A postcolonial African American re-r...
Tinsley, Annie ((Professor of religion),)

 

  • A postcolonial African American re-reading of Colossians :identity, reception, and interpretation under the gaze of empire /
  • 紀錄類型: 書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
    杜威分類號: 227/.706
    書名/作者: A postcolonial African American re-reading of Colossians : : identity, reception, and interpretation under the gaze of empire // Annie Tinsley, Shaw University Divinity School.
    作者: Tinsley, Annie
    面頁冊數: 1 online resource.
    標題: Black theology.
    標題: Postcolonial theology.
    標題: RELIGION / Biblical Studies / New Testament
    標題: RELIGION / Biblical Studies / Paul's Letters
    ISBN: 1137326158 (electronic bk.)
    ISBN: 9781137326157 (electronic bk.)
    內容註: General Introduction -- PART I: THE PEOPLE OF COLOSSAE -- 1. Contemporaries of Laodicea and Hierapolis -- 2. Generations of belief in Mysteries and Mythological Cults -- 3. Jews -- 4. Subjects of Greco-Roman Empire -- PART II: IDENTITY ₆ PEOPLE OF AFRICA -- 5. African Traditional Religion -- PART III: IDENTITY - ENSLAVED AFRICANS IN NORTH AMERICA -- 6. Identity through the Language of Enslavers -- 7. Identity through the Language of Enslaved -- PART IV: TOWARDS A RE-READING OF COLOSSIANS -- 8. The Epistle to the Colossians -- 9. Colossians One -- 10. Colossians Two -- 11. Colossians Three -- 12. Colossians Four -- General Conclusions.
    摘要、提要註: "A Postcolonial African American Re-reading of Colossians: Identity, Reception, and Interpretation Under the Gaze of Empire" examines the identities of two seemingly unrelated groups of people; the initial recipients of the letter and the enslaved African in the North American Diaspora. Both groups, although unrelated, share a common element. They are both considered erroneous in their interpretations of the gospel. They are labeled and summarily silenced. This work gives both a voice and determines from their identities their response to the gospel. Despite the lack of harsh labels given to the initial readers of Colossians by modern commentators, the author of the letter was guilty of error in that the letter lacked deference to their former beliefs and culture.
    電子資源: http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137326157
Export
取書館別
 
 
變更密碼
登入