回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Percepcao (psicologia)" ]

 

  • Percepts, concepts, and categories[electronic resource] :the representation and processing of information /
  • 紀錄類型: 書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
    杜威分類號: 153
    書名/作者: Percepts, concepts, and categories : the representation and processing of information // edited by Barbara Burns.
    其他作者: Burns, Barbara,
    出版者: Amsterdam ; : North-Holland,, 1992.
    面頁冊數: 1 online resource (xviii, 695 p.) : : ill.
    標題: Human information processing.
    標題: Mental representation.
    標題: Perception.
    標題: Concepts.
    標題: Categorization (Psychology)
    標題: Cognition in children.
    標題: Mental Processes.
    標題: Concept Formation.
    標題: Cognition.
    標題: Infant.
    標題: Child.
    標題: Information, Traitement de l', chez l'homme.
    標題: Repr�esentation mentale.
    標題: Cat�egorisation (Psychologie)
    標題: Cognition chez l'enfant.
    標題: SCIENCE - Cognitive Science.
    標題: PSYCHOLOGY - Cognitive Psychology.
    標題: Waarneming.
    標題: Cognitieve psychologie.
    標題: Percepcao (psicologia)
    ISBN: 9780080867472 (electronic bk.)
    ISBN: 0080867472 (electronic bk.)
    書目註: Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
    內容註: Part A: Early Visual Representation and Processing -- Part B: Percepts, Concepts, Categories and Development -- Part C: Categories, Concepts and Learning -- Part D: Higher-Order Representation and Processing.
    摘要、提要註: "The most important distinction derived from the computational view of thought is between structures and processes." So proclaimed Farah and Kosslyn in 1982, arguing that structures and processes cannot be examined in isolation and concluding that "converging operations" are required to isolate the structure-process pair that can explain a particular finding. The distinction between structure and process within the study of percepts, concepts and categories is considered in depth in this volume, with penetrating commentaries by fellow authors concluding each chapter. This interesting format achieves a broad coverage of the various aspects and implications of the structure-process distinction. It affords a salient indication of the diversity of positions as to the description and utility of distinguishing structures and processors. At the same time, it reveals that researchers specializing in areas of study ranging from simple structure and process involved in perceptual organization and texture to complex structure and process associated with reading graphs and chess expertise, do utilize such a distinction in similar ways.
    電子資源: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/publication?issn=01664115&volume=93
Export
取書館別
 
 
變更密碼
登入