大葉大學圖書館 |

Kant, Schopenhauer and morality[electronic resource] :recovering the categorical imperative /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	171/.2
書名/作者:	Kant, Schopenhauer and morality : recovering the categorical imperative // Mark Thomas Walker.
作者:	Walker, Mark Thomas,
出版者:	New York ; : Palgrave Macmillan,, 2012.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource.
附註:	Includes index.
標題:	PHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy
標題:	PHILOSOPHY / Metaphysics
標題:	PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / General
標題:	SOCIAL SCIENCE / General
ISBN:	9780230356955 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:	0230356958 (electronic bk.)
書目註:	Includes bibliographical references and index.
內容註:	Preface and Acknowledgements -- Introduction: A Great Reversal? -- PART I: HOW KANT FAILED TO JUSTIFY HIS CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -- Justifying Morality -- Groundwork 3 b6 s An Enigmatic Text -- The Second Critique -- Groundwork 2 - Rational Nature as an End-in-itself? -- PART II: HOW KANT SHOULD HAVE JUSTIFIED HIS CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -- Introduction: Reconstructing Groundwork 3 -- From Rational Agency to Freedom -- From Freedom to the Non-Phenomenal -- From�Non-Phenomenality to�Universality -- The Identity of Persons -- Recovering the Categorical Imperative -- Bibliography -- Index -- --.
摘要、提要註:	Why should I be moral? Why should I give any weight to the interests of others simply for what they are, and not for what I can get out of it? After all, we are all different persons aren't we? So your good is your good and my good is mine. Why should your good, just as such, be mine as well? Why should I love my neighbour as myself if s/he is not myself? Drawing upon the work of two great German philosophers, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) this book radically challenges the assumptions lying behind these questions. After reading it you may never think of how you relate to others in quite the same way again.
電子資源:	http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230356955

Kant, Schopenhauer and morality[electronic resource] :recovering the categorical imperative /
Walker, Mark Thomas,1958-

Kant, Schopenhauer and moralityrecovering the categorical imperative /[electronic resource] :Mark Thomas Walker. - New York ;Palgrave Macmillan,2012. - 1 online resource.

Includes index.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Preface and Acknowledgements -- Introduction: A Great Reversal? -- PART I: HOW KANT FAILED TO JUSTIFY HIS CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -- Justifying Morality -- Groundwork 3 b6 s An Enigmatic Text -- The Second Critique -- Groundwork 2 - Rational Nature as an End-in-itself? -- PART II: HOW KANT SHOULD HAVE JUSTIFIED HIS CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -- Introduction: Reconstructing Groundwork 3 -- From Rational Agency to Freedom -- From Freedom to the Non-Phenomenal -- From�Non-Phenomenality to�Universality -- The Identity of Persons -- Recovering the Categorical Imperative -- Bibliography -- Index -- --.

Why should I be moral? Why should I give any weight to the interests of others simply for what they are, and not for what I can get out of it? After all, we are all different persons aren't we? So your good is your good and my good is mine. Why should your good, just as such, be mine as well? Why should I love my neighbour as myself if s/he is not myself? Drawing upon the work of two great German philosophers, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) this book radically challenges the assumptions lying behind these questions. After reading it you may never think of how you relate to others in quite the same way again.

ISBN: 9780230356955 (electronic bk.)

Source: 476976Palgrave Macmillanhttp://www.palgraveconnect.comSubjects--Personal Names:

388874
Kant, Immanuel,
1724-1804--Ethics.Subjects--Topical Terms:

472921
PHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

336502
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: B2799.E8 / W26 2012

Dewey Class. No.: 171/.2

Kant, Schopenhauer and morality[electronic resource] :recovering the categorical imperative /
LDR:03031cam 2200373Ka 4500 001 364486
003 OCoLC
005 20120502024500.0
006 m d
007 cr cn|||||||||
008 120814s2012 nyu o 001 0 eng d
010 $z 2011047564
019 $a 774289041
020 $a 9780230356955 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 0230356958 (electronic bk.)
020 $z 9780230282605 (hardback)
035 $a (OCoLC)767824479 $z (OCoLC)774289041
035 $a ocn767824479
037 $a 476976 $b Palgrave Macmillan $n http://www.palgraveconnect.com
040 $a UKPGM $b eng $c UKPGM $d YDXCP $d E7B $d N$T
049 $a TEFA
050 1 4 $a B2799.E8 $b W26 2012
072 7 $a PHI $x 005000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 171/.2 $2 23
100 1 $a Walker, Mark Thomas, $d 1958- $3 473936
245 1 0 $a Kant, Schopenhauer and morality $h [electronic resource] : $b recovering the categorical imperative / $c Mark Thomas Walker.
260 $a New York ; $a Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK : $b Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2012.
300 $a 1 online resource.
500 $a Includes index.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $a Preface and Acknowledgements -- Introduction: A Great Reversal? -- PART I: HOW KANT FAILED TO JUSTIFY HIS CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -- Justifying Morality -- Groundwork 3 b6 s An Enigmatic Text -- The Second Critique -- Groundwork 2 - Rational Nature as an End-in-itself? -- PART II: HOW KANT SHOULD HAVE JUSTIFIED HIS CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -- Introduction: Reconstructing Groundwork 3 -- From Rational Agency to Freedom -- From Freedom to the Non-Phenomenal -- From�Non-Phenomenality to�Universality -- The Identity of Persons -- Recovering the Categorical Imperative -- Bibliography -- Index -- --.
505 0 $a Introduction : a great reversal? -- Justifying morality -- Groundwork 3 : an enigmatic text -- The second critique -- Groundwork 2 : rational nature as an end-in-itself? -- From rational agency to freedom -- From freedom to non-phenomenal -- From non-phenomenality to universality -- The identity of persons -- Recovering the categorical imperative.
520 $a Why should I be moral? Why should I give any weight to the interests of others simply for what they are, and not for what I can get out of it? After all, we are all different persons aren't we? So your good is your good and my good is mine. Why should your good, just as such, be mine as well? Why should I love my neighbour as myself if s/he is not myself? Drawing upon the work of two great German philosophers, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) this book radically challenges the assumptions lying behind these questions. After reading it you may never think of how you relate to others in quite the same way again.
600 1 0 $a Kant, Immanuel, $d 1724-1804 $x Ethics. $3 388874
600 1 0 $a Schopenhauer, Arthur, $d 1788-1860 $x Ethics. $3 473937
650 7 $a PHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy $2 bisacsh $3 472921
650 7 $a PHILOSOPHY / Metaphysics $2 bisacsh $3 473938
650 7 $a PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / General $2 bisacsh $3 473892
650 7 $a SOCIAL SCIENCE / General $2 bisacsh $3 472634
655 4 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 336502
710 2 $a Palgrave Connect (Online Service) $3 472147
776 0 8 $i Print version: $a Walker, Mark Thomas, 1958- $t Kant, Schopenhauer and morality. $d New York ; Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK : Palgrave Macmillan, 2012 $z 9780230282605 $w (DLC) 2011047564 $w (OCoLC)752062848
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230356955
994 $a C0 $b TEF