言語:
日文
English
簡体中文
繁體中文
ヘルプ
ログイン
ホームページ
スイッチ:
ラベル
|
MARC形式
|
国際標準書誌記述(ISBD)
Symbolic legislation theory and deve...
~
Beers, Britta van.
Symbolic legislation theory and developments in biolaw[electronic resource] /
レコード種別:
コンピュータ・メディア : 単行資料
[NT 15000414] null:
344.041
タイトル / 著者:
Symbolic legislation theory and developments in biolaw/ edited by Bart van Klink, Britta van Beers, Lonneke Poort.
その他の著者:
Klink, Bart van.
出版された:
Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2016.
記述:
xi, 301 p. : : digital ;; 24 cm.
含まれています:
Springer eBooks
主題:
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
主題:
Biological Techniques.
主題:
Philosophy of Law.
主題:
Political Science.
主題:
Ethics.
主題:
Biomedical engineering - Law and legislation.
主題:
Law.
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :
9783319333656
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :
9783319333632
[NT 15000229] null:
This edited volume covers new ground by bringing together perspectives from symbolic legislation theory on the one hand, and from biolaw and bioethics on the other hand. Symbolic legislation has a bad name. It usually refers to instances of legislation which are ineffective and that serve other political and social goals than the goals officially stated. Recently, a more positive notion of symbolic legislation has emerged in legislative theory. From this perspective, symbolic legislation is regarded as a positive alternative to the more traditional, top-down legislative approach. The legislature no longer merely issues commands backed up with severe sanctions, as in instrumental legislation. Instead, lawmakers provide open and aspirational norms that are meant to change behavior not by means of threat, but indirectly, through debate and social interaction. Since the 1990s, biomedical developments have revived discussions on symbolic legislation. One of the reasons is that biomedical legislation touches on deep-rooted, symbolic-cultural representations of the biological aspects of human life. Moreover, as it is often impossible to reach consensus on these controversial questions, legislators have sought alternative ways to develop legal frameworks. Consequently, communicative and interactive approaches to legislation are prominent within the governance of medical biotechnology. The symbolic dimensions of biolaw are often overlooked. Yet, it is clear that the symbolic is at the heart of many legal-political debates on bioethical questions. Since the rise of biomedical technologies, human body materials have acquired a scientific, medical and even commercial value. These new approaches, which radically question existing legal symbolizations of the human body, raise the question whether and how the law should continue to reflect symbolic values and meanings. Moreover, how can we decide what these symbolic values are, given the fact that we live in a pluralistic society?
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6
Symbolic legislation theory and developments in biolaw[electronic resource] /
Symbolic legislation theory and developments in biolaw
[electronic resource] /edited by Bart van Klink, Britta van Beers, Lonneke Poort. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - xi, 301 p. :digital ;24 cm. - Legisprudence library, studies on the theory and practice of legislation,v.42213-2813 ;. - Legisprudence library ;v.2..
This edited volume covers new ground by bringing together perspectives from symbolic legislation theory on the one hand, and from biolaw and bioethics on the other hand. Symbolic legislation has a bad name. It usually refers to instances of legislation which are ineffective and that serve other political and social goals than the goals officially stated. Recently, a more positive notion of symbolic legislation has emerged in legislative theory. From this perspective, symbolic legislation is regarded as a positive alternative to the more traditional, top-down legislative approach. The legislature no longer merely issues commands backed up with severe sanctions, as in instrumental legislation. Instead, lawmakers provide open and aspirational norms that are meant to change behavior not by means of threat, but indirectly, through debate and social interaction. Since the 1990s, biomedical developments have revived discussions on symbolic legislation. One of the reasons is that biomedical legislation touches on deep-rooted, symbolic-cultural representations of the biological aspects of human life. Moreover, as it is often impossible to reach consensus on these controversial questions, legislators have sought alternative ways to develop legal frameworks. Consequently, communicative and interactive approaches to legislation are prominent within the governance of medical biotechnology. The symbolic dimensions of biolaw are often overlooked. Yet, it is clear that the symbolic is at the heart of many legal-political debates on bioethical questions. Since the rise of biomedical technologies, human body materials have acquired a scientific, medical and even commercial value. These new approaches, which radically question existing legal symbolizations of the human body, raise the question whether and how the law should continue to reflect symbolic values and meanings. Moreover, how can we decide what these symbolic values are, given the fact that we live in a pluralistic society?
