大葉大學圖書館 |

言語: 日文

Making rhetorical scents: An olfacto...

Clemson University.

Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.

レコード種別:	言語・文字資料 (印刷物) : 単行資料
タイトル / 著者:	Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.
著者:	Miller, Janet.
記述:	110 p.
注記:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2637.
含まれています:	Masters Abstracts International48-05.
主題:	Language, Linguistics.
主題:	Language, General.
主題:	Language, Rhetoric and Composition.
国際標準図書番号 (ISBN) :	9781109747539
[NT 15000229] null:	Scent is inherently persuasive, but the language of scent is largely missing from rhetoric's vocabulary. This is because language cannot express the "truth" of an odor. Identification of odor as substance is dependent on consubstantiality between the author and reader. We instead describe smells using metaphorical language, or by invoking episodic memories and emotional reactions. In this way, scent is dramatistic. In order to consider the possibility of a grammar of scent beyond metaphor, the author develops an olfactory pentad (Sniff, Context, Emanation, Odor Object, and Response) by applying the framework of Kenneth Burke's dramatistic pentad. In this way, scent is exposed as a powerful rhetorical substance separate from human motive, but motivating in and of itself. The author then explores implications for a rhetoric of scent beyond the literate tradition.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1475552

Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.
Miller, Janet.

Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad. - 110 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2637.

Thesis (M.A.)--Clemson University, 2010.

Scent is inherently persuasive, but the language of scent is largely missing from rhetoric's vocabulary. This is because language cannot express the "truth" of an odor. Identification of odor as substance is dependent on consubstantiality between the author and reader. We instead describe smells using metaphorical language, or by invoking episodic memories and emotional reactions. In this way, scent is dramatistic. In order to consider the possibility of a grammar of scent beyond metaphor, the author develops an olfactory pentad (Sniff, Context, Emanation, Odor Object, and Response) by applying the framework of Kenneth Burke's dramatistic pentad. In this way, scent is exposed as a powerful rhetorical substance separate from human motive, but motivating in and of itself. The author then explores implications for a rhetoric of scent beyond the literate tradition.

ISBN: 9781109747539Subjects--Topical Terms:

423211
Language, Linguistics.

Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.
LDR:01866nam 2200313 4500 001 345036
005 20110603092138.5
008 110817s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109747539
035 $a (UMI)AAI1475552
035 $a AAI1475552
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Miller, Janet. $3 423476
245 1 0 $a Making rhetorical scents: An olfactory grammar of motives based on Kenneth Burke's pentad.
300 $a 110 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 2637.
500 $a Adviser: Steven B. Katz.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Clemson University, 2010.
520 $a Scent is inherently persuasive, but the language of scent is largely missing from rhetoric's vocabulary. This is because language cannot express the "truth" of an odor. Identification of odor as substance is dependent on consubstantiality between the author and reader. We instead describe smells using metaphorical language, or by invoking episodic memories and emotional reactions. In this way, scent is dramatistic. In order to consider the possibility of a grammar of scent beyond metaphor, the author develops an olfactory pentad (Sniff, Context, Emanation, Odor Object, and Response) by applying the framework of Kenneth Burke's dramatistic pentad. In this way, scent is exposed as a powerful rhetorical substance separate from human motive, but motivating in and of itself. The author then explores implications for a rhetoric of scent beyond the literate tradition.
590 $a School code: 0050.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 423211
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 423472
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 423125
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a Clemson University. $b English. $3 423477
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 48-05.
790 1 0 $a Katz, Steven B., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Haynes, Cynthia $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Holmevik, Jan R. $e committee member
790 $a 0050
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1475552

～に基づいて 0 論評

マルチメディア (複合媒体資料)

マルチメディアファイル
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1475552

論評

論評を追加あなたの考えを共有してください。

Export

受取館