A theory of causation in the social ...
Reutlinger, Alexander, (1980-)

 

  • A theory of causation in the social and biological sciences /
  • レコード種別: 言語・文字資料 (印刷物) : 単行資料
    [NT 15000414] null: 300.1
    タイトル / 著者: A theory of causation in the social and biological sciences // Alexander Reutlinger, University of Cologne, Germany.
    著者: Reutlinger, Alexander,
    記述: 1 online resource (xii, 276 pages)
    主題: Causation.
    主題: Science - Philosophy.
    主題: SOCIAL SCIENCE / Essays
    主題: SOCIAL SCIENCE / Reference
    主題: Biologie.
    主題: Causaliteit.
    主題: Sociale wetenschappen.
    主題: Wetenschapsfilosofie.
    国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) : 1137281049 (electronic bk.)
    国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) : 9781137281043 (electronic bk.)
    [NT 15000227] null: Includes bibliographical references (pages 264-274) and index.
    [NT 15000228] null: PART I: CAUSATION IN THE SPECIAL SCIENCES AND THE INTERVENTIONIST THEORY OF CAUSATION -- Causation in the Special Sciences -- The Interventionist Explication of Causation -- PART II: WHAT IS WRONG WITH INTERVENTIONIST THEORIES -- Counterfactuals: A Problem for Interventionists? -- Getting Rid of Interventions -- Non-Universal Laws -- Woodward Meets Russell: Does Causation Fit into the World of Physics? -- PART III: AN ALTERNATIVE THEORY OF CAUSATION IN SPECIAL SCIENCES -- In Defense of Conceptually Non-Reductive Explications of Causation -- The Comparative Variability Theory of Causation -- Consequences.
    [NT 15000229] null: What exactly do social scientists and biologists say when they make causal claims? This question is one of the central puzzles in philosophy of science. Alexander Reutlinger sets out to answer this question. He aims to provide a theory of causation in the special sciences (that is, a theory causation in the social sciences, the biological sciences and other higher-level sciences). According one recent prominent view, causation is that causation is intimately tied to manipulability and the possibility of intervene. Reutlinger's main negative target is to argue interventionist account of causation is not adequate. Where do interventionist accounts go wrong? Reutlinger argues that the central concept of the interventionist theories ₆ that is, the very concept of an intervention -- is tremendously problematic. Reutlinger's main positive claim consists in replacing the interventionist approach by an alternative explication of causation in the special sciences, the comparative variability theory of causation. This alternative preserves many insights of the interventionist account without a commitment to the claim that causation and interventions are intimately tied together.
    電子資源: http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137281043
マルチメディア (複合媒体資料)
論評
Export
受取館
 
 
パスワードを変更する
ログイン