大葉大學圖書館 |

Strong states, weak schools[electronic resource] :the benefits and dilemmas of centralized accountability /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	371.200973
書名/作者:	Strong states, weak schools : the benefits and dilemmas of centralized accountability // edited by Bruce Fuller, Melissa K. Henne, Emily Hannum.
其他作者:	Fuller, Bruce.
出版者:	Bingley : : Emerald JAI,, 2008.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (vii, 243 p.) : : ill.
標題:	School management and organization - United States.
標題:	Educational accountability - United States.
標題:	Educational evaluation - United States.
標題:	Teacher effectiveness - United States.
標題:	Organization & management of education.
標題:	Education - Administration
ISBN:	9781846639111 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:	1846639115 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:	9781846639104 (hbk.)
書目註:	Includes bibliographical references and subject index.
內容註:	Liberal learning in centralizing states / Bruce Fuller -- Accountability and teaching practices: school-level actions and teacher responses/ Laura S. Hamilton ... [et al.] -- District leaders eroding school coherence? The interpretation of accountability mandates / Thomas F. Luschei and GayleS. Christensen -- Tightening the ship or slowly sinking? Reshaping teacher's work conditions / Kristin Gordon -- Raising achievement or closing gaps? Identifying effective accountability tools / Melissa K. Henne and Heeju Jang -- High stakes diplomas: organizational responses to California's high school exit exam / Jennifer Jellison Holme -- District capacity and accountability: professional development as reform tool / Soung Bae -- Exit exams and organizational change in a vocational high school / Michele Schmidt ... [et al.]
摘要、提要註:	Civic leaders around the globe now press educators to raise the performance of students and schools. Backed by a colorful array of odd bedfellows - from corporate interests to advocates for thepoor - politicians seek to narrow the aims of learning, advance routine curricular packages, and tightly align standardized tests. Why are governments pushingto centrally regulate teaching and learning at this historical moment?Do these accountability mechanisms succeed in boosting student achievement? How are teachers responding to top-down rules, incentives, and the recasting of what knowledge counts inside school? These are the hotlycontested ideological and empirical questions asked by thisvolume's contributors, a rich mix of sociologists, applied anthropologists, and education researchers. As public schools struggle to regain public confidence, political actors eagerly try to look strong and forceful. But docentralized accountability policies lift the motivation of teachers and students? Or, is this reform strategy a brilliant political remedy - but one that makes little difference inside the classroom.
電子資源:	http://www.emeraldinsight.com/1479-3539/16

Strong states, weak schools[electronic resource] :the benefits and dilemmas of centralized accountability /
Strong states, weak schoolsthe benefits and dilemmas of centralized accountability /[electronic resource] :edited by Bruce Fuller, Melissa K. Henne, Emily Hannum. - 1st ed. - Bingley :Emerald JAI,2008. - 1 online resource (vii, 243 p.) :ill. - Research in sociology of education,v. 161479-3539 ;. - Research in sociology of education ;v. 13..

Includes bibliographical references and subject index.

Liberal learning in centralizing states / Bruce Fuller -- Accountability and teaching practices: school-level actions and teacher responses/ Laura S. Hamilton ... [et al.] -- District leaders eroding school coherence? The interpretation of accountability mandates / Thomas F. Luschei and GayleS. Christensen -- Tightening the ship or slowly sinking? Reshaping teacher's work conditions / Kristin Gordon -- Raising achievement or closing gaps? Identifying effective accountability tools / Melissa K. Henne and Heeju Jang -- High stakes diplomas: organizational responses to California's high school exit exam / Jennifer Jellison Holme -- District capacity and accountability: professional development as reform tool / Soung Bae -- Exit exams and organizational change in a vocational high school / Michele Schmidt ... [et al.]

Civic leaders around the globe now press educators to raise the performance of students and schools. Backed by a colorful array of odd bedfellows - from corporate interests to advocates for thepoor - politicians seek to narrow the aims of learning, advance routine curricular packages, and tightly align standardized tests. Why are governments pushingto centrally regulate teaching and learning at this historical moment?Do these accountability mechanisms succeed in boosting student achievement? How are teachers responding to top-down rules, incentives, and the recasting of what knowledge counts inside school? These are the hotlycontested ideological and empirical questions asked by thisvolume's contributors, a rich mix of sociologists, applied anthropologists, and education researchers. As public schools struggle to regain public confidence, political actors eagerly try to look strong and forceful. But docentralized accountability policies lift the motivation of teachers and students? Or, is this reform strategy a brilliant political remedy - but one that makes little difference inside the classroom.

