大葉大學圖書館 |

Rule of law and fundamental rights[electronic resource] :critical comparative analysis of constitutional review in the United States, Germany and Mexico /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	340.11
書名/作者:	Rule of law and fundamental rights : critical comparative analysis of constitutional review in the United States, Germany and Mexico // by Alfredo Narvaez Medecigo.
作者:	Narvaez Medecigo, Alfredo.
出版者:	Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2016.
面頁冊數:	xv, 262 p. : : ill., digital ;; 24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Judicial review - United States.
標題:	Judicial review - Germany.
標題:	Judicial review - Mexico.
標題:	Rule of law - United States.
標題:	Rule of law - Germany.
標題:	Rule of law - Mexico.
標題:	Law.
標題:	Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
標題:	Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
標題:	Constitutional Law.
標題:	Comparative Politics.
ISBN:	9783319245621
ISBN:	9783319245614
內容註:	1. General Introduction -- 2. Rule-of-law and Judicial Federalism: The Role of Ordinary Courts in the Enforcement of Constitutional Rights -- 3. Constitutional Review in the United States of America: Does "Diffused" mean Complete Decentralization? -- 4. The German System of Constitutional Review: Prototype of a Concentrated Model? -- 5. Constitutional Review in Mexico: A Best of All Worlds Solution? -- 6. General Conclusions.
摘要、提要註:	This book, which originated from the broadly held view that there is a lack of Rule-of-law in Mexico, and from the emphasis of traditional academia on cultural elements as the main explanation, explores the question of whether there is any relationship between the system of constitutional review - and thus the 'law' as such - and the level of Rule-of-law in a given state. To do so, it elaborates a theoretical model for achieving Rule-of-law and compares it to the constitutional review systems of the United States, the Federal Republic of Germany, and Mexico. The study concludes that the two former states correspond to the model, while the latter does not. This is fundamentally due to the role each legal system assigns to ordinary jurisdiction in carrying out constitutional review. Whereas the US and Germany have fostered the policy that constitutional review regarding the enforcement of basic rights is the responsibility of ordinary courts, Mexico has relied too heavily on the specialized constitutional jurisdiction.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24562-1

Rule of law and fundamental rights[electronic resource] :critical comparative analysis of constitutional review in the United States, Germany and Mexico /
Narvaez Medecigo, Alfredo.

Rule of law and fundamental rightscritical comparative analysis of constitutional review in the United States, Germany and Mexico /[electronic resource] :by Alfredo Narvaez Medecigo. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - xv, 262 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. General Introduction -- 2. Rule-of-law and Judicial Federalism: The Role of Ordinary Courts in the Enforcement of Constitutional Rights -- 3. Constitutional Review in the United States of America: Does "Diffused" mean Complete Decentralization? -- 4. The German System of Constitutional Review: Prototype of a Concentrated Model? -- 5. Constitutional Review in Mexico: A Best of All Worlds Solution? -- 6. General Conclusions.

This book, which originated from the broadly held view that there is a lack of Rule-of-law in Mexico, and from the emphasis of traditional academia on cultural elements as the main explanation, explores the question of whether there is any relationship between the system of constitutional review - and thus the 'law' as such - and the level of Rule-of-law in a given state. To do so, it elaborates a theoretical model for achieving Rule-of-law and compares it to the constitutional review systems of the United States, the Federal Republic of Germany, and Mexico. The study concludes that the two former states correspond to the model, while the latter does not. This is fundamentally due to the role each legal system assigns to ordinary jurisdiction in carrying out constitutional review. Whereas the US and Germany have fostered the policy that constitutional review regarding the enforcement of basic rights is the responsibility of ordinary courts, Mexico has relied too heavily on the specialized constitutional jurisdiction.

ISBN: 9783319245621

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-24562-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

393308
Judicial review
--United States.

LC Class. No.: K3175 / .N37 2016

Dewey Class. No.: 340.11

Rule of law and fundamental rights[electronic resource] :critical comparative analysis of constitutional review in the United States, Germany and Mexico /
LDR:02546nam a2200337 a 4500 001 455080
003 DE-He213
005 20160802112852.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 161227s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319245621 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319245614 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-24562-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-24562-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K3175 $b .N37 2016
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAW016000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 340.11 $2 23
090 $a K3175 $b .N238 2016
100 1 $a Narvaez Medecigo, Alfredo. $3 653108
245 1 0 $a Rule of law and fundamental rights $h [electronic resource] : $b critical comparative analysis of constitutional review in the United States, Germany and Mexico / $c by Alfredo Narvaez Medecigo.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a xv, 262 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. General Introduction -- 2. Rule-of-law and Judicial Federalism: The Role of Ordinary Courts in the Enforcement of Constitutional Rights -- 3. Constitutional Review in the United States of America: Does "Diffused" mean Complete Decentralization? -- 4. The German System of Constitutional Review: Prototype of a Concentrated Model? -- 5. Constitutional Review in Mexico: A Best of All Worlds Solution? -- 6. General Conclusions.
520 $a This book, which originated from the broadly held view that there is a lack of Rule-of-law in Mexico, and from the emphasis of traditional academia on cultural elements as the main explanation, explores the question of whether there is any relationship between the system of constitutional review - and thus the 'law' as such - and the level of Rule-of-law in a given state. To do so, it elaborates a theoretical model for achieving Rule-of-law and compares it to the constitutional review systems of the United States, the Federal Republic of Germany, and Mexico. The study concludes that the two former states correspond to the model, while the latter does not. This is fundamentally due to the role each legal system assigns to ordinary jurisdiction in carrying out constitutional review. Whereas the US and Germany have fostered the policy that constitutional review regarding the enforcement of basic rights is the responsibility of ordinary courts, Mexico has relied too heavily on the specialized constitutional jurisdiction.
650 0 $a Judicial review $z United States. $3 393308
650 0 $a Judicial review $z Germany. $3 653109
650 0 $a Judicial review $z Mexico. $3 653110
650 0 $a Rule of law $z United States. $3 375699
650 0 $a Rule of law $z Germany. $3 585058
650 0 $a Rule of law $z Mexico. $3 653111
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 464046
650 2 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 464780
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 464059
650 2 4 $a Constitutional Law. $3 464892
650 2 4 $a Comparative Politics. $3 464797
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 463450
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24562-1
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)