ISBN: 9783319333656
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
464059
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
LC Class. No.: K579.B5 / S96 2016
Dewey Class. No.: 344.041
Symbolic legislation theory and developments in biolaw[electronic resource] /
LDR
:03097nmm a2200325 a 4500
001
465703
003
DE-He213
005
20160831080502.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
170411s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020
$a
9783319333656
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$a
9783319333632
$q
(paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-319-33365-6
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
K579.B5
$b
S96 2016
072
7
$a
LAB
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
LAW079000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
PHI021000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
344.041
$2
23
090
$a
K579.B5
$b
S986 2016
245
0 0
$a
Symbolic legislation theory and developments in biolaw
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
edited by Bart van Klink, Britta van Beers, Lonneke Poort.
260
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2016.
300
$a
xi, 301 p. :
$b
digital ;
$c
24 cm.
490
1
$a
Legisprudence library, studies on the theory and practice of legislation,
$x
2213-2813 ;
$v
v.4
520
$a
This edited volume covers new ground by bringing together perspectives from symbolic legislation theory on the one hand, and from biolaw and bioethics on the other hand. Symbolic legislation has a bad name. It usually refers to instances of legislation which are ineffective and that serve other political and social goals than the goals officially stated. Recently, a more positive notion of symbolic legislation has emerged in legislative theory. From this perspective, symbolic legislation is regarded as a positive alternative to the more traditional, top-down legislative approach. The legislature no longer merely issues commands backed up with severe sanctions, as in instrumental legislation. Instead, lawmakers provide open and aspirational norms that are meant to change behavior not by means of threat, but indirectly, through debate and social interaction. Since the 1990s, biomedical developments have revived discussions on symbolic legislation. One of the reasons is that biomedical legislation touches on deep-rooted, symbolic-cultural representations of the biological aspects of human life. Moreover, as it is often impossible to reach consensus on these controversial questions, legislators have sought alternative ways to develop legal frameworks. Consequently, communicative and interactive approaches to legislation are prominent within the governance of medical biotechnology. The symbolic dimensions of biolaw are often overlooked. Yet, it is clear that the symbolic is at the heart of many legal-political debates on bioethical questions. Since the rise of biomedical technologies, human body materials have acquired a scientific, medical and even commercial value. These new approaches, which radically question existing legal symbolizations of the human body, raise the question whether and how the law should continue to reflect symbolic values and meanings. Moreover, how can we decide what these symbolic values are, given the fact that we live in a pluralistic society?
650
2 4
$a
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
$3
464059
650
2 4
$a
Biological Techniques.
$3
464355
650
2 4
$a
Philosophy of Law.
$3
464800
650
2 4
$a
Political Science.
$3
375120
650
2 4
$a
Ethics.
$3
177847
650
0
$a
Biomedical engineering
$x
Law and legislation.
$3
669958
650
1 4
$a
Law.
$3
464046
700
1
$a
Klink, Bart van.
$3
669955
700
1
$a
Beers, Britta van.
$3
669956
700
1
$a
Poort, Lonneke.
$3
669957
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
463450
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
830
0
$a
Legisprudence library ;
$v
v.2.
$3
635569
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6
950
$a
Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)
~に基づいて 0 論評
マルチメディア (複合媒体資料)
マルチメディアファイル
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6
論評
論評を追加
あなたの考えを共有してください。
Export
受取館
処理
...
パスワードを変更する
ログイン