大葉大學圖書館 |

What makes the EU viable?[electronic resource] :European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	341.242/2
書名/作者:	What makes the EU viable? : European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience // Andrew Glencross.
作者:	Glencross, Andrew.
出版者:	Basingstoke [England] ; : Palgrave Macmillan,, 2009.
面頁冊數:	xii, 232 p. ;; 23 cm.
標題:	European federation.
標題:	Political culture - History - 19th century. - United States
標題:	Europe - Commerce - To 1500.
標題:	United States - Economic conditions - To 1865.
ISBN:	9780230240896
ISBN:	0230240895
書目註:	Includes bibliographical references and index.
內容註:	Introduction: Questioning What Makes the EU Viable -- The Problem ofViability in a Compound Polity -- Developing an Analogical Comparison between the EU and the Antebellum US Republic -- Comparing how the Rules of the Game are Contested -- The Struggle to Maintain a Compound System: Creating and Contesting the Rules of the Game in European Integration -- Contrasting and Explaining the Viability of Two Compound Systems -- The Future Evolution of the EU Compound Polity: The Obstacles to Voluntary Centralization -- Conclusion: Implications for EU Studies and the Debate over the Future of Integration.
摘要、提要註:	This book is distinguished by its use of the antebellum US experience as a foil to address the under-explored question of what makes the EUviable. The nature of political conflict in both casesis defined in terms of four contested rules of the game: state sovereignty, federal competences, political representation and decision-making procedures. Hence, viabilty is conceptualized as the ability to find an agreement overthese four elements. The analysis shows that, to remain viable,the antebellum USA resorted to an ultimately untenable voluntary centralization of these rules of thegame. Conversely, the EU has maintaineda dynamic equilibrium, although this is not a self-reinforcing process. The transatlantic contrast is then used to examine proposals for reforming the EU, especially its system of political representation. The comparison reveals that, despite high expectations, changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.
電子資源:	access to fulltext (Palgrave)

What makes the EU viable?[electronic resource] :European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience /
Glencross, Andrew.

What makes the EU viable?European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience /[electronic resource] :Andrew Glencross. - Basingstoke [England] ;Palgrave Macmillan,2009. - xii, 232 p. ;23 cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Introduction: Questioning What Makes the EU Viable -- The Problem ofViability in a Compound Polity -- Developing an Analogical Comparison between the EU and the Antebellum US Republic -- Comparing how the Rules of the Game are Contested -- The Struggle to Maintain a Compound System: Creating and Contesting the Rules of the Game in European Integration -- Contrasting and Explaining the Viability of Two Compound Systems -- The Future Evolution of the EU Compound Polity: The Obstacles to Voluntary Centralization -- Conclusion: Implications for EU Studies and the Debate over the Future of Integration.

This book is distinguished by its use of the antebellum US experience as a foil to address the under-explored question of what makes the EUviable. The nature of political conflict in both casesis defined in terms of four contested rules of the game: state sovereignty, federal competences, political representation and decision-making procedures. Hence, viabilty is conceptualized as the ability to find an agreement overthese four elements.   The analysis shows that, to remain viable,the antebellum USA resorted to an ultimately untenable voluntary centralization of these rules of thegame. Conversely, the EU has maintaineda dynamic equilibrium, although this is not a self-reinforcing process. The transatlantic contrast is then used to examine proposals for reforming the EU, especially its system of political representation. The comparison reveals that, despite high expectations, changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.

Electronic reproduction.
Basingstoke, England :
Palgrave Macmillan,
2010.

Mode of access:World Wide Web.

ISBN: 9780230240896

Standard No.: 10.1057/9780230240896doiSubjects--Corporate Names:

341628
European Union.
Subjects--Topical Terms:

377602
European federation.
Subjects--Geographical Terms:

340547
Europe
--Commerce--To 1500.Index Terms--Genre/Form:

336502
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: JN30 / .G568 2009

Dewey Class. No.: 341.242/2

What makes the EU viable?[electronic resource] :European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience /
LDR:02923nam 2200313Ia 4500 001 329601
003 OCoLC
005 20100709082040.0
006 m d
007 cr cn|
008 110607s2009 enk sb 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9780230240896
020 $a 0230240895
024 7 $a 10.1057/9780230240896 $2 doi
035 $a (OCoLC)497766833
035 $a ocn497766833
040 $a UKPGM $b eng $c UKPGM
043 $a e------ $a n-us---
049 $a APTA
050 1 4 $a JN30 $b .G568 2009
082 0 4 $a 341.242/2 $2 22
100 1 $a Glencross, Andrew. $3 379477
245 1 0 $a What makes the EU viable? $h [electronic resource] : $b European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience / $c Andrew Glencross.
260 $a Basingstoke [England] ; $a New York : $b Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2009.
300 $a xii, 232 p. ; $c 23 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $a Introduction: Questioning What Makes the EU Viable -- The Problem ofViability in a Compound Polity -- Developing an Analogical Comparison between the EU and the Antebellum US Republic -- Comparing how the Rules of the Game are Contested -- The Struggle to Maintain a Compound System: Creating and Contesting the Rules of the Game in European Integration -- Contrasting and Explaining the Viability of Two Compound Systems -- The Future Evolution of the EU Compound Polity: The Obstacles to Voluntary Centralization -- Conclusion: Implications for EU Studies and the Debate over the Future of Integration.
520 $a This book is distinguished by its use of the antebellum US experience as a foil to address the under-explored question of what makes the EUviable. The nature of political conflict in both casesis defined in terms of four contested rules of the game: state sovereignty, federal competences, political representation and decision-making procedures. Hence, viabilty is conceptualized as the ability to find an agreement overthese four elements.   The analysis shows that, to remain viable,the antebellum USA resorted to an ultimately untenable voluntary centralization of these rules of thegame. Conversely, the EU has maintaineda dynamic equilibrium, although this is not a self-reinforcing process. The transatlantic contrast is then used to examine proposals for reforming the EU, especially its system of political representation. The comparison reveals that, despite high expectations, changing the system of representation is no shortcut solution for the EU's constitutional woes.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Basingstoke, England : $c Palgrave Macmillan, $d 2010. $n Mode of access:World Wide Web. $n System requirements: Web browser. $n Title from title screen (viewed on Jan. 11, 2010). $n Access may be restricted to users at subscribing institutions.
610 2 0 $a European Union. $3 341628
650 0 $a European federation. $3 377602
650 0 $a Political culture $z United States $x History $y 19th century. $3 379478
651 0 $a Europe $x Commerce $x History $y To 1500. $3 340547
651 0 $a United States $x Economic conditions $y To 1865. $3 338488
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 336502
710 2 $a Palgrave Connect (Online service) $3 370384
776 1 $c Original $z 9780230224506 $z 0230224504 $w (DLC) 2009013630 $w (OCoLC)317926821
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230240896 $z access to fulltext (Palgrave)