Comparing institution-building in Ea...
East Asia.

 

  • Comparing institution-building in East Asia :power politics, governance, and critical junctures /
  • 紀錄類型: 書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
    杜威分類號: 337.5
    書名/作者: Comparing institution-building in East Asia : : power politics, governance, and critical junctures // Hidetaka Yoshimatsu.
    作者: Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka,
    面頁冊數: 1 online resource.
    標題: Institution building - East Asia.
    標題: Regional planning - East Asia.
    標題: Regionalism - East Asia.
    標題: Institution building.
    標題: Regional planning.
    標題: Regionalism.
    標題: East Asia.
    ISBN: 1137370556 (electronic bk.)
    ISBN: 9781137370556 (electronic bk.)
    書目註: Includes bibliographical references and index.
    內容註: 1. Introduction -- 2. Frameworks for Analysing Institution-Building in East Asia -- 3. Promoting Trade Liberalisation through Free Trade Agreements -- 4. Developing Institutions for Regional Financial Stability -- 5. Food Security Cooperation through Emergency Rice Reserve -- 6. Energy Security Cooperation under ASEAN+3 -- 7. Environmental Cooperation: The Monitoring of Transboundary Air Pollution -- 8. Conclusion.
    摘要、提要註: This book explores the causes and implications of the diverse programme of institution-building in East Asia by highlighting political interactions among China, Japan, South Korea, and ASEAN in pursuit of self-interests, the influence of critical juncture in historical trajectory, the representation of policymakers' preferences for political legitimacy in domestic politics, and the involvement of researchers for regional governance formation. Examining two processes of initiating and developing multilateral institutions in five policy areas: trade, finance, food security, energy security, and the environment, Yoshimatsu argues that while Japan initiated the formation of regional institutions and made efforts to upgrade them, China exerted decisive power in determining the degree and direction of the upgrading of regional institutions. Contingent crises or events had significant influences upon institution-building in most cases, but the influence of researchers was generally limited due to close linkages with governmental actors and the lack of internal cohesion.
    電子資源: http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137370556
Export
取書館別
 
 
變更密碼
登入