大葉大學圖書館 |

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration[electronic resource] /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	231.044
書名/作者:	Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration/ by Jakob Karl Rinderknecht.
作者:	Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl.
出版者:	Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2016.
面頁冊數:	ix, 281 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Concord - Religious aspects
標題:	Spiritual life - Christianity.
標題:	Religious Studies.
標題:	Christian Theology.
標題:	Comparative Religion.
標題:	Philosophy of Religion.
ISBN:	9783319400990
ISBN:	9783319400983
內容註:	Introduction. The Problem Of Ecclesial Disunion -- Part I. The Joint Declaration: History & Critiques -- 1. Justification And Anthropology In The Jddj -- 2. The Problem Of Differentiated Consensus -- Part II. Consensus And Conceptual Mapping -- 3. What Is Ecumenical Consensus? -- 4. Consensus Despite Difference -- 5. Cognitive Linguistics And Consensus -- 6. Cognitive Linguistics And Theology -- Part III. Mapping The Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj -- 7. Mapping The Catholic Blend: Trent & Concupiscence -- 8. The Catholic Blend Sin And The Jddj -- 9. Mapping The Lutheran Blend: Simul Iustus Et Peccator -- 10. The Lutheran Blend Sin And The Jddj -- Conclusion. Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.
摘要、提要註:	This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus. In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration[electronic resource] /
Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl.

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration[electronic resource] /by Jakob Karl Rinderknecht. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - ix, 281 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue. - Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue..

Introduction. The Problem Of Ecclesial Disunion -- Part I. The Joint Declaration: History & Critiques -- 1. Justification And Anthropology In The Jddj -- 2. The Problem Of Differentiated Consensus -- Part II. Consensus And Conceptual Mapping -- 3. What Is Ecumenical Consensus? -- 4. Consensus Despite Difference -- 5. Cognitive Linguistics And Consensus -- 6. Cognitive Linguistics And Theology -- Part III. Mapping The Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj -- 7. Mapping The Catholic Blend: Trent & Concupiscence -- 8. The Catholic Blend Sin And The Jddj -- 9. Mapping The Lutheran Blend: Simul Iustus Et Peccator -- 10. The Lutheran Blend Sin And The Jddj -- Conclusion. Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.

This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus. In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.

ISBN: 9783319400990

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

673265
Concord
--Religious aspects

LC Class. No.: BV4647.C6

Dewey Class. No.: 231.044

Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration[electronic resource] /
LDR:02813nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 467768
003 DE-He213
005 20161010084410.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170511s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319400990 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319400983 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-40099-0
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BV4647.C6
072 7 $a HRCM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a REL067000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 231.044 $2 23
090 $a BV4647.C6 $b R579 2016
100 1 $a Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl. $3 673264
245 1 0 $a Mapping the differentiated consensus of the joint declaration $h [electronic resource] / $c by Jakob Karl Rinderknecht.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2016.
300 $a ix, 281 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue
505 0 $a Introduction. The Problem Of Ecclesial Disunion -- Part I. The Joint Declaration: History & Critiques -- 1. Justification And Anthropology In The Jddj -- 2. The Problem Of Differentiated Consensus -- Part II. Consensus And Conceptual Mapping -- 3. What Is Ecumenical Consensus? -- 4. Consensus Despite Difference -- 5. Cognitive Linguistics And Consensus -- 6. Cognitive Linguistics And Theology -- Part III. Mapping The Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj -- 7. Mapping The Catholic Blend: Trent & Concupiscence -- 8. The Catholic Blend Sin And The Jddj -- 9. Mapping The Lutheran Blend: Simul Iustus Et Peccator -- 10. The Lutheran Blend Sin And The Jddj -- Conclusion. Differentiated Consensus In The Jddj.
520 $a This book uses the insights of cognitive linguistics to argue for the possibility of differentiated consensus between separated churches. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, signed by the Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church in 1999, represents the high water mark of the twentieth-century ecumenical movement. It declares that the sixteenth-century condemnations related to justification do not condemn the teachings of the partner church. Some critics reject the agreement, arguing that a consensus that is differentiated is not actually a consensus. In this book, Jakob Karl Rinderknecht shows that mapping the "cognitive blends" that structure meaning can reveal underlying agreement within apparent theological contradictions. He traces Lutheran and Catholic positions on sin in the baptized, especially the Lutheran simul iustus et peccator and the Catholic insistence that concupiscence in the baptized is not sin. He demonstrates that the JDDJ reconciles these positions, and therefore that a truly differentiated consensus is possible.
650 0 $a Concord $x Religious aspects $x Christianity. $3 673265
650 0 $a Spiritual life $x Christianity. $3 436139
650 1 4 $a Religious Studies. $3 465689
650 2 4 $a Christian Theology. $3 660734
650 2 4 $a Comparative Religion. $3 655401
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Religion. $3 464087
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 463450
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Pathways for ecumenical and interreligious dialogue. $3 655400
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40099-0
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)