大葉大學圖書館 |

The philosophy of historical case studies[electronic resource] /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	509.0072
書名/作者:	The philosophy of historical case studies/ edited by Tilman Sauer, Raphael Scholl.
其他作者:	Sauer, Tilman.
出版者:	Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2016.
面頁冊數:	viii, 296 p. : : ill., digital ;; 25 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Science - Case studies
標題:	Science - History
標題:	History - Philosophy.
標題:	Philosophy and science.
標題:	History.
標題:	History of Science.
標題:	Philosophy of Science.
ISBN:	9783319302294
ISBN:	9783319302270
摘要、提要註:	This volume collects reflections on the role of philosophy in case studies in the history of science. Case studies have played a prominent role in recent history and philosophy of science. They have been used to illustrate, question, explore, or explicate philosophical points of view. Even if not explicitly so, historical narratives are always guided by philosophical background assumptions. But what happens if different philosophies lead to different narratives of the same historical episodes? Can historical case studies decide between competing philosophical viewpoints? What are the criteria that a case study has to fulfill in order to be philosophically relevant? Bringing together leading practitioners in the fields of history and philosophy of the physical and the life sciences, this volume addresses this methodological problem and proposes ways of rendering explicit philosophical assumptions of historical work.
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30229-4

The philosophy of historical case studies[electronic resource] /
The philosophy of historical case studies[electronic resource] /edited by Tilman Sauer, Raphael Scholl. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - viii, 296 p. :ill., digital ;25 cm. - Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science,v.3190068-0346 ;. - Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science ;v.303..

This volume collects reflections on the role of philosophy in case studies in the history of science. Case studies have played a prominent role in recent history and philosophy of science. They have been used to illustrate, question, explore, or explicate philosophical points of view. Even if not explicitly so, historical narratives are always guided by philosophical background assumptions. But what happens if different philosophies lead to different narratives of the same historical episodes? Can historical case studies decide between competing philosophical viewpoints? What are the criteria that a case study has to fulfill in order to be philosophically relevant? Bringing together leading practitioners in the fields of history and philosophy of the physical and the life sciences, this volume addresses this methodological problem and proposes ways of rendering explicit philosophical assumptions of historical work.

ISBN: 9783319302294

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-30229-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

647122
Science
--Case studies

LC Class. No.: D16.8 / .P45 2016

Dewey Class. No.: 509.0072

The philosophy of historical case studies[electronic resource] /
LDR:01938nam a2200313 a 4500 001 450711
003 DE-He213
005 20161028103037.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 161210s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319302294 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319302270 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-30229-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-30229-4
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a D16.8 $b .P45 2016
072 7 $a PDX $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI034000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 509.0072 $2 23
090 $a D16.8 $b .P568 2016
245 0 4 $a The philosophy of historical case studies $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Tilman Sauer, Raphael Scholl.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a viii, 296 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 25 cm.
490 1 $a Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science, $x 0068-0346 ; $v v.319
520 $a This volume collects reflections on the role of philosophy in case studies in the history of science. Case studies have played a prominent role in recent history and philosophy of science. They have been used to illustrate, question, explore, or explicate philosophical points of view. Even if not explicitly so, historical narratives are always guided by philosophical background assumptions. But what happens if different philosophies lead to different narratives of the same historical episodes? Can historical case studies decide between competing philosophical viewpoints? What are the criteria that a case study has to fulfill in order to be philosophically relevant? Bringing together leading practitioners in the fields of history and philosophy of the physical and the life sciences, this volume addresses this methodological problem and proposes ways of rendering explicit philosophical assumptions of historical work.
650 0 $a Science $x Case studies $x Philosophy. $3 647122
650 0 $a Science $x History $x Philosophy. $3 647123
650 0 $a History $x Philosophy. $3 372338
650 0 $a Philosophy and science. $3 375081
650 1 4 $a History. $3 349095
650 2 4 $a History of Science. $3 423539
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 464591
700 1 $a Sauer, Tilman. $3 647120
700 1 $a Scholl, Raphael. $3 647121
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 463450
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science ; $v v.303. $3 589112
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30229-4
950 $a History (Springer-41172)