大葉大學圖書館 |

Making law and courts research relevant[electronic resource] :the normative implications of empirical research /

レコード種別:	コンピュータ・メディア : 単行資料
[NT 15000414] null:	340.072073
タイトル / 著者:	Making law and courts research relevant : the normative implications of empirical research // edited by Brandon L. Bartels and Chris W. Bonneau.
その他の著者:	Bartels, Brandon L.,
出版された:	New York, N.Y. : : Routledge,, 2015.
記述:	1 online resource (xvii, 242 p.)
主題:	Law - Research.
主題:	Law - United States.
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :	9781317693468 (e-book)
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :	9781315777436 (e-book : PDF)
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :	9781317693444 (e-book: Mobi)
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :	9781317693451 (e-book: ePub)
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :	9781138021907 (hardback)
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :	9781138021921 (paperback)
[NT 15000227] null:	Includes bibliographical references and index.
[NT 15000228] null:	pt. 1. The enterprise of normative implications of empirical research -- pt. 2. Law and decisionmaking -- pt. 3. Judicial selection -- pt. 4. Courts in the broader political and societal context -- pt. 5. Conclusion.
[NT 15000229] null:	"One of the more enduring topics of concern for empirically-oriented scholars of law and courts-and political scientists more generally -is how research can be more rectly relevant to broader audiences outside of academia. A significant part of this issue goes back to a seeming disconnect between empirical and normative scholars of law and courts that has increased in recent years.Brandon Bartels and Chris Bonneau argue that being attuned to the normative implications of one's work enhances the quality of empirical work, not to mention makes it substantially more interesting to both academics and non-academic practitioners. Their book's mission is to examine how the normative implications of empirical work in law and courts can be more visible and relevant to audiences beyond academia. Written by scholars of political science, law, and sociology, the chapters in the volume offer ideas on a methodology for communicating normative implications in a balanced, nuanced, and modest manner. The contributors argue that if empirical work is strongly suggestive of certain policy or institutional changes, scholars should make those implications known so that information can be diffused. The volume consists of four sections that respectively address the general enterprise of developing normative implications of empirical research, law and decisionmaking, judicial selection, and courts in the broader political and societal context.This volume represents the start of a conversation on the topic of how the normative implications of empirical research in law and courts can be made more visible. This book will primarily interest scholars of law and courts, as well as students of judicial politics. Other subfields of political science engaging in empirical research will also find the suggestions made in the book relevant. "--
電子資源:	https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317693468

Making law and courts research relevant[electronic resource] :the normative implications of empirical research /
Making law and courts research relevantthe normative implications of empirical research /[electronic resource] :edited by Brandon L. Bartels and Chris W. Bonneau. - New York, N.Y. :Routledge,2015. - 1 online resource (xvii, 242 p.) - Law, courts and politics ;2. - Law, courts and politics ;2..

Includes bibliographical references and index.

pt. 1. The enterprise of normative implications of empirical research -- pt. 2. Law and decisionmaking -- pt. 3. Judicial selection -- pt. 4. Courts in the broader political and societal context -- pt. 5. Conclusion.

"One of the more enduring topics of concern for empirically-oriented scholars of law and courts-and political scientists more generally -is how research can be more rectly relevant to broader audiences outside of academia. A significant part of this issue goes back to a seeming disconnect between empirical and normative scholars of law and courts that has increased in recent years.Brandon Bartels and Chris Bonneau argue that being attuned to the normative implications of one's work enhances the quality of empirical work, not to mention makes it substantially more interesting to both academics and non-academic practitioners. Their book's mission is to examine how the normative implications of empirical work in law and courts can be more visible and relevant to audiences beyond academia. Written by scholars of political science, law, and sociology, the chapters in the volume offer ideas on a methodology for communicating normative implications in a balanced, nuanced, and modest manner. The contributors argue that if empirical work is strongly suggestive of certain policy or institutional changes, scholars should make those implications known so that information can be diffused. The volume consists of four sections that respectively address the general enterprise of developing normative implications of empirical research, law and decisionmaking, judicial selection, and courts in the broader political and societal context.This volume represents the start of a conversation on the topic of how the normative implications of empirical research in law and courts can be made more visible. This book will primarily interest scholars of law and courts, as well as students of judicial politics. Other subfields of political science engaging in empirical research will also find the suggestions made in the book relevant. "--

ISBN: 9781317693468 (e-book)Subjects--Topical Terms:

400528
Law
--Research.

LC Class. No.: KF389 / .M35 2015

Dewey Class. No.: 340.072073 / M235

Making law and courts research relevant[electronic resource] :the normative implications of empirical research /
LDR:03164cmm a2200313 a 4500 001 512686
003 FlBoTFG
005 20181031164532.0
006 m o d
007 cr
008 210927s2015 nyuad ob 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9781317693468 (e-book)
020 $a 9781315777436 (e-book : PDF)
020 $a 9781317693444 (e-book: Mobi)
020 $a 9781317693451 (e-book: ePub)
020 $a 9781138021907 (hardback)
020 $a 9781138021921 (paperback)
035 $a (OCoLC)897457045
035 $a 1071025475
040 $a FlBoTFG $c FlBoTFG
050 4 $a KF389 $b .M35 2015
082 0 4 $a 340.072073 $b M235
245 0 0 $a Making law and courts research relevant $h [electronic resource] : $b the normative implications of empirical research / $c edited by Brandon L. Bartels and Chris W. Bonneau.
260 $a New York, N.Y. : $b Routledge, $c 2015.
300 $a 1 online resource (xvii, 242 p.)
490 1 $a Law, courts and politics ; $v 2
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $a pt. 1. The enterprise of normative implications of empirical research -- pt. 2. Law and decisionmaking -- pt. 3. Judicial selection -- pt. 4. Courts in the broader political and societal context -- pt. 5. Conclusion.
520 $a "One of the more enduring topics of concern for empirically-oriented scholars of law and courts-and political scientists more generally -is how research can be more rectly relevant to broader audiences outside of academia. A significant part of this issue goes back to a seeming disconnect between empirical and normative scholars of law and courts that has increased in recent years.Brandon Bartels and Chris Bonneau argue that being attuned to the normative implications of one's work enhances the quality of empirical work, not to mention makes it substantially more interesting to both academics and non-academic practitioners. Their book's mission is to examine how the normative implications of empirical work in law and courts can be more visible and relevant to audiences beyond academia. Written by scholars of political science, law, and sociology, the chapters in the volume offer ideas on a methodology for communicating normative implications in a balanced, nuanced, and modest manner. The contributors argue that if empirical work is strongly suggestive of certain policy or institutional changes, scholars should make those implications known so that information can be diffused. The volume consists of four sections that respectively address the general enterprise of developing normative implications of empirical research, law and decisionmaking, judicial selection, and courts in the broader political and societal context.This volume represents the start of a conversation on the topic of how the normative implications of empirical research in law and courts can be made more visible. This book will primarily interest scholars of law and courts, as well as students of judicial politics. Other subfields of political science engaging in empirical research will also find the suggestions made in the book relevant. "-- $c Provided by publisher.
650 0 $a Law $x Research. $2 bisacsh $3 400528
650 0 $a Law $z United States. $3 416127
700 1 $a Bartels, Brandon L., $d 1975- $3 733461
700 1 $a Bonneau, Chris W. $3 733462
830 0 $a Law, courts and politics ; $v 2. $3 733463
856 4 0 $u https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317693468