大葉大學圖書館 |

Formulating recruitment and retention policies at the University of Delaware: From affirmative action to diversity in financial aid and admissions.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
書名/作者:	Formulating recruitment and retention policies at the University of Delaware: From affirmative action to diversity in financial aid and admissions.
作者:	Burton, Johnie A., Jr.
面頁冊數:	107 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-11, Section: A, page: 3965.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-11A.
標題:	Business Administration, Marketing.
標題:	Education, Policy.
標題:	Education, Higher.
ISBN:	9781124240619
摘要、提要註:	In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided on two cases that involved affirmative action policies for admission to the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor Law School and the College of Literature, Science and the Arts. Those cases, Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) had implications for the policies universities and colleges undertook to achieve a diverse student body. The Supreme Court decisions necessitated the need for colleges to review their affirmative action policies to determine compliance with the rulings in the Michigan cases and guidance from the United States Department of Education. This Executive Position Paper is a review of admission and financial aid policy at the University of Delaware to determine compliance and recommendations for any necessary changes.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3423310

Formulating recruitment and retention policies at the University of Delaware: From affirmative action to diversity in financial aid and admissions.
Burton, Johnie A., Jr.

Formulating recruitment and retention policies at the University of Delaware: From affirmative action to diversity in financial aid and admissions. - 107 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-11, Section: A, page: 3965.

Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of Delaware, 2010.

In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided on two cases that involved affirmative action policies for admission to the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor Law School and the College of Literature, Science and the Arts. Those cases, Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) had implications for the policies universities and colleges undertook to achieve a diverse student body. The Supreme Court decisions necessitated the need for colleges to review their affirmative action policies to determine compliance with the rulings in the Michigan cases and guidance from the United States Department of Education. This Executive Position Paper is a review of admission and financial aid policy at the University of Delaware to determine compliance and recommendations for any necessary changes.

ISBN: 9781124240619Subjects--Topical Terms:

423167
Business Administration, Marketing.

Formulating recruitment and retention policies at the University of Delaware: From affirmative action to diversity in financial aid and admissions.
LDR:02972nam 2200349 4500 001 345025
005 20110603092135.5
008 110817s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124240619
035 $a (UMI)AAI3423310
035 $a AAI3423310
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Burton, Johnie A., Jr. $3 423454
245 1 0 $a Formulating recruitment and retention policies at the University of Delaware: From affirmative action to diversity in financial aid and admissions.
300 $a 107 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-11, Section: A, page: 3965.
500 $a Advisers: Barbara K. Curry; Leland B. Ware.
502 $a Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of Delaware, 2010.
520 $a In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided on two cases that involved affirmative action policies for admission to the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor Law School and the College of Literature, Science and the Arts. Those cases, Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) had implications for the policies universities and colleges undertook to achieve a diverse student body. The Supreme Court decisions necessitated the need for colleges to review their affirmative action policies to determine compliance with the rulings in the Michigan cases and guidance from the United States Department of Education. This Executive Position Paper is a review of admission and financial aid policy at the University of Delaware to determine compliance and recommendations for any necessary changes.
520 $a The policy review involves looking at the changes in practices, and any changes in minority student enrollment, at selected state flagship universities where lawsuits were filed that involved affirmative action policies in admission or financial aid. The University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Maryland at College Park each experienced lawsuits. The Hopwood v. Texas (1994) case involved affirmative action admission policy at the University of Texas Law School. In Podberesky v. Kirwan (1995) the lawsuit involved a scholarship program limited to African American students.
520 $a Paper one will look at the history of desegregation, affirmative action and diversity; at the national level and the University of Delaware. Policy changes after lawsuits at selected comparable universities will be covered in paper two. Policy implications for the University of Delaware along with recommendations for changes will be presented in paper three.
590 $a School code: 0060.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Marketing. $3 423167
650 4 $a Education, Policy. $3 423456
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 338813
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a University of Delaware. $b School of Education. $3 423455
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-11A.
790 1 0 $a Curry, Barbara K., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Ware, Leland B., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Rys, Gail $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Blacker, David J. $e committee member
790 $a 0060
791 $a D.Ed.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3423310