war with Iraq, but it would soon be faced with the more daunting task of winning the monumental rhetorical struggle over how to write the script of the Iraq War endgame. We examine the twists and turns of the discursive battle over the war's denouementas it played out against the backdrop of the war on terror, and we conclude that while Bush failed to win the argument that Iraq was one withour fight against terrorism, his underlying worldview that we must confront terrorist evil through global military engagement remains an important component of Obama adminstration rhetoric.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Basingstoke, England : $c Palgrave Macmillan, $d 2010. $n Mode of access:World Wide Web. $n System requirements: Web browser. $n Title from title screen (viewed on Jan. 11, 2010). $n Access may be restricted to users at subscribing institutions.
650 0 $a Iraq War, 2003- $3 343964
650 0 $a War on Terrorism, 2001- $3 379438
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 336502
700 1 $a Wells, Robert A. $3 379437
710 2 $a Palgrave Connect (Online service) $3 370384
776 1 $c Original $z 9780230608986 $z 0230608981 $w (DLC) 2009000634 $w (OCoLC)226357098
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230100756 $z access to fulltext (Palgrave)