ISBN: 9781846639111 (electronic bk.)Subjects--Topical Terms:

342756
School management and organization
--United States.

LC Class. No.: LB2806.22 / .S77 2008

Dewey Class. No.: 371.200973

Universal Decimal Class. No.: 37.07

Strong states, weak schools[electronic resource] :the benefits and dilemmas of centralized accountability /
LDR:03248cam a2200361Ma 4500 001 351427
003 oLC
005 20100917015550.0
006 d
007 un|||||||||
008 111228s2008 enka sb 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9781846639111 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 1846639115 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9781846639104 (hbk.)
035 $a 000609
040 $a MEAUC $b eng $c MEAUC $d OCLCQ $d IL4I4 $d ZJC
041 0 $a eng
043 $a n-us---
050 1 4 $a LB2806.22 $b .S77 2008
072 7 $a JNK $2 bicssc
072 7 $a EDU001000 $2 bisacsh
080 $a 37.07
082 0 4 $a 371.200973 $2 22
245 0 0 $a Strong states, weak schools $h [electronic resource] : $b the benefits and dilemmas of centralized accountability / $c edited by Bruce Fuller, Melissa K. Henne, Emily Hannum.
250 $a 1st ed.
260 $a Bingley : $b Emerald JAI, $c 2008.
300 $a 1 online resource (vii, 243 p.) : $b ill.
490 1 $a Research in sociology of education, $x 1479-3539 ; $v v. 16
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and subject index.
505 0 $a Liberal learning in centralizing states / Bruce Fuller -- Accountability and teaching practices: school-level actions and teacher responses/ Laura S. Hamilton ... [et al.] -- District leaders eroding school coherence? The interpretation of accountability mandates / Thomas F. Luschei and GayleS. Christensen -- Tightening the ship or slowly sinking? Reshaping teacher's work conditions / Kristin Gordon -- Raising achievement or closing gaps? Identifying effective accountability tools / Melissa K. Henne and Heeju Jang -- High stakes diplomas: organizational responses to California's high school exit exam / Jennifer Jellison Holme -- District capacity and accountability: professional development as reform tool / Soung Bae -- Exit exams and organizational change in a vocational high school / Michele Schmidt ... [et al.]
520 $a Civic leaders around the globe now press educators to raise the performance of students and schools. Backed by a colorful array of odd bedfellows - from corporate interests to advocates for thepoor - politicians seek to narrow the aims of learning, advance routine curricular packages, and tightly align standardized tests. Why are governments pushingto centrally regulate teaching and learning at this historical moment?Do these accountability mechanisms succeed in boosting student achievement? How are teachers responding to top-down rules, incentives, and the recasting of what knowledge counts inside school? These are the hotlycontested ideological and empirical questions asked by thisvolume's contributors, a rich mix of sociologists, applied anthropologists, and education researchers. As public schools struggle to regain public confidence, political actors eagerly try to look strong and forceful. But docentralized accountability policies lift the motivation of teachers and students? Or, is this reform strategy a brilliant political remedy - but one that makes little difference inside the classroom.
588 $a Description based on print version record.
650 0 $a School management and organization $z United States. $3 342756
650 0 $a Educational accountability $z United States. $3 340503
650 0 $a Educational evaluation $z United States. $3 339820
650 0 $a Teacher effectiveness $z United States. $3 384308
650 7 $a Organization & management of education. $2 bicssc $3 400565
650 7 $a Education $x Administration $x General. $2 bisacsh $3 400768
700 1 $a Fuller, Bruce. $3 439986
700 1 $a Henne, Melissa K. $3 440367
700 1 $a Hannum, Emily. $3 439987
776 0 8 $i Print version: $t Strong states, weak schools. $b 1st ed. $d Bingley, UK :Emerald JAI, 2008 $z 9781846639104 $w (OCoLC)237755781
830 0 $a Research in sociology of education ; $v v. 13. $3 439988
856 4 0 $u http://www.emeraldinsight.com/1479-3539/16