大葉大學圖書館 |

Congress, the Supreme Court, and religious liberty :the case of City of Boerne v. Flores /

纪录类型:	书目-语言数据,印刷品 : Monograph/item
[NT 15000414] null:	342.7308/52
[NT 47271] Title/Author:	Congress, the Supreme Court, and religious liberty : : the case of City of Boerne v. Flores // Jerold Waltman.
[NT 51403] remainder title:	City of Boerne v. Flores
作者:	Waltman, Jerold L.,
面页册数:	1 online resource (viii, 199 pages) : illustrations.
标题:	Freedom of religion - United States.
标题:	Religion and law - United States.
标题:	Freedom of religion.
标题:	LAW / Constitutional
标题:	LAW / Public
标题:	Religion and law.
标题:	Boerne (Tex.) - Trials, litigation, etc.
标题:	Texas - Church history.
标题:	United States.
ISBN:	1137300647 (electronic bk.)
ISBN:	9781137300645 (electronic bk.)
[NT 15000227] null:	Includes bibliographical references (pages [187]-194) and index.
[NT 15000228] null:	The road to RFRA -- Boerne, Texas and St. Peter Apostolic Catholic Church -- A building permit denied -- Separation of powers and federalism in the Rehnquist Court -- The Federal District Court and the Court of Appeals -- The Supreme Court decision -- Political reaction -- Back in Boerne: compromising to build a church.
[NT 15000229] null:	"In the landmark case City of Boerne v. Flores, the Supreme Court struck down a major federal statute--the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. This decision raised questions not only about religious freedom in America, but also about federalism and separation of powers. Using the narrative framework of a tense dispute that divided a small Texas town, Waltman offers the first book-length analysis of the constitutional jurisprudence involved in the passage of the act. Congress, the Supreme Court, and Religious Liberty shows how this case and others like it stimulated and advanced an intense legal debate still ongoing today: Can and should the Supreme Court be the exclusive interpreter of the Constitution?"--Provided by publisher.
电子资源:	http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137300645

Congress, the Supreme Court, and religious liberty :the case of City of Boerne v. Flores /
Waltman, Jerold L.,1945-

Congress, the Supreme Court, and religious liberty :the case of City of Boerne v. Flores /City of Boerne v. FloresJerold Waltman. - First edition. - 1 online resource (viii, 199 pages)illustrations.

Includes bibliographical references (pages [187]-194) and index.

The road to RFRA -- Boerne, Texas and St. Peter Apostolic Catholic Church -- A building permit denied -- Separation of powers and federalism in the Rehnquist Court -- The Federal District Court and the Court of Appeals -- The Supreme Court decision -- Political reaction -- Back in Boerne: compromising to build a church.

"In the landmark case City of Boerne v. Flores, the Supreme Court struck down a major federal statute--the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. This decision raised questions not only about religious freedom in America, but also about federalism and separation of powers. Using the narrative framework of a tense dispute that divided a small Texas town, Waltman offers the first book-length analysis of the constitutional jurisprudence involved in the passage of the act. Congress, the Supreme Court, and Religious Liberty shows how this case and others like it stimulated and advanced an intense legal debate still ongoing today: Can and should the Supreme Court be the exclusive interpreter of the Constitution?"--Provided by publisher.

ISBN: 1137300647 (electronic bk.)

Source: 647784Palgrave Macmillanhttp://www.palgraveconnect.comSubjects--Personal Names:

574364
Flores, Patricio,
--Trials, litigation, etc.Subjects--Topical Terms:

408493
Freedom of religion
--United States.Subjects--Geographical Terms:

574366
Boerne (Tex.)
--Trials, litigation, etc.Index Terms--Genre/Form:

336502
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: KF228.B613 / W35 2013

Dewey Class. No.: 342.7308/52

Congress, the Supreme Court, and religious liberty :the case of City of Boerne v. Flores /
LDR:02713cam a2200457Li 4500 001 410153
003 OCoLC
005 20140910115735.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 141231t20132013nyua ob 001 0 eng d
019 $a 854370976
020 $a 1137300647 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9781137300645 (electronic bk.)
020 $z 1137300639 (alk. paper)
020 $z 9781137300638 (alk. paper)
035 $a (OCoLC)877850502 $z (OCoLC)854370976
035 $a ocn877850502
037 $a 647784 $b Palgrave Macmillan $n http://www.palgraveconnect.com
040 $a YDXCP $c YDXCP $d OCLCO $d UKPGM $d N$T $d OCLCO $d OCLCF
043 $a n-us---
049 $a TEFA
050 4 $a KF228.B613 $b W35 2013
072 7 $a LAW $x 018000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAW $x 075000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 342.7308/52 $2 23
100 1 $a Waltman, Jerold L., $d 1945- $3 574363
245 1 0 $a Congress, the Supreme Court, and religious liberty : $b the case of City of Boerne v. Flores / $c Jerold Waltman.
246 3 $a City of Boerne v. Flores
246 3 0 $a Case of City of Boerne v. Flores
250 $a First edition.
264 1 $a New York : $b Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2013.
264 4 $c ©2013
300 $a 1 online resource (viii, 199 pages) $b illustrations.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages [187]-194) and index.
505 0 $a The road to RFRA -- Boerne, Texas and St. Peter Apostolic Catholic Church -- A building permit denied -- Separation of powers and federalism in the Rehnquist Court -- The Federal District Court and the Court of Appeals -- The Supreme Court decision -- Political reaction -- Back in Boerne: compromising to build a church.
520 $a "In the landmark case City of Boerne v. Flores, the Supreme Court struck down a major federal statute--the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. This decision raised questions not only about religious freedom in America, but also about federalism and separation of powers. Using the narrative framework of a tense dispute that divided a small Texas town, Waltman offers the first book-length analysis of the constitutional jurisprudence involved in the passage of the act. Congress, the Supreme Court, and Religious Liberty shows how this case and others like it stimulated and advanced an intense legal debate still ongoing today: Can and should the Supreme Court be the exclusive interpreter of the Constitution?"--Provided by publisher.
588 $a Description based on print version record.
600 1 0 $a Flores, Patricio, $x Trials, litigation, etc. $3 574364
600 1 7 $a Flores, Patricio. $2 fast $3 574365
650 0 $a Freedom of religion $z United States. $3 408493
650 0 $a Religion and law $z United States. $3 394527
650 7 $a Freedom of religion. $3 341551
650 7 $a LAW / Constitutional $2 bisacsh $3 473768
650 7 $a LAW / Public $2 bisacsh $3 473769
650 7 $a Religion and law. $3 415111
651 0 $a Boerne (Tex.) $x Trials, litigation, etc. $3 574366
651 7 $a Texas $x Church history. $3 386753
651 7 $a United States. $3 411759
655 4 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 336502
655 7 $a Trials, litigation, etc. $2 fast $3 574367
776 0 8 $c Original $z 9781137300638 $z 1137300639 $w (DLC) 2013000409
856 4 0 $3 Palgrave Connect $u http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137300645