大葉大學圖書館 |

Reconsidering constitutional formation I[electronic resource] :national sovereignty : a comparative analysis of the juridification by constitution /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
杜威分類號:	341.26
書名/作者:	Reconsidering constitutional formation I : national sovereignty : a comparative analysis of the juridification by constitution // edited by Ulrike Mussig.
其他作者:	Mussig, Ulrike.
出版者:	Cham : : Springer International Publishing :, 2016.
面頁冊數:	xiii, 284 p. : : digital ;; 25 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Constitutional history - 18th century. - Europe
標題:	Constitutional history - 19th century. - Europe
標題:	Constitutional law - Europe.
標題:	Sovereignty.
標題:	Law.
標題:	Constitutional Law.
標題:	Legal History.
標題:	Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
ISBN:	9783319424057
ISBN:	9783319424040
內容註:	Juridification by Constitution. National Sovereignty in the 18th and 19th c. Europe; Ulrike Mussig -- National sovereignty in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. On the meaning(s) of article 25; Brecht Deseure -- The Omnipotence of Parliament in the legitimisation process of 'representative government' during the Albertine Statute (1848-1861); Giuseppe Mecca -- Sovereignty Issue in the Public Discussion in the Era of the Polish 3rd of May Constitution; Anna Tarnowska -- Appendix: English translation of the Statute 'Our free Royal Cities in the States of Rzeczpospolita' of April 18, 1791 by Ulrike Mussig and Max Barnreuther, together with Inge Bily -- About the Authors -- Index.
摘要、提要註:	Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be 'believed' by the subjects and the political elites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processesbecame palpable in the 'religious' affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as 'creeds' of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents' big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the 'renaissance' of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cadiz Constitution 1812) Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu)
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42405-7

Reconsidering constitutional formation I[electronic resource] :national sovereignty : a comparative analysis of the juridification by constitution /
Reconsidering constitutional formation Inational sovereignty : a comparative analysis of the juridification by constitution /[electronic resource] :edited by Ulrike Mussig. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - xiii, 284 p. :digital ;25 cm. - Studies in the history of law and justice,v.62198-9842 ;. - Studies in the history of law and justice ;v.1..

Juridification by Constitution. National Sovereignty in the 18th and 19th c. Europe; Ulrike Mussig -- National sovereignty in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. On the meaning(s) of article 25; Brecht Deseure -- The Omnipotence of Parliament in the legitimisation process of 'representative government' during the Albertine Statute (1848-1861); Giuseppe Mecca -- Sovereignty Issue in the Public Discussion in the Era of the Polish 3rd of May Constitution; Anna Tarnowska -- Appendix: English translation of the Statute 'Our free Royal Cities in the States of Rzeczpospolita' of April 18, 1791 by Ulrike Mussig and Max Barnreuther, together with Inge Bily -- About the Authors -- Index.

Open access.

Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be 'believed' by the subjects and the political elites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processesbecame palpable in the 'religious' affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as 'creeds' of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents' big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the 'renaissance' of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cadiz Constitution 1812) Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu)

ISBN: 9783319424057

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-42405-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

669977
Constitutional history
--Europe--18th century.

LC Class. No.: KZ4041 / .R43 2016

Dewey Class. No.: 341.26

Reconsidering constitutional formation I[electronic resource] :national sovereignty : a comparative analysis of the juridification by constitution /
LDR:04108nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 465712
003 DE-He213
005 20160818083028.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170411s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319424057 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319424040 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-42405-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-42405-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KZ4041 $b .R43 2016
072 7 $a LND $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW018000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 341.26 $2 23
090 $a KZ4041 $b .R311 2016
245 0 0 $a Reconsidering constitutional formation I $h [electronic resource] : $b national sovereignty : a comparative analysis of the juridification by constitution / $c edited by Ulrike Mussig.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a xiii, 284 p. : $b digital ; $c 25 cm.
490 1 $a Studies in the history of law and justice, $x 2198-9842 ; $v v.6
505 0 $a Juridification by Constitution. National Sovereignty in the 18th and 19th c. Europe; Ulrike Mussig -- National sovereignty in the Belgian Constitution of 1831. On the meaning(s) of article 25; Brecht Deseure -- The Omnipotence of Parliament in the legitimisation process of 'representative government' during the Albertine Statute (1848-1861); Giuseppe Mecca -- Sovereignty Issue in the Public Discussion in the Era of the Polish 3rd of May Constitution; Anna Tarnowska -- Appendix: English translation of the Statute 'Our free Royal Cities in the States of Rzeczpospolita' of April 18, 1791 by Ulrike Mussig and Max Barnreuther, together with Inge Bily -- About the Authors -- Index.
506 $a Open access.
520 $a Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitutions from being simply log-books for political experts through a functional approach to the interdependencies between constitution and public discourse. Sovereignty had to be 'believed' by the subjects and the political elites. Such a communicative orientation of constitutional processesbecame palpable in the 'religious' affinities of the constitutional preambles. They were held as 'creeds' of a new order, not only due to their occasional recourse to divine authority, but rather due to the claim for eternal validity contexts of constitutional guarantees. The communication dependency of constitutions was of less concern in terms of the preamble than the constituents' big worries about government organisation. Their indecisiveness between monarchical and popular sovereignty was established through the discrediting of the Republic in the Jacobean reign of terror and the 'renaissance' of the monarchy in the military resistance against the French revolutionary and later Napoleonic campaigns. The constitutional formation as a legal act of constituting could therefore defend the monarchy from the threat of the people (Albertine Statute 1848), could be a legal decision of a national constituent assembly (Belgian Constitution 1831), could borrow from the old liberties (Polish May Constitution 1791) or try to remain in between by referring to the Nation as sovereign (French September Constitution 1791, Cadiz Constitution 1812) Common to all contexts is the use of national sovereignty as a legal starting point. The consequent differentiation between constituent and constituted power manages to justify the self-commitment of political power in legal terms. National sovereignty is the synonym for the juridification of sovereignty by means of the constitution. The novelty of the constitutions of the late 18th and 19th century is the normativity, the positivity of the constitutional law as one unified law, to be the measure for the legality of all other law. Therefore ReConFort will continue with the precedence of constitution. (www.reconfort.eu)
650 0 $a Constitutional history $z Europe $y 18th century. $3 669977
650 0 $a Constitutional history $z Europe $y 19th century. $3 669978
650 0 $a Constitutional law $z Europe. $3 340261
650 0 $a Sovereignty. $3 341556
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 464046
650 2 4 $a Constitutional Law. $3 464892
650 2 4 $a Legal History. $3 669979
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 464059
700 1 $a Mussig, Ulrike. $3 669976
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 463450
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Studies in the history of law and justice ; $v v.1. $3 591958
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42405-7
